Only 10$ per sample for interpreting of your UV-Vis spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
  Send your UV-Vis spectra...

STEP1: Open the absorption graph of the material, which is obtained from the UV Vis spectroscopy.

Theory Behind Calculations: UV Vis Spectroscopy absorption peak means the Electrons are absorbing the Energy at some specific wavelength. Electrons are absorbing Energy means the Electrons are going to excited state from its ground state. Electrons are going to excited state from its ground state means the material is having band gap, thus which can be determine by absorption wavelength.

Energy Equation of Quantum Mechanics:

Energy (E) = Planks Constant (h) * Speed of Light (C) / Wavelength (λ)

Where, Energy (E) = Band gap, Planks constant (h) = 6.626×10^-34 Joules sec, Velocity of Light (C) = 2.99×10^8 meter/sec and Wavelength (λ) = Absorption peak value. Also 1eV = 1.6×10^-19 Joules (Conversion factor)

By this formula band gap can be calculated easily, from UV Vis spectroscopy absorption peak.

The basis of the spectrophotometer
In general, the amount of light absorbed by a substance in a liquid state is directly related to the concentration of that substance in the liquid. If the sample is solid, it must first be dissolved in a clear solvent to be measurable. The sample solvent (known as the control) is usually considered without adsorption or in practice its partial adsorption is less than the total adsorption (sample with solvent). The sample with the solvent is usually poured into a clear glass container or a quartz container and placed in front of the light passing through the spectrophotometer. This dish is called Cell or Quvette. Of course, using add-ons on the spectrometer device, solid or gas samples can also be analyzed, which will be discussed in detail in the articles of this article.

The spectrophotometer uses a tungsten lamp to produce visible light and a deuterium lamp to produce ultraviolet or UV light. The normally measured wavelength range in this device is from 1100 nm to 190 nm. More equipped devices are usually used to measure areas outside this range. Given that a particular molecule may absorb light in a well-defined region of the wavelength range, the light produced must be separated and adjustable to the component wavelengths in a given region. Grating Mirror or prism mirror is used to uniformize the light in the spectrophotometer.

Parts of the ultraviolet and visible spectrometer
the source of light
Prism or grating mirror
Monochromator
Detector, detector or photodiode
Processor
The following figure shows an overview of how this device works.

Visible ultraviolet spectrophotometer
Spectrophotometer device diagram

In the visible and ultraviolet spectrometer, after the light passes through the solution, the remaining light sample is inside a detector of Photomultiplier or Photodiode type and after computer processing as a number of one hundred as the percentage of light transmission or its logarithm with The title of the light absorption number appears on the display. Calculations of light absorption or transmission follow Lambert Beer’s law. Mathematically, the amount of light I0 passes through an environment with length X and concentration C, the intensity of the residual light I after passing through the environment is:
I = I0e-KCX
In this relation, K will be a relative constant (absorption coefficient). Therefore, the absorption of the environment or A is obtained as follows:
A = log (I0 / I) = KCX

Spectrophotometer is available in two types of single beam single beam and double beam double beam. The single beam system compares the light absorbed after placing the sample in the device with the main light before placing the sample in the device. One of the advantages of this system is its simplicity, smallness and cheapness, and one of its disadvantages is a small error due to the instability of the measurement environment.

But the two-beam system has two beams, one of which goes to the detector at the same time and the other passes through the sample and the difference between the two is calculated. One of the advantages of this system is more accuracy compared to the single-beam system, and its disadvantages are its complexity and more expensive price. The image below is a schematic of a 2-ray spectrophotometer.

Depending on the spectral region in which the spectral region is performed and which radiation properties (absorption, emission, transmission, scattering, reflection, etc.) are examined, the type of electronic transmissions and consequently the type of spectroscopy and device will be different.
In nasal spectroscopy, absorption is a process in which a chemical species in a transparent medium selectively attenuates (reduces its intensity) certain frequencies of electromagnetic radiation. In the ultraviolet / visible region, the energy of electromagnetic radiation is such that it causes electron transitions in valence electrons. For atoms and ions in the elemental state, the energy of each level is due to the movement of electrons around the nucleus. These states of energy are called electronic states. In addition to having electron energy levels, molecules also have vibrational energy levels and rotational energy levels. These alignments result from the vibration between the atoms in the molecule and from the rotation of the molecules around their own center of mass in space, respectively. In the energy level level diagram, several rotational levels are placed between the two vibrational levels and several vibrational levels are placed between the electronic level levels. Accordingly, each electronic level has vibrating levels and each vibrating level in turn has its own rotational levels. Each of these energy states is about ten times smaller than each other

Only 8$ for interpretation of your EDS spectrum 
and 10$ per sample for interpreting of your SEM/TEM micrograghs
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

1- DTSA-II

DTSA-II is a multi-platform software package for quantitative x-ray microanalysis. DTSA-II was inspired by the popular Desktop Spectrum Analyzer (DTSA) package developed by Chuck Fiori, Carol Swyt-Thomas, and Bob Myklebust at NIST and NIH in the ’80’s and early ’90’s.

DTSA-II has being designed with the goal of making standards-based microanalysis more accessible for the novice microanalyst. We want to encourage standards-based analysis by making it as easy as possible to get reliable results. Many operations which had previously required user intervention under DTSA now are performed entirely by the software. Furthermore, the software attempts to guide the user step-by-step through common processes while performing quality control sanity checks. While this might not provide the flexibility that some sophisticated users may desire, we feel that this philosophy is more consistent with the way laboratories are moving towards technicians responsible for multiple techniques and away from experts in single techiques. We encourage users who desire the additional power and flexibility available in the EPQ library to learn to script using Jython or to create their own alternative user interface. EPQ is much more capable than the fraction exposed via DTSA-II.

DTSA-II is based on an entirely new code base written by Nicholas W. M. Ritchie. The codebase has been carefully divided into a shared algorithm library which forms the basis for a handful of software products and a user interface shell. DTSA-II is the user interface shell and the EPQ library is the algorithm library.

DTSA-II remains under active development. Many features – some fairly basic – remain unimplemented. Other features have not been tested as much as the developer might like. The program made available to the public via this web site represents the current best available version in the judgement of the developer. DTSA-II remains experimental software and no representations are made regarding the suitability of the product for any particular application.

Major features:

• Basic IO and Display
  • Read energy dispersive x-ray spectra in a variety of different commercial and non-commercial formats including the industry standard EMSA format
  • Display and overlay spectra with various scaling options on linear/log/sqrt axes
  • Copy/save/print the spectrum display as a bitmap/PNG file
  • Output the spectra as a GNUPlot file for publication quality output
  • Overlay labeled x-ray emission lines and x-ray absorption edges
  • Define and integrate regions-of-interest
  • View spectrum contextual information
  • Archive spectra to a searchable database
  • Sub-sampling of spectral data to simulate shorter acquisition times
  • Basic spectrum math functions
  • Background modeling or background stripping
  • Energy axis linearization
  • Spectrum smoothing
  • Peak removal (trimming)
  • Peak search / identification
• Spectrum Simulation
  • Analytical (φ(ρz)) simulations of energy dispersive x-ray spectra
    • Normal or oblique incidence angle
    • Variable beam energies, beam fluxes, materials
  • Monte carlo simulations of energy dispersive x-ray spectra
    • Spectra from bulk samples
    • Mounted or unmounted thin films
    • Cubical or spherical particles with or without a substrate
  • Simulated spectra may be manipulated as experimental spectra
  • Variety of detector options including Si(Li), SDD and microcalorimeter
• Standards-based Quantification
  • Standards-based quantification of EDS spectra
  • Filter-fit linear-least squares fitting of reference spectra
  • Quantification based on references or like-standards
  • φ(ρz) correction of the k-ratios
  • ζ-factor correction of thin-film samples
  • Results reported as HTML with estimates of uncertainty
• Reporting
  • Actions are recorded in a daily HTML activity report
  • Report may be opened in an alternative HTML viewer
• Platforms and Source Code
  • DTSA-II is based on the EPQ library – a full-featured library of electron probe quantification algorithms
  • DTSA-II only exposes a fraction of the power within the EPQ library. The remainder may be accessed via custom Java applications or via Jython scripting.
  • The EPQ library includes the full NISTMonte for Monte Carlo simulation of electron/x-ray transport
  • DTSA-II / EPQ library are available as source code
  • DTSA-II / EPQ library are written in Java SE 6 compatible source
  • DTSA-II / EPQ library can execute on any platform supporting Java SE 6 or later
  • DTSA-II / EPQ library is regularly tested on Windows XP, Ubuntu Linux & Apple OS X

Disclaimer

This software was developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology by employees of the Federal Government in the course of their official duties. Pursuant to title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code this software is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. DTSA and the EPQ library are experimental systems. NIST assumes no responsibility whatsoever for its use by other parties, and makes no guarantees, expressed or implied, about its quality, reliability, or any other characteristic. We would appreciate acknowledgement if the software is used. This software can be redistributed and/or modified freely. The author requests that any derivative works bear some notice that they are derived from it, and any modified versions bear some notice that they have been modified.

Any mention of commercial products is for information only; it does not imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST nor does it imply that the products mentioned are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

See: https://cstl.nist.gov/div837/837.02/epq/dtsa2/

2. HyperSpy

HyperSpy is an open source Python library which provides tools to facilitate the interactive data analysis of multi-dimensional datasets that can be described as multi-dimensional arrays of a given signal (e.g. a 2D array of spectra a.k.a spectrum image). HyperSpy aims at making it easy and natural to apply analytical procedures that operate on an individual signal to multi-dimensional arrays, as well as providing easy access to analytical tools that exploit the multi-dimensionality of the dataset. Its modular structure makes it easy to add features to analyze different kinds of signals.

Highlights

• Two families of named and scaled axes: signal and navigation.
• Visualization tools for multi-dimensional spectra and images.
• Easy access multi-dimensional curve fitting and blind source separation.
• Built on top of NumPy, SciPy, matplotlib and scikit-learn.
• Modular design for easy extensibility.

The development has been motivated by the data analysis needs of the electron microscopy community but it is proving useful in many other fields.

See: https://hyperspy.org/

3. AZtec

• AZtecFeature is an innovative particle analysis system specifically optimised for usability and high-speed throughput. It combines the raw speed and sensitivity of the Ultim Max Silicon Drift Detector with the superior analytical performance and ease of use of the AZtec® EDS analysis suite to create the most advanced automated particle analysis platform on the market. Gunshot Residue Analysis in the SEM with AZtecGSR is fast and accurate: it gives reproducible Gunshot Residue Analysis results to ASTM E1588 – 10e1.
• AZtecGSR combines ease of use through its guided workflow, with the ultimate accuracy using the latest Ultim Max detectors and Tru-Q® algorithms. LayerProbe is an exciting software tool for thin film analysis in the SEM. An option for the AZtec EDS microanalysis system, LayerProbe is faster, more cost-effective and higher resolution than dedicated thin film measurement tools.The most powerful EBSD software available, AZtecHKL combines speed and accuracy of results for routine analysis, with the flexibility and power required for applications that push the frontiers of EBSD.
• AZtec3D combines simultaneous EDS and EBSD data acquisition & analysis with the automated milling capabilities of a FIB-SEM.AZtecLiveOne software platform is the ideal solution for carrying out a complex task like EDS as quickly and as easily as possible. No need for substantial training or advanced knowledge of the EDS technique. Users can be trained in a matter of minutes and will have complete confidence in their results. AZtecTEM is an innovative EDS software specifically optimised for advanced TEM applications. AZtecSynergy provides a powerful solution for the simultaneous collection of EDS and EBSD data. All of the tools to collect excellent integrated data are included in one place with no complicated switching from one navigator to another.
• AZtecSteel is an automated steel inclusion analysis package developed specifically for the analysis and classification of steel inclusions using Energy Dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDS) in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). It detects, measures and analyses the inclusions, processes the resulting data set to published standard methods, and includes functionality to plot complex ternary diagrams. AZtecLive is a revolutionary new approach to EDS analysis that enables a radical change in the way users perform sample investigation in the SEM. It combines a live electron image with live X-ray chemical imaging to give an intuitive new way of interacting with your samples. Collecting good quality data is only the beginning of any complete EBSD analysis. AZtecCrystal provides all the necessary tools to process and interrogate your EBSD data and to solve your materials problems. Seamlessly integrated with AZtecHKL or operated as a standalone program, AZtecCrystal sets the standard in EBSD data processing for experts and novices alike.
• AZtecAM is a powerful, automated, solution for the analysis of metal powders used in additive manufacturing. Based on AZtecFeature, AZtecAM optimises the particle analysis workflow to enable the rapid and accurate characterisation of metal powders. AZtecMineral is a powerful, automated, Mineral Liberation Analysis solution. It enables ore characterisation, provides vital data on metal recovery and enables process yield characterisation using multipurpose SEMs. It is also a valuable tool for the characterisation of rocks in research environments, enabling the automation of otherwise laborious optical analyses.

See: https://engineering.virginia.edu/oxford-instruments-offering-free-aztec-suite-software-electron-microscopy-analysis

4. ESPRIT Family

ESPRIT 2 unites four analytical methods under a single user interface. These include EDS for SEM and (S)TEM, WDS, Micro-XRF for SEM and EBSD. This makes it easy for the user to switch between methods with a single mouse click. Additionally, it facilitates combining different method results from the same sample area and to so gain much more information. To name only the most important, coupling of following methods is supported:

• EDS and EBSD
• EDS and WDS
• EDS and Micro-XRF for SEM

The software is designed to suit the needs of all levels of users – from beginner to expert. Novices will benefit from the assistants that help performing routine tasks without having to learn details of the measurement method. More experienced users will value the option to drill down deeper, when they need it, meaning both detailed setup of measurements as well as in-depth analysis of results and automation of tasks.

See: https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/elemental-analyzers/eds-wds-ebsd-SEM-Micro-XRF/software-esprit-family.html

Only 8$ per sample for interpreting of your EDS spectrum 
and 10$ per sample for interpreting of your SEM/TEM micrograghs
Payment Upon Completion

Send your results...

Interaction of an electron beam with a sample target produces a variety of emissions, including x-rays. An energy-dispersive (EDS) detector is used to separate the characteristic x-rays of different elements into an energy spectrum, and EDS system software is used to analyze the energy spectrum in order to determine the abundance of specific elements. EDS can be used to find the chemical composition of materials down to a spot size of a few microns, and to create element composition maps over a much broader raster area. Together, these capabilities provide fundamental compositional information for a wide variety of materials.

How it Works – EDS

EDS systems are typically integrated into either an SEM or EPMA instrument. EDS systems include a sensitive x-ray detector, a liquid nitrogen dewar for cooling, and software to collect and analyze energy spectra. The detector is mounted in the sample chamber of the main instrument at the end of a long arm, which is itself cooled by liquid nitrogen. The most common detectors are made of Si(Li) crystals that operate at low voltages to improve sensitivity, but recent advances in detector technology make availabale so-called “silicon drift detectors” that operate at higher count rates without liquid nitrogen cooling.

An EDS detector contains a crystal that absorbs the energy of incoming x-rays by ionization, yielding free electrons in the crystal that become conductive and produce an electrical charge bias. The x-ray absorption thus converts the energy of individual x-rays into electrical voltages of proportional size; the electrical pulses correspond to the characteristic x-rays of the element.

Strengths

• When used in “spot” mode, a user can acquire a full elemental spectrum in only a few seconds. Supporting software makes it possible to readily identify peaks, which makes EDS a great survey tool to quickly identify unknown phases prior to quantitative analysis.
• EDS can be used in semi-quantitative mode to determine chemical composition by peak-height ratio relative to a standard.

Limitations

• There are energy peak overlaps among different elements, particularly those corresponding to x-rays generated by emission from different energy-level shells (K, L and M) in different elements. For example, there are close overlaps of Mn-K_α and Cr-K_β, or Ti-K_α and various L lines in Ba. Particularly at higher energies, individual peaks may correspond to several different elements; in this case, the user can apply deconvolution methods to try peak separation, or simply consider which elements make “most sense” given the known context of the sample.
• Because the wavelength-dispersive (WDS) method is more precise and capable of detecting lower elemental abundances, EDS is less commonly used for actual chemical analysis although improvements in detector resolution make EDS a reliable and precise alternative.
• EDS cannot detect the lightest elements, typically below the atomic number of Na for detectors equipped with a Be window. Polymer-based thin windows allow for detection of light elements, depending on the instrument and operating conditions.

Results

A typical EDS spectrum is portrayed as a plot of x-ray counts vs. energy (in keV). Energy peaks correspond to the various elements in the sample. Generally they are narrow and readily resolved, but many elements yield multiple peaks. For example, iron commonly shows strong K_α and K_βpeaks. Elements in low abundance will generate x-ray peaks that may not be resolvable from the background radiation.

EDS spectrum of multi-element glass (NIST K309) containing O, Al, Si, Ca, Ba and Fe (Goldstein et al., 2003). 

EDS spectrum of biotite, containing detectable Mg, Al, Si, K, Ti and Fe (from Goodge, 2003). 

References

• Severin, Kenneth P., 2004, Energy Dispersive Spectrometry of Common Rock Forming Minerals. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 225 p.–Highly recommended reference book of representative EDS spectra of the rock-forming minerals, as well as practical tips for spectral acquisition and interpretation.
• Goldstein, J. (2003) Scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis. Kluwer Adacemic/Plenum Pulbishers, 689 p.
• Reimer, L. (1998) Scanning electron microscopy : physics of image formation and microanalysis. Springer, 527 p.
• Egerton, R. F. (2005) Physical principles of electron microscopy : an introduction to TEM, SEM, and AEM. Springer, 202.
• Clarke, A. R. (2002) Microscopy techniques for materials science. CRC Press (electronic resource)

Related Links

• Petroglyph–An atlas of images using electron microscope, backscattered electron images, element maps, energy dispersive x-ray spectra, and petrographic microscope– Eric Chrisensen, Brigham Young University
• SEM/EDX webpage from Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne

Only 8$ per sample for interpreting of your EDS spectrum 
and 10$ per sample for interpreting of your SEM/TEM micrograghs
Payment Upon Completion

Send your results...

X-ray is a kind of electromagnetic wave, the same as light. The wavelength of visible light is 400 to 800nm, while the wavelength of x-ray is much shorter (higher energy), at 0.001nm to 10nm, and is known to have strong penetrating power.

Fig. 1 shows the interactions between a material and X-ray, and various analysis methods that make use of these interactions. These interactions provide important clues for learning the state of a material. As a familiar example, an X-ray image for medical application is a well-known use of transmission X-ray. Here we will introduce an elemental analysis method called fluorescent X-ray spectrometry.

Fig.1 Analytical methods and its application interaction of X-ray and matter

Fluorescent X-ray Spectrometry

When irradiating X-rays onto a material, fluorescent X-ray (characteristic X-ray), which has energy (wavelength) unique to the element that composes the material will be generated. When we measure the fluorescent X-ray energy, the contained element is identified (qualitative analysis), and we can calculate the concentration (quantitative analysis) from the intensity of the fluorescent X-ray of each element. Thus, the qualitative or quantitative analyses of a material by irradiating X-rays onto an unknown material and analyzing the fluorescent X-ray that is generated, is called fluorescent X-ray spectrometry.

There are two types of fluorescent X-ray spectrometry; the wavelength dispersive type (WDXRF) using analyzing crystals, and the energy dispersive type (EDXRF) using semiconductor detectors (EDS).

Comparison between Energy Dispersive Type and Wavelength Dispersive Type Spectrometers

The characteristics of a wavelength dispersive type spectrometer (WDXRF) are high sensitivity, high accuracy, high resolution, and high reproducibility. We can expect sensitivity and accuracy at levels one order of magnitude higher than those of the energy dispersive type spectrometer (EDXRF). These characteristics are provided by a high-power X-ray tube (3 to 4 kW) and its cooling device, a goniometer which makes complicated movements and an exchange mechanism for the analyzing crystal and detector and so on. Naturally, the instruments are larger, with a complicated structure and high price. The specimen surface is required to be flat and the available analysis area is from several mm to 30mm or so. This type of device is suitable for process management where specimens with the same form are analyzed one after another.

The characteristics of the energy dispersive type spectrometer (EDXRF) are simple structure and low price, its adaptability to a variety of specimens, and its user-friendliness. The X-ray bulb is compact (several tens W) and air-cooled, and since the EDS (semiconductor detector) itself performs the analysis, a complicated spectroscopy section is not necessary.

The roughness or shape of specimen does not matter, so analysis of large specimens or micro areas is possible. Each characteristic is shown in Fig. 2. The images are the large instrument for WDXRF, and the compact simple instrument for EDXRF.

Wavelength Dispersive Type (WDXRF) Advantages: High Sensitivity, High Resolution High Accuracy, High Reproducibility Disadvantages: Complicated and large-sized, high price Specimen is limited to flat platesEnergy Dispersive Type (EDXRF) Advantages: Simple Operation, compact, low price Flexibility in specimen shape Disadvantages: Low resolution (overlapped peaks) Cooling mechanism requiring liquid nitrogen or the like

Fig.2 Comparison between Wavelength Dispersive Type (WDXRF) and Energy Dispersive Type (EDXRF)

Sampling of Solid/Powder/Liquid Samples

One of the characteristics of EDXRF is the ease of use. Sampling of solid, powder, and liquid samples is explained below.

Sampling of Solid Sample

Analysis of a solid sample is possible by simply placing the sample at the X-ray illumination position.

In case of small sample, use of a dedicated cell will make it easier to set the sample. Fig. 3 shows a simplified illustration of the solid sample sampling method.

Fig.3 Sampling of Solid Sample

Sampling of Powder Sample (rock, soil, incinerated ash, etc)

Powder samples are typically analyzed by producing a pellet using a compression device. As a simplified method, analysis is possible on the powder placed into a specially-designed cell. Fig. 4 shows a simplified illustration of the powder sample sampling method.

Fig.4 Sampling of Powder Sample

Sampling of Liquid Sample

For liquid samples, a dedicated cell is used. Fill a dedicated cell with the liquid and analyze. In addition, there is another method where you can drop liquid onto a filter, dry it, and then analyze it. Fig. 5 shows a simplified illustration of liquid sample sampling methods.

Fig.5 Sampling of Liquid Sample

FP Quantitative Method / Film Thickness Analysis of Thin Film Sample

FP (fundamental parameter) quantitative method

The EDXRF instrument employs a theoretical calculation method called the FP quantitative method, allowing quantitative analysis of an unknown sample without the need for a standard sample.
The FP quantitative method assumes that the sample is uniform, sufficiently large and thick, and that all elements (100% in total) are quantified. Naturally, a sample must satisfy these assumptions, so attention is needed.The flow chart of FP quantitative method is shown in Fig. 6.

Fig.6 The flow chart of FP quantitative method

Flow Chart Explanation

1. First, measure the unknown sample and obtain the measurement intensity.
2. Assume the initial concentration of the sample and obtain a calculated intensity using the FP method.
3. Compare the measurement intensity and the calculated intensity.
4. Change the assumed concentration so that the measurement intensity and the calculated intensity match.
5. Obtain a new calculated intensity with the new assumed concentration using the FP method.
6. Repeat steps 3 to 5.
7. The assumed concentration that gives a calculated concentration that matches the measurement concentration is the analysis result.

Film Thickness Analysis of Thin Film Sample

In the case of a thin film sample, there is a correlation between the x-ray intensity of the elements composing the film and the film thickness. Therefore, by irradiating X-rays onto the surface of a thin film and measuring the X-ray intensity of the elements composing the film, the film thickness can be analyzed without destroying it.

A Single layer film can be analyzed using a calibration curve, but with the calibration curve method, a standard sample must be prepared for each kind of film. When the thin film FP quantitative method is used, it is not only possible to analyze single layer films, but also to analyze the thickness and composition of each layer in a multi-layer thin film, up to 5 layers , without a standard sample, which is very convenient. Fig. 7 shows a diagram of the thin film FP method, Fig. 8 shows a measurement example of Au/Ni/Cu film.

Thin Film FP (fundamental parameter) method

• Simultaneous non-destructive analysis of thickness and composition of thin film
• Up to 5 layers, and up to 20 elements for each layer
• Film thickness of about 10nm to 10μm (differs depending on element)
• Standard sample is not necessary (theoretical calculation)
• Information of layering order, elements, and density of the film is needed.

Fig.7 Schematic diagram of a thin film FP method

Fig.8 Measurement of the film Au / Ni / Cu thin film FP method

Only 15$ per sample for interpreting of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is an incredibly powerful tool for characterizing molecular structures. When submitting to the FDA or other regulatory agencies, full structural characterization by NMR provides crucial evidence of compound identity. A combination of 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional NMR experiments are necessary for complete confidence in chemical structure.

This post will walk you through the steps to fully characterize a molecule by 1- and 2-dimensional NMR, including on how to perform NMR interpretation.

Step 1: ¹H-NMR

The first step in structural characterization is 1-dimensional proton ¹H-NMR. The chemical shift, multiplicity, coupling constants, and integration are all factors to consider when assigning protons. In this example, only three protons can be assigned by the proton spectrum alone: protons 3, 4, and 6.

To begin, let’s start with proton 3. Proton 3 is the only methyl group in the structure, and therefore must integrate to 3 protons. The only peak with an integration of 3 is the doublet at 1.770 ppm. The high field chemical shift supports this assignment. The peak is split into a doublet with a coupling constant of 1.2 Hz, reflecting the long-range coupling between protons 3 and 4, which also supports this assignment.

Protons that are coupled to each other should exhibit the same coupling constant. The long-range coupling constant observed for proton 3 (J=1.2 Hz, split into a doublet by proton 4) is reflected in the coupling constant for proton 4 (J=1.2 Hz, split into a quartet by proton 3). Therefore, the peak at 7.690 ppm must represent proton 4! The integration and chemical shift support the assignment, as proton 4 is the only aromatic proton in the structure.

There is only one singlet in the ¹H-NMR spectrum. The only proton that should show up as a singlet is proton 6, as it has no neighboring protons that would split the peak (the nearest proton is 5 bonds away!). The chemical shift of 11.256 ppm supports this assignment, as imide protons often show up far downfield. The peak also integrates to 1 proton, supporting the assignment.

The remaining protons are doublets, triplets, and multiplets that can be assigned by 2-dimensional COSY.

Step 2: ¹H-¹H COSY

¹H-¹H Correlation Spectroscopy (COSY) shows the correlation between hydrogens which are coupled to each other in the ¹H NMR spectrum. The ¹H spectrum is plotted on both 2D axes. While 2-bond and 3-bond ¹H-¹H coupling is easily visible by COSY, long range coupling can also be observed with long acquisition times. The cross-peaks (not on the diagonal) that are symmetric to the diagonal show the COSY correlations. For example, protons 3 and 4 are coupled to each other, since they form a box pattern symmetric to the diagonal. This confirms assignments 3 and 4 made from the proton spectrum alone.

Two types of COSY coupling: 3-bond short range coupling between protons 7 and 8 (red) and 4-bond long range coupling between protons 3 and 4 (blue).

My favorite way to analyze a COSY spectrum with many unassigned protons is to make a table of correlations, like the one seen here. Look at the table for any clear differences in correlation and begin there! In this example, all unassigned protons show one or two COSY correlations-except the proton at 4.233 ppm, which correlates to threeother protons by COSY. The only proton expected to correlate with three nonequivalent protons is proton 9!

Now that proton 9 has been assigned, the fun really begins. Thymidine’s structure suggests that proton 9 should couple protons 8, 10, and 11. Based on the COSY, proton 9 couples protons at 2.068 ppm (2H), 3.754 ppm (1H), and 5.209 ppm (1H). From this list, we can easily assign proton 8 as the peak at 2.068 ppm based on its integration of 2 protons. To differentiate protons 10 and 11, take a look at our COSY table; 3.754 ppm shows two COSY correlations, while 5.209 ppm only shows one. Therefore, we can assign proton 10 as 5.209 ppm and proton 11 as 3.754 ppm.

Once proton 8 has been assigned, we can easily assign proton 7 based on the remaining COSY correlation for proton 8. Proton 7’s peak at 6.163 ppm is split into a triplet by the two 8 protons, confirming the assignment.

All that remains are protons 12 and 13. We can assign proton 12 (3.564 ppm) based on its integration of 2H and its COSY correlation to proton 11. The last remaining peak at 4.999 ppm must be proton 13; this is confirmed by COSY correlation with proton 12, triplet multiplicity based on splitting by proton 12, and integration of one proton.

Now we have a fully assigned ¹H-NMR spectrum! This spectrum will help us assign our carbons using HSQC and HMBC NMR spectroscopy.

Step 3: ¹³C-NMR

Carbon NMR is a necessary step in full structural characterization. However, ¹³C-NMR alone does not provide enough information to assign the carbons in the molecule. The NMR spectrum below does confirm the number of carbons in the molecule; however, HSQC and HMBC (we will get to these soon!) are necessary to assign the carbons with confidence. Note that one of the carbons is hidden beneath the solvent signal but is clearly visible after zooming into that region.

Step 4: DEPT-45, 90, and 135

Distortionless Enhancement of Polarization Transfer (DEPT) experiments help assign carbon peaks by determining the number of protons attached to each carbon. For very simple molecules, DEPT may be enough to partially or fully assign all carbons. In complex molecules, DEPT and HSQC together are useful for confirming both carbon and proton assignments. For example, the DEPT experiments below can only identify carbon 3-it is the only CH₃ peak. I always go back and use DEPT to confirm the carbons I assigned by HSQC.

• DEPT-45 shows CH, CH₂, and CH₃ carbons as positive peaks. Carbons with no protons are not visible.
• DEPT-90 shows only CH peaks as positive peaks. Carbons with no protons, CH₂, and CH₃ carbons are not visible.
• DEPT-135 shows CH and CH₃ carbons as positive peaks and CH₂ carbons as negative peaks. Carbons with no protons are not visible.

Step 5: ¹H-¹³C HSQC

¹H-¹³C Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence Spectroscopy (HSQC) shows which hydrogens are directly attached to which carbon atoms. The ¹H spectrum is shown on the horizontal axis and the ¹³C spectrum is shown on the vertical axis. The HSQC spectrum is most valuable when protons have already been assigned.

For example, HSQC shows a correlation between proton 4 and the carbon at 136.113 ppm; this carbon is now assigned as carbon 4. Carbons 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12 are assigned by HSQC. Only 1-bond correlations are observed, so HSQC assignments are relatively straightforward. The DEPT experiments also confirm these assignments. HSQC is also useful in confirming proton assignments of nitrogen or oxygen-bound protons; they show no signal by HSQC. This further supports the assignments of protons 6, 10, and 13.

An example correlation between proton and carbon 4 is observed by HSQC.

Step 6: ¹H-¹³C HMBC

¹H-¹³C Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation Spectroscopy (HMBC) shows the correlations between protons and carbons that are separated by multiple bonds. The ¹H spectrum is shown on the horizontal axis and the ¹³C spectrum is shown on the vertical axis. Correlated atoms are shown in blue and the connecting atoms are shown in red. Note that direct hydrogen-carbon bonds (1-bond correlations) are generally not seen. For example, hydrogen 4 shows correlations with carbons 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7, but not carbon 4.

HMBC interactions between proton 4 and carbons 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.

HMBC is incredibly useful for assigning carbons that have no protons attached. In this example, carbons 1, 2, and 5 have no protons attached. Carbon 1 is assigned by HMBC interactions with protons 3, 4, and 6; carbon 2 by interaction with protons 3, 4, 6, and 7; and carbon 5 by interactions with protons 4 and 7 only. The chemical environment of carbon 5 suggests it would appear more downfield than carbon 1, which confirms these assignments.

HMBC also confirms assignments that were based solely on the proton and COSY spectrum. For example, protons 10 and 13 are differentiated by HMBC; proton 10 is confirmed by interactions with carbons 8, 9, and 11, while proton 13 is confirmed by interactions with 11 and 12. HMBC supports all proton and all carbon assignments, unambiguously confirming both the structure and analysis of thymidine.

At Emery Pharma, we are experts in 1D and 2D NMR characterization and structure elucidation; in fact, 2D NMR projects are some of our favorites! We have supported numerous pharmaceutical companies in full NMR characterization for API submissions to regulatory agencies, as well as complete structure elucidation of impurities. We provide a fully annotated report with images similar to those seen here and support our results with high resolution mass spectrometry and elemental analysis. 

Some nuclei rotate around their axis like electrons. In the presence of an external magnetic field, a rotating nucleus has only a small number of stable orientations. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) occurs when a spinning core is excited from a lower energy orientation to a higher energy orientation in the presence of a magnetic field by absorbing enough electromagnetic radiation. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy involves measuring the amount of energy required to change spin nuclei from a stable orientation to a more unstable orientation in a magnetic field. Because spin-core nuclei change direction in a magnetic field at different frequencies, different frequencies of absorbing radiation are needed to change the orientation of spin-core nuclei. The frequency at which the absorption takes place is used for analysis and spectroscopy [1].

Nuclear magnetic resonance was first discovered independently in 1946 by Felix Bloch of Stanford University and Edward Parcel of Harvard University. They were able to show the absorption of electromagnetic radiation as a result of the transfer of the energy level of the nucleus in a strong magnetic field. The two physicists won the Nobel Prize in 1952 for their work. In the first five years after the discovery of the nuclear magnetic resonance method, chemists discovered that the molecular environment of objects affects the absorption of radiation by nuclei in the presence of a magnetic field, and this effect could be related to the structure of the molecule. Since then, the growth of magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been explosive and this method has had a significant effect on the development of organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry and biochemistry [2]. In 1999, a team of Canadian physicists developed a new method using the Beta Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Method, which is capable of demonstrating the magnetic and electrical properties of very thin layers and surfaces. BetaNMR methods are used in nanoscience. Be [3].

The magnitude of the spin angle motion in the nuclei is determined by the quantum number of the nucleus spin. Quantum number The core spin of any number can be integer or semi-integer. In 16 O and 12C non-spin nuclei, the quantum spin number of the nucleus is zero. Cores that are not spin and therefore do not have the magnitude of the spin angle motion can not be detected by NMR spectroscopy. Spin-core cores with spherical charge distribution have a spin quantum number of 1/2. Examples of these nuclei include 13C, 19F, 3H, 15N, 31P and 1H, which have a quantum number of 1/2 and a magnetic moment. In order for a nucleus in a magnetic field to absorb a large amount of electromagnetic radiation, it must have a high frequency in the sample and also have a relatively large magnetic moment (µ). Cores that have both properties in question include 1H, 19F, 21P. Most NMR measurements are usually performed for 1 h. Measurements of other nuclei are often performed using signal amplification methods to observe the spectrum. Usually, among the nuclei with low relative frequency that show the magnetic resonance of the nucleus, 12 C, 15N, 16O are the most important for chemists. The magnetic resonance method of the hydrogen nucleus (1H), which is used more than other nuclei, has a magnetic torque of about 79.2 برای. It will be magnetic. For other cores used for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, the magnetic torque for 21P, 19F 12C is 6873.2, 1305.1 and 0.7022, respectively [4]. In most cases, the sensitivity of non-proton core magnetic resonance devices, such as 12C, etc., is lower than that of HNMR. Also, in most compounds, the natural abundance of non-proton magnetic nuclei is significantly lower than that of protons. This factor causes the NMR spectra of non-proton nuclei to have a relatively low noise signal. The peaks of these spectra are small, and often the spectrum cannot be determined if the same device used for proton nucleus (PMR) NMR is used. Due to the low signal-to-noise ratio in these cases, most devices designed to record the NMR spectra of non-proton nuclei use multiple traverses with signal averaging techniques. The most common devices for spectral peak extraction use the Fourier transform. Fourier transformers are also used to prepare PMR spectra of dilute solutions and complex molecules, such as proteins, in which the amount of a particular proton in the molecule is small. The difference between PMR spectra and other NMR spectra is in the range of chemical displacement. The chemical displacement range for PMR is 10PPM in most cases. While for the 12C core the chemical displacement is up to about 200PPM, for the 19F and 21P spectra it is 300 and 400PPM, respectively. In NMR methods, the units used are usually time (seconds), angle (degrees or radians), temperature (Kelvin), magnetic field strength (Tesla, T), energy (joules), vibration (rpm) and power ( Watts) is. [5] Components of the NMR Device The important components of an NMR spectrometer are shown schematically in Figure (1). A brief description of each component is given below.

Only 15$ per sample for interpreting of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Over the past fifty years nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, commonly referred to as nmr, has become the preeminent technique for determining the structure of organic compounds. Of all the spectroscopic methods, it is the only one for which a complete analysis and interpretation of the entire spectrum is normally expected. Although larger amounts of sample are needed than for mass spectroscopy, nmr is non-destructive, and with modern instruments good data may be obtained from samples weighing less than a milligram. To be successful in using nmr as an analytical tool, it is necessary to understand the physical principles on which the methods are based.

The nuclei of many elemental isotopes have a characteristic spin (I). Some nuclei have integral spins (e.g. I = 1, 2, 3 ….), some have fractional spins (e.g. I = 1/2, 3/2, 5/2 ….), and a few have no spin, I = 0 (e.g. ¹²C, ¹⁶O, ³²S, ….). Isotopes of particular interest and use to organic chemists are ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁹F and ³¹P, all of which have I = 1/2. Since the analysis of this spin state is fairly straightforward, our discussion of nmr will be limited to these and other I = 1/2 nuclei.

The following features lead to the nmr phenomenon:

1. A spinning charge generates a magnetic field, as shown by the animation on the right. The resulting spin-magnet has a magnetic moment (μ) proportional to the spin.
2. In the presence of an external magnetic field (B0), two spin states exist, +1/2 and -1/2. The magnetic moment of the lower energy +1/2 state is aligned with the external field, but that of the higher energy -1/2 spin state is opposed to the external field. Note that the arrow representing the external field points North.
3. The difference in energy between the two spin states is dependent on the external magnetic field strength, and is always very small. The following diagram illustrates that the two spin states have the same energy when the external field is zero, but diverge as the field increases. At a field equal to Bx a formula for the energy difference is given (remember I = 1/2 and μ is the magnetic moment of the nucleus in the field).
Strong magnetic fields are necessary for nmr spectroscopy. The international unit for magnetic flux is the tesla (T). The earth’s magnetic field is not constant, but is approximately 10-4 T at ground level. Modern nmr spectrometers use powerful magnets having fields of 1 to 20 T. Even with these high fields, the energy difference between the two spin states is less than 0.1 cal/mole. To put this in perspective, recall that infrared transitions involve 1 to 10 kcal/mole and electronic transitions are nearly 100 time greater. For nmr purposes, this small energy difference (ΔE) is usually given as a frequency in units of MHz (106 Hz), ranging from 20 to 900 Mz, depending on the magnetic field strength and the specific nucleus being studied. Irradiation of a sample with radio frequency (rf) energy corresponding exactly to the spin state separation of a specific set of nuclei will cause excitation of those nuclei in the +1/2 state to the higher -1/2 spin state. Note that this electromagnetic radiation falls in the radio and television broadcast spectrum. Nmr spectroscopy is therefore the energetically mildest probe used to examine the structure of molecules.  The nucleus of a hydrogen atom (the proton) has a magnetic moment μ = 2.7927, and has been studied more than any other nucleus. The previous diagram may be changed to display energy differences for the proton spin states (as frequencies) by mouse clicking anywhere within it.
4. For spin 1/2 nuclei the energy difference between the two spin states at a given magnetic field strength will be proportional to their magnetic moments. For the four common nuclei noted above, the magnetic moments are: 1H μ = 2.7927, 19F μ = 2.6273, 31P μ = 1.1305 & 13C μ = 0.7022. These moments are in nuclear magnetons, which are 5.05078•10-27 JT-1. The following diagram gives the approximate frequencies that correspond to the spin state energy separations for each of these nuclei in an external magnetic field of 2.35 T. The formula in the colored box shows the direct correlation of frequency (energy difference) with magnetic moment (h = Planck’s constant = 6.626069•10-34 Js).

      2. Proton NMR Spectroscopy
This important and well-established application of nuclear magnetic resonance will serve to illustrate some of the novel aspects of this method. To begin with, the nmr spectrometer must be tuned to a specific nucleus, in this case the proton. The actual procedure for obtaining the spectrum varies, but the simplest is referred to as the continuous wave (CW) method. A typical CW-spectrometer is shown in the following diagram. A solution of the sample in a uniform 5 mm glass tube is oriented between the poles of a powerful magnet, and is spun to average any magnetic field variations, as well as tube imperfections. Radio frequency radiation of appropriate energy is broadcast into the sample from an antenna coil (colored red). A receiver coil surrounds the sample tube, and emission of absorbed rf energy is monitored by dedicated electronic devices and a computer. An nmr spectrum is acquired by varying or sweeping the magnetic field over a small range while observing the rf signal from the sample. An equally effective technique is to vary the frequency of the rf radiation while holding the external field constant.

As an example, consider a sample of water in a 2.3487 T external magnetic field, irradiated by 100 MHz radiation. If the magnetic field is smoothly increased to 2.3488 T, the hydrogen nuclei of the water molecules will at some point absorb rf energy and a resonance signal will appear. An animation showing this may be activated by clicking the Show Field Sweep button. The field sweep will be repeated three times, and the resulting resonance trace is colored red. For visibility, the water proton signal displayed in the animation is much broader than it would be in an actual experiment.

Since protons all have the same magnetic moment, we might expect all hydrogen atoms to give resonance signals at the same field / frequency values. Fortunately for chemistry applications, this is not true. By clicking the Show Different Protons button under the diagram, a number of representative proton signals will be displayed over the same magnetic field range. It is not possible, of course, to examine isolated protons in the spectrometer described above; but from independent measurement and calculation it has been determined that a naked proton would resonate at a lower field strength than the nuclei of covalently bonded hydrogens. With the exception of water, chloroform and sulfuric acid, which are examined as liquids, all the other compounds are measured as gases.

Why should the proton nuclei in different compounds behave differently in the nmr experiment ? 
The answer to this question lies with the electron(s) surrounding the proton in covalent compounds and ions. Since electrons are charged particles, they move in response to the external magnetic field (B_o) so as to generate a secondary field that opposes the much stronger applied field. This secondary field shields the nucleus from the applied field, so B_o must be increased in order to achieve resonance (absorption of rf energy). As illustrated in the drawing on the right, B_o must be increased to compensate for the induced shielding field. In the upper diagram, those compounds that give resonance signals at the higher field side of the diagram (CH₄, HCl, HBr and HI) have proton nuclei that are more shielded than those on the lower field (left) side of the diagram. 
The magnetic field range displayed in the above diagram is very small compared with the actual field strength (only about 0.0042%). It is customary to refer to small increments such as this in units of parts per million (ppm). The difference between 2.3487 T and 2.3488 T is therefore about 42 ppm. Instead of designating a range of nmr signals in terms of magnetic field differences (as above), it is more common to use a frequency scale, even though the spectrometer may operate by sweeping the magnetic field. Using this terminology, we would find that at 2.34 T the proton signals shown above extend over a 4,200 Hz range (for a 100 MHz rf frequency, 42 ppm is 4,200 Hz). Most organic compounds exhibit proton resonances that fall within a 12 ppm range (the shaded area), and it is therefore necessary to use very sensitive and precise spectrometers to resolve structurally distinct sets of hydrogen atoms within this narrow range. In this respect it might be noted that the detection of a part-per-million difference is equivalent to detecting a 1 millimeter difference in distances of 1 kilometer.

Chemical Shift

Unlike infrared and uv-visible spectroscopy, where absorption peaks are uniquely located by a frequency or wavelength, the location of different nmr resonance signals is dependent on both the external magnetic field strength and the rf frequency. Since no two magnets will have exactly the same field, resonance frequencies will vary accordingly and an alternative method for characterizing and specifying the location of nmr signals is needed. This problem is illustrated by the eleven different compounds shown in the following diagram. Although the eleven resonance signals are distinct and well separated, an unambiguous numerical locator cannot be directly assigned to each.

One method of solving this problem is to report the location of an nmr signal in a spectrum relative to a reference signal from a standard compound added to the sample. Such a reference standard should be chemically unreactive, and easily removed from the sample after the measurement. Also, it should give a single sharp nmr signal that does not interfere with the resonances normally observed for organic compounds. Tetramethylsilane, (CH₃)₄Si, usually referred to as TMS, meets all these characteristics, and has become the reference compound of choice for proton and carbon nmr.
Since the separation (or dispersion) of nmr signals is magnetic field dependent, one additional step must be taken in order to provide an unambiguous location unit. This is illustrated for the acetone, methylene chloride and benzene signals by clicking on the previous diagram. To correct these frequency differences for their field dependence, we divide them by the spectrometer frequency (100 or 500 MHz in the example), as shown in a new display by again clicking on the diagram. The resulting number would be very small, since we are dividing Hz by MHz, so it is multiplied by a million, as shown by the formula in the blue shaded box. Note that ν_ref is the resonant frequency of the reference signal and ν_samp is the frequency of the sample signal. This operation gives a locator number called the Chemical Shift, having units of parts-per-million (ppm), and designated by the symbol δ   Chemical shifts for all the compounds in the original display will be presented by a third click on the diagram.

The compounds referred to above share two common characteristics:

• The hydrogen atoms in a given molecule are all structurally equivalent, averaged for fast conformational equilibria. 
• The compounds are all liquids, save for neopentane which boils at 9 °C and is a liquid in an ice bath.

The first feature assures that each compound gives a single sharp resonance signal. The second allows the pure (neat) substance to be poured into a sample tube and examined in a nmr spectrometer. In order to take the nmr spectra of a solid, it is usually necessary to dissolve it in a suitable solvent. Early studies used carbon tetrachloride for this purpose, since it has no hydrogen that could introduce an interfering signal. Unfortunately, CCl₄ is a poor solvent for many polar compounds and is also toxic. Deuterium labeled compounds, such as deuterium oxide (D₂O), chloroform-d (DCCl₃), benzene-d₆(C₆D₆), acetone-d₆ (CD₃COCD₃) and DMSO-d₆ (CD₃SOCD₃) are now widely used as nmr solvents. Since the deuterium isotope of hydrogen has a different magnetic moment and spin, it is invisible in a spectrometer tuned to protons.

From the previous discussion and examples we may deduce that one factor contributing to chemical shift differences in proton resonance is the inductive effect. If the electron density about a proton nucleus is relatively high, the induced field due to electron motions will be stronger than if the electron density is relatively low. The shielding effect in such high electron density cases will therefore be larger, and a higher external field (B_o) will be needed for the rf energy to excite the nuclear spin. Since silicon is less electronegative than carbon, the electron density about the methyl hydrogens in tetramethylsilane is expected to be greater than the electron density about the methyl hydrogens in neopentane (2,2-dimethylpropane), and the characteristic resonance signal from the silane derivative does indeed lie at a higher magnetic field. Such nuclei are said to be shielded. Elements that are more electronegative than carbon should exert an opposite effect (reduce the electron density); and, as the data in the following tables show, methyl groups bonded to such elements display lower field signals (they are deshielded). The deshielding effect of electron withdrawing groups is roughly proportional to their electronegativity, as shown by the left table. Furthermore, if more than one such group is present, the deshielding is additive (table on the right), and proton resonance is shifted even further downfield.

The general distribution of proton chemical shifts associated with different functional groups is summarized in the following chart. Bear in mind that these ranges are approximate, and may not encompass all compounds of a given class. Note also that the ranges specified for OH and NH protons (colored orange) are wider than those for most CH protons. This is due to hydrogen bonding variations at different sample concentrations.

Proton Chemical Shift Ranges*
Low Field Region		High Field Region
	* For samples in CDCl3 solution. The δ scale is relative to TMS at δ = 0.

To make use of a calculator that predicts aliphatic proton chemical shifts Click Here. This application was developed at Colby College.

Signal Strength

The magnitude or intensity of nmr resonance signals is displayed along the vertical axis of a spectrum, and is proportional to the molar concentration of the sample. Thus, a small or dilute sample will give a weak signal, and doubling or tripling the sample concentration increases the signal strength proportionally. If we take the nmr spectrum of equal molar amounts of benzene and cyclohexane in carbon tetrachloride solution, the resonance signal from cyclohexane will be twice as intense as that from benzene because cyclohexane has twice as many hydrogens per molecule. This is an important relationship when samples incorporating two or more different sets of hydrogen atoms are examined, since it allows the ratio of hydrogen atoms in each distinct set to be determined. To this end it is necessary to measure the relative strength as well as the chemical shift of the resonance signals that comprise an nmr spectrum. Two common methods of displaying the integrated intensities associated with a spectrum are illustrated by the following examples. In the three spectra in the top row, a horizontal integrator trace (light green) rises as it crosses each signal by a distance proportional to the signal strength. Alternatively, an arbitrary number, selected by the instrument’s computer to reflect the signal strength, is printed below each resonance peak, as shown in the three spectra in the lower row. From the relative intensities shown here, together with the previously noted chemical shift correlations, the reader should be able to assign the signals in these spectra to the set of hydrogens that generates each. If you click on one of the spectrum signals (colored red) or on hydrogen atom(s) in the structural formulas the spectrum will be enlarged and the relationship will be colored blue.
Hint: When evaluating relative signal strengths, it is useful to set the smallest integration to unity and convert the other values proportionally.

Hydroxyl Proton Exchange and the Influence of Hydrogen Bonding

The last two compounds in the lower row are alcohols. The OH proton signal is seen at 2.37 δ in 2-methyl-3-butyne-2-ol, and at 3.87 δ in 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone, illustrating the wide range over which this chemical shift may be found. A six-membered ring intramolecular hydrogen bond in the latter compound is in part responsible for its low field shift, and will be shown by clicking on the hydroxyl proton. We can take advantage of rapid OH exchange with the deuterium of heavy water to assign hydroxyl proton resonance signals . As shown in the following equation, this removes the hydroxyl proton from the sample and its resonance signal in the nmr spectrum disappears. Experimentally, one simply adds a drop of heavy water to a chloroform-d solution of the compound and runs the spectrum again. The result of this exchange is displayed below.

R-O-H   +   D2O      R-O-D   +   D-O-H

Hydrogen bonding shifts the resonance signal of a proton to lower field ( higher frequency ). Numerous experimental observations support this statement, and a few of these will be described here.

i)   The chemical shift of the hydroxyl hydrogen of an alcohol varies with concentration. Very dilute solutions of 2-methyl-2-propanol, (CH3)3COH, in carbon tetrachloride solution display a hydroxyl resonance signal having a relatively high-field chemical shift (< 1.0 δ ). In concentrated solution this signal shifts to a lower field, usually near 2.5 δ.
ii)   The more acidic hydroxyl group of phenol generates a lower-field resonance signal, which shows a similar concentration dependence to that of alcohols. OH resonance signals for different percent concentrations of phenol in chloroform-d are shown in the following diagram (C-H signals are not shown).
iii)   Because of their favored hydrogen-bonded dimeric association, the hydroxyl proton of carboxylic acids displays a resonance signal significantly down-field of other functions. For a typical acid it appears from 10.0 to 13.0 δ and is often broader than other signals. The spectra shown below for chloroacetic acid (left) and 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid (right) are examples.
iv)   Intramolecular hydrogen bonds, especially those defining a six-membered ring, generally display a very low-field proton resonance. The case of 4-hydroxypent-3-ene-2-one (the enol tautomer of 2,4-pentanedione) not only illustrates this characteristic, but also provides an instructive example of the sensitivity of the nmr experiment to dynamic change. In the nmr spectrum of the pure liquid, sharp signals from both the keto and enol tautomers are seen, their mole ratio being 4 : 21 (keto tautomer signals are colored purple). Chemical shift assignments for these signals are shown in the shaded box above the spectrum. The chemical shift of the hydrogen-bonded hydroxyl proton is δ 14.5, exceptionally downfield. We conclude, therefore, that the rate at which these tautomers interconvert is slow compared with the inherent time scale of nmr spectroscopy.
Two structurally equivalent structures may be drawn for the enol tautomer (in magenta brackets). If these enols were slow to interconvert, we would expect to see two methyl resonance signals associated with each, one from the allylic methyl and one from the methyl ketone. Since only one strong methyl signal is observed, we must conclude that the interconversion of the enols is very fast-so fast that the nmr experiment detects only a single time-averaged methyl group (50% α-keto and 50% allyl).

Although hydroxyl protons have been the focus of this discussion, it should be noted that corresponding N-H groups in amines and amides also exhibit hydrogen bonding nmr shifts, although to a lesser degree. Furthermore, OH and NH groups can undergo rapid proton exchange with each other; so if two or more such groups are present in a molecule, the nmr spectrum will show a single signal at an average chemical shift. For example, 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoic acid, (CH₃)₂C(OH)CO₂H, displays a strong methyl signal at δ 1.5 and a 1/3 weaker and broader OH signal at δ 7.3 ppm. Note that the average of the expected carboxylic acid signal (ca. 12 ) and the alcohol signal (ca. 2 ) is 7. Rapid exchange of these hydrogens with heavy water, as noted above, would cause the low field signal to disappear.

π-Electron Functions

An examination of the proton chemical shift chart (above) makes it clear that the inductive effect of substituents cannot account for all the differences in proton signals. In particular the low field resonance of hydrogens bonded to double bond or aromatic ring carbons is puzzling, as is the very low field signal from aldehyde hydrogens. The hydrogen atom of a terminal alkyne, in contrast, appears at a relatively higher field. All these anomalous cases seem to involve hydrogens bonded to pi-electron systems, and an explanation may be found in the way these pi-electrons interact with the applied magnetic field.
Pi-electrons are more polarizable than are sigma-bond electrons, as addition reactions of electrophilic reagents to alkenes testify. Therefore, we should not be surprised to find that field induced pi-electron movement produces strong secondary fields that perturb nearby nuclei. The pi-electrons associated with a benzene ring provide a striking example of this phenomenon, as shown below. The electron cloud above and below the plane of the ring circulates in reaction to the external field so as to generate an opposing field at the center of the ring and a supporting field at the edge of the ring. This kind of spatial variation is called anisotropy, and it is common to nonspherical distributions of electrons, as are found in all the functions mentioned above. Regions in which the induced field supports or adds to the external field are said to be deshielded, because a slightly weaker external field will bring about resonance for nuclei in such areas. However, regions in which the induced field opposes the external field are termed shielded because an increase in the applied field is needed for resonance. Shielded regions are designated by a plus sign, and deshielded regions by a negative sign. 
The anisotropy of some important unsaturated functions will be displayed by clicking on the benzene diagram below. Note that the anisotropy about the triple bond nicely accounts for the relatively high field chemical shift of ethynyl hydrogens. The shielding & deshielding regions about the carbonyl group have been described in two ways, which alternate in the display.

Sigma bonding electrons also have a less pronounced, but observable, anisotropic influence on nearby nuclei. This is seen in the small deshielding shift that occurs in the series CH₃–R, R–CH₂–R, R₃CH; as well as the deshielding of equatorial versus axial protons on a fixed cyclohexane ring.

Solvent Effects

Chloroform-d (CDCl₃) is the most common solvent for nmr measurements, thanks to its good solubilizing character and relative unreactive nature ( except for 1º and 2º-amines). As noted earlier, other deuterium labeled compounds, such as deuterium oxide (D₂O), benzene-d6 (C₆D₆), acetone-d6 (CD₃COCD₃) and DMSO-d6 (CD₃SOCD₃) are also available for use as nmr solvents. Because some of these solvents have π-electron functions and/or may serve as hydrogen bonding partners, the chemical shifts of different groups of protons may change depending on the solvent being used. The following table gives a few examples, obtained with dilute solutions at 300 MHz.

For most of the above resonance signals and solvents the changes are minor, being on the order of ±0.1 ppm. However, two cases result in more extreme changes and these have provided useful applications in structure determination. First, spectra taken in benzene-d₆ generally show small upfield shifts of most C–H signals, but in the case of acetone this shift is about five times larger than normal. Further study has shown that carbonyl groups form weak π–π collision complexes with benzene rings, that persist long enough to exert a significant shielding influence on nearby groups. In the case of substituted cyclohexanones, axial α-methyl groups are shifted upfield by 0.2 to 0.3 ppm; whereas equatorial methyls are slightly deshielded (shift downfield by about 0.05 ppm). These changes are all relative to the corresponding chloroform spectra.
The second noteworthy change is seen in the spectrum of tert-butanol in DMSO, where the hydroxyl proton is shifted 2.5 ppm down-field from where it is found in dilute chloroform solution. This is due to strong hydrogen bonding of the alcohol O–H to the sulfoxide oxygen, which not only de-shields the hydroxyl proton, but secures it from very rapid exchange reactions that prevent the display of spin-spin splitting. Similar but weaker hydrogen bonds are formed to the carbonyl oxygen of acetone and the nitrogen of acetonitrile. A useful application of this phenomenon is described elsewhere in this text.

Spin-Spin Interactions

The nmr spectrum of 1,1-dichloroethane (below right) is more complicated than we might have expected from the previous examples. Unlike its 1,2-dichloro-isomer (below left), which displays a single resonance signal from the four structurally equivalent hydrogens, the two signals from the different hydrogens are split into close groupings of two or more resonances. This is a common feature in the spectra of compounds having different sets of hydrogen atoms bonded to adjacent carbon atoms. The signal splitting in proton spectra is usually small, ranging from fractions of a Hz to as much as 18 Hz, and is designated as J (referred to as the coupling constant). In the 1,1-dichloroethane example all the coupling constants are 6.0 Hz, as illustrated by clicking on the spectrum.

1,2-dichloroethane		1,1-dichloroethane

The splitting patterns found in various spectra are easily recognized, provided the chemical shifts of the different sets of hydrogen that generate the signals differ by two or more ppm. The patterns are symmetrically distributed on both sides of the proton chemical shift, and the central lines are always stronger than the outer lines. The most commonly observed patterns have been given descriptive names, such as doublet (two equal intensity signals), triplet (three signals with an intensity ratio of 1:2:1) and quartet (a set of four signals with intensities of 1:3:3:1). Four such patterns are displayed in the following illustration. The line separation is always constant within a given multiplet, and is called the coupling constant (J). The magnitude of J, usually given in units of Hz, is magnetic field independent.

The splitting patterns shown above display the ideal or “First-Order” arrangement of lines. This is usually observed if the spin-coupled nuclei have very different chemical shifts (i.e. Δν is large compared to J). If the coupled nuclei have similar chemical shifts, the splitting patterns are distorted (second order behavior). In fact, signal splitting disappears if the chemical shifts are the same. Two examples that exhibit minor 2nd order distortion are shown below (both are taken at a frequency of 90 MHz). The ethyl acetate spectrum on the left displays the typical quartet and triplet of a substituted ethyl group. The spectrum of 1,3-dichloropropane on the right demonstrates that equivalent sets of hydrogens may combine their influence on a second, symmetrically located set. 
Even though the chemical shift difference between the A and B protons in the 1,3-dichloroethane spectrum is fairly large (140 Hz) compared with the coupling constant (6.2 Hz), some distortion of the splitting patterns is evident. The line intensities closest to the chemical shift of the coupled partner are enhanced. Thus the B set triplet lines closest to A are increased, and the A quintet lines nearest B are likewise stronger. A smaller distortion of this kind is visible for the A and C couplings in the ethyl acetate spectrum.

What causes this signal splitting, and what useful information can be obtained from it ? 
If an atom under examination is perturbed or influenced by a nearby nuclear spin (or set of spins), the observed nucleus responds to such influences, and its response is manifested in its resonance signal. This spin-coupling is transmitted through the connecting bonds, and it functions in both directions. Thus, when the perturbing nucleus becomes the observed nucleus, it also exhibits signal splitting with the same J. For spin-coupling to be observed, the sets of interacting nuclei must be bonded in relatively close proximity (e.g. vicinal and geminal locations), or be oriented in certain optimal and rigid configurations. Some spectroscopists place a number before the symbol J to designate the number of bonds linking the coupled nuclei (colored orange below). Using this terminology, a vicinal coupling constant is ³J and a geminal constant is ²J.

The following general rules summarize important requirements and characteristics for spin 1/2 nuclei :

1)   Nuclei having the same chemical shift (called isochronous) do not exhibit spin-splitting. They may actually be spin-coupled, but the splitting cannot be observed directly.
2)   Nuclei separated by three or fewer bonds (e.g. vicinal and geminal nuclei ) will usually be spin-coupled and will show mutual spin-splitting of the resonance signals (same J’s), provided they have different chemical shifts. Longer-range coupling may be observed in molecules having rigid configurations of atoms.
3)   The magnitude of the observed spin-splitting depends on many factors and is given by the coupling constant J (units of Hz). J is the same for both partners in a spin-splitting interaction and is independent of the external magnetic field strength.
4)   The splitting pattern of a given nucleus (or set of equivalent nuclei) can be predicted by the n+1 rule, where n is the number of neighboring spin-coupled nuclei with the same (or very similar) Js. If there are 2 neighboring, spin-coupled, nuclei the observed signal is a triplet ( 2+1=3 ); if there are three spin-coupled neighbors the signal is a quartet ( 3+1=4 ). In all cases the central line(s) of the splitting pattern are stronger than those on the periphery. The intensity ratio of these lines is given by the numbers in Pascal’s triangle. Thus a doublet has 1:1 or equal intensities, a triplet has an intensity ratio of 1:2:1, a quartet 1:3:3:1 etc. To see how the numbers in Pascal’s triangle are related to the Fibonacci series click on the diagram.

If a given nucleus is spin-coupled to two or more sets of neighboring nuclei by different J values, the n+1 rule does not predict the entire splitting pattern. Instead, the splitting due to one J set is added to that expected from the other J sets. Bear in mind that there may be fortuitous coincidence of some lines if a smaller J is a factor of a larger J.

<

Spin 1/2 nuclei include ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁹F & ³¹P. The spin-coupling interactions described above may occur between similar or dissimilar nuclei. If, for example, a ¹⁹F is spin-coupled to a ¹H, both nuclei will appear as doublets having the same J constant.  Spin coupling with nuclei having spin other than 1/2 is more complex and will not be discussed here.

To make use of a calculator that predicts first order splitting patterns Click Here. This application was developed at Colby College.

Some Examples

Test your ability to interpret ¹H nmr spectra by analyzing the seven examples presented below. The seven spectra may be examined in turn by clicking the “Toggle Spectra” button. Try to associate each spectrum with a plausible structural formula. 
Although the first four cases are relatively simple, keep in mind that the integration values provide ratios, not absolute numbers. In two cases additional information from infrared spectroscopy is provided. When you have made an assignment you may check your answer by clicking on the spectrum itself. In the sixth example, a similar constitutional isomer cannot be ruled out by the data given.

      3. Carbon NMR Spectroscopy
The power and usefulness of ¹H nmr spectroscopy as a tool for structural analysis should be evident from the past discussion. Unfortunately, when significant portions of a molecule lack C-H bonds, no information is forthcoming. Examples include polychlorinated compounds such as chlordane, polycarbonyl compounds such as croconic acid, and compounds incorporating triple bonds (structures below, orange colored carbons).

Even when numerous C-H groups are present, an unambiguous interpretation of a proton nmr spectrum may not be possible. The following diagram depicts three pairs of isomers (A & B) which display similar proton nmr spectra. Although a careful determination of chemical shifts should permit the first pair of compounds (blue box) to be distinguished, the second and third cases (red & green boxes) might be difficult to identify by proton nmr alone.

These difficulties would be largely resolved if the carbon atoms of a molecule could be probed by nmr in the same fashion as the hydrogen atoms. Since the major isotope of carbon (¹²C) has no spin, this option seems unrealistic. Fortunately, 1.1% of elemental carbon is the ¹³C isotope, which has a spin I = 1/2, so in principle it should be possible to conduct a carbon nmr experiment. It is worth noting here, that if much higher abundances of ¹³C were naturally present in all carbon compounds, proton nmr would become much more complicated due to large one-bond coupling of ¹³C and ¹H.

The most important operational technique that has led to successful and routine ¹³C nmr spectroscopy is the use of high-field pulse technology coupled with broad-band heteronuclear decoupling of all protons. The results of repeated pulse sequences are accumulated to provide improved signal strength. Also, for reasons that go beyond the present treatment, the decoupling irradiation enhances the sensitivity of carbon nuclei bonded to hydrogen. 
When acquired in this manner, the carbon nmr spectrum of a compound displays a single sharp signal for each structurally distinct carbon atom in a molecule (remember, the proton couplings have been removed). The spectrum of camphor, shown on the left below, is typical. Furthermore, a comparison with the ¹H nmr spectrum on the right illustrates some of the advantageous characteristics of carbon nmr. The dispersion of ¹³C chemical shifts is nearly twenty times greater than that for protons, and this together with the lack of signal splitting makes it more likely that every structurally distinct carbon atom will produce a separate signal. The only clearly identifiable signals in the proton spectrum are those from the methyl groups. The remaining protons have resonance signals between 1.0 and 2.8 ppm from TMS, and they overlap badly thanks to spin-spin splitting.

Unlike proton nmr spectroscopy, the relative strength of carbon nmr signals are not normally proportional to the number of atoms generating each one. Because of this, the number of discrete signals and their chemical shifts are the most important pieces of evidence delivered by a carbon spectrum. The general distribution of carbon chemical shifts associated with different functional groups is summarized in the following chart. Bear in mind that these ranges are approximate, and may not encompass all compounds of a given class. Note also that the over 200 ppm range of chemical shifts shown here is much greater than that observed for proton chemical shifts.

13C Chemical Shift Ranges*
Low Field Region		High Field Region
	* For samples in CDCl3 solution. The δ scale is relative to TMS at δ=0.

The isomeric pairs previously cited as giving very similar proton nmr spectra are now seen to be distinguished by carbon nmr. In the example on the left below (blue box), cyclohexane and 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene both give a single sharp resonance signal in the proton nmr spectrum (the former at δ 1.43 ppm and the latter at 1.64 ppm). However, in its carbon nmr spectrum cyclohexane displays a single signal at δ 27.1 ppm, generated by the equivalent ring carbon atoms (colored blue); whereas the isomeric alkene shows two signals, one at δ 20.4 ppm from the methyl carbons (colored brown), and the other at 123.5 ppm (typical of the green colored sp² hybrid carbon atoms).

The C₈H₁₀ isomers in the center (red) box have pairs of homotopic carbons and hydrogens, so symmetry should simplify their nmr spectra. The fulvene (isomer A) has five structurally different groups of carbon atoms (colored brown, magenta, orange, blue and green respectively) and should display five ¹³C nmr signals (one near 20 ppm and the other four greater than 100 ppm). Although ortho-xylene (isomer B) will have a proton nmr very similar to isomer A, it should only display four ¹³C nmr signals, originating from the four different groups of carbon atoms (colored brown, blue, orange and green). The methyl carbon signal will appear at high field (near 20 ppm), and the aromatic ring carbons will all give signals having δ > 100 ppm. Finally, the last isomeric pair, quinones A & B in the green box, are easily distinguished by carbon nmr. Isomer A displays only four carbon nmr signals (δ 15.4, 133.4, 145.8 & 187.9 ppm); whereas, isomer B displays five signals (δ 15.9, 133.3, 145.8, 187.5 & 188.1 ppm), the additional signal coming from the non-identity of the two carbonyl carbon atoms (one colored orange and the other magenta).

Only 15$ for interpretation of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

1. NMRshiftdb

NMRshiftdb2 is a NMR database (web database) for organic structures and their nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr) spectra. It allows for spectrum prediction (¹³C, ¹H and other nuclei) as well as for searching spectra, structures and other properties. The nmrshiftdb2 software is open source, the data is published under an open content license. The core of nmrshitdb2 are fully assigned spectra with raw data and peak lists (we have pure peak lists as well). Those datasets are peer reviewed by a board of reviewers. The project is supported by a scientific advisory board.

nmrshiftdb2 is part of the NFDI4Chem initiative and will provide a component for a curated repository there. Please consult the documentation for more detailed information.

See: https://nmrshiftdb.nmr.uni-koeln.de/portal

2. ACD/NMR

ACD/NMR Workbook Suite is a comprehensive NMR software application with an intuitive interface. It features a full suite of advanced processing, analysis, and databasing functionalities for 1D and 2D NMR data from all major vendor formats. NMR Workbook Suite is built upon cutting-edge algorithms for the most reliable NMR data interpretation. It is designed to streamline routine NMR workflows, simplify structure characterization, and much more.

Powerful NMR Interpretation Software | Highlights

• Import and process 1D and 2D NMR data from all major instrument vendor formats in a single collaborative platform
• Process NMR data manually or automate routine processing workflows—Fourier transformation, calibration, peak picking, integration, multiplet analysis, etc.
• Synchronize peak picking and assignments across datasets within a project
• Confidently verify structures with 3 different verification levels
• Perform targeted analysis of known mixture components and optimize untargeted mixture analysis workflow
• Perform Conformational Analysis using NOESY/ROESY spectra
• Create comprehensive multiplet reports and publication-ready data
• Store, manage, and share live NMR spectra

Synchronize peak picking and assignments across NMR datasets using NMRSync—our game-changing technology. Plus, the associated peaks from NMRSync, NMR prediction, and connectivity-based algorithms are automatically used to only identify the assignments that match all data. This quick and accurate peak picking and assignment workflow helps you to maximize your productivity in the following ways:

• Use any peak in any spectrum to initiate NMRSync
• Integrate a peak in any spectrum and all related peaks in the 1D and 2D NMR spectra of that dataset will be identified and linked in real time
• Automatically resolve overlapping ¹H and ¹³C peaks from 2D NMR data
• Receive immediate color-coded feedback on the best assignment for instant decision-making purposes

NMR Workbook Suite includes three levels of structure verification that evaluate alternative structures to varying degrees for added flexibility in your NMR analysis. This ensures the best structure that matches the experimental NMR data is confirmed with much less time and effort than manual interpretation.

• Determine how well your proposed structure matches the datasets in your NMR project with single structure verification
• Generate a specified number of alternative structures, based on the user-defined proposed structure, and evaluate whether they are a better match to the NMR dataset using Combined and Concurrent Verification
• Generate and view every alternative structural and cis/trans isomer that matches the experimental data in real-time using Unbiased Verification for an absolute level of confidence. This workflow eliminates the user bias and ensures the assigned structure is indeed the best structure that fits the experimental data.

See: https://www.acdlabs.com/products/spectrus/workbooks/nmr/

3. See: http://www.cheminfo.org/Spectra/NMR/Predictions/1H_Prediction/index.html

4. See: https://www.nmrprocflow.org/

5. See: https://chem.washington.edu/facilities/data-processing

6. See: https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky/

7. See: http://www.nmrdb.org/about/

Only 15$ for interpretation of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) interpretation plays a pivotal role in molecular identifications. As interpreting NMR spectra, the structure of an unknown compound, as well as known structures, can be assigned by several factors such as chemical shift, spin multiplicity, coupling constants, and integration. This Module focuses on the most important ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra to find out structure even though there are various kinds of NMR spectra such as ¹⁴N, ¹⁹F, and ³¹P. NMR spectrum shows that x- axis is chemical shift in ppm. It also contains integral areas, splitting pattern, and coupling constant.

Strategy for Solving Structure

Here is the general strategy for solving structure with NMR:

1. Molecular formula is determined by chemical analysis such as elementary analysis
2. Double-bond equivalent (also known as Degree of Unsaturation) is calculated by a simple equation to estimate the number of the multiple bonds and rings. It assumes that oxygen (O) and sulfur (S) are ignored and halogen (Cl, Br) and nitrogen is replaced by CH. The resulting empirical formula is C_aH_b

3. Structure fragmentation is determined by chemical shift, spin multiplicity, integral (peak area), and coupling constants (1J1J, 2J2J)
4. Molecular skeleton is built up using 2-dimensional NMR spectroscopy.
5. Relative configuration is predicted by coupling constant (³J).

¹H NMR

Chemical Shift

Chemical shift is associated with the Larmor frequency of a nuclear spin to its chemical environment. Tetramethylsilane (TMS, (CH3)4Si(CH3)4Si) is generally used as an internal standard to determine chemical shift of compounds: δ_TMS=0 ppm. In other words, frequencies for chemicals are measured for a ¹H or ¹³C nucleus of a sample from the ¹H or ¹³C resonance of TMS. It is important to understand trend of chemical shift in terms of NMR interpretation. The proton NMR chemical shift is affect by nearness to electronegative atoms (O, N, halogen.) and unsaturated groups (C=C,C=O, aromatic). Electronegative groups move to the down field (left; increase in ppm). Unsaturated groups shift to downfield (left) when affecting nucleus is in the plane of the unsaturation, but reverse shift takes place in the regions above and below this plane. ¹H chemical shift play a role in identifying many functional groups. Figure 11. indicates important example to figure out the functional groups.

Chemical equivalence

Protons with Chemical equivalence has the same chemical shift due to symmetry within molecule (CH3COCH3CH3COCH3) or fast rotation around single bond (-CH₃; methyl groups).

Spin-Spin Splitting

Spin-Spin splitting means that an absorbing peak is split by more than one “neighbor” proton. Splitting signals are separated to J Hz, where is called the coupling constant. The spitting is a very essential part to obtain exact information about the number of the neighboring protons. The maximum of distance for splitting is three bonds. Chemical equivalent protons do not result in spin-spin splitting. When a proton splits, the proton’s chemical shift is determined in the center of the splitting lines.

Spin Multiplicity (Splitting pattern)

Spin Multiplicity plays a role in determining the number of neighboring protons. Here is a multiplicity rules: In case of AmBnAmBn system, the multiplicity rule is that Nuclei of BB element produce a splitting the AA signal into nB+1nB+1 lines. The general formula which applies to all nuclei is 2nI+12nI+1, where II is the spin quantum number of the coupled element. The relative intensities of the each lines are given by the coefficients of the Pascal’s triangle (Figure 22).

First-order splitting pattern

The chemical shift difference in Hertz between coupled protons in Hertz is much larger than the JJ coupling constant:ΔνJ≥8(1)(1)ΔνJ≥8

Where ΔνΔν is the difference of chemical shift. In other word, the proton is only coupled to other protons that are far away in chemical shift. The spectrum is called first-order spectrum. The splitting pattern depends on the magnetic field. The second-order splitting at the lower field can be resolved into first-order splitting pattern at the high field. The first-order splitting pattern is allowed to multiplicity rule (N+1) and Pascal’s triangle to determine splitting pattern and intensity distribution.

Example 11

The note is that structure system is A₃M₂X₂. H_a and H_x has the triplet pattern by Hm because of N+1 rule. The signal of Hm is split into six peaks by H_x and H_a(Figure3) The First order pattern easily is predicted due to separation with equal splitting pattern.

High-order splitting pattern

High-order splitting pattern takes place when chemical shift difference in Hertz is much less or the same that order of magnitude as the j coupling.ΔvJ≤10(2)(2)ΔvJ≤10

The second order pattern is observed as leaning of a classical pattern: the inner peaks are taller and the outer peaks are shorter in case of AB system (Figure 44). This is called the roof effect.

Here is other system as an example: A₂B₂ (Figure 55). The two triplet incline toward each other. Outer lines of the triplet are less than 1 in relative area and the inner lines are more than 1. The center lines have relative area 2.

Coupling constant (J Value)

Coupling constant is the strength of the spin-spin splitting interaction and the distance between the split lines. The value of distance is equal or different depending on the coupled nuclei. The coupling constants reflect the bonding environments of the coupled nuclei. Coupling constant is classified by the number of bonds:

Geminal proton-proton coupling (²J_HH)

Germinal coupling generates through two bonds (Figure 66). Two proton having geminal coupling are not chemically equivalent. This coupling ranges from -20 to 40 Hz. ²J_HHdepends on hybridization of carbon atom and the bond angle and the substituent such as electronegative atoms. When S-character is increased, Geminal coupling constant is increased: ²J_sp1>²J_sp2>²J_sp3 The bond angle(HCH) gives rise to change ²J_HH value and depend on the strain of the ring in the cyclic systems. Geminal coupling constant determines ring size. When bond angle is decreased, ring size is decreased so that geminal coupling constant is more positive. If a atom is replace to an electronegative atom, Geminal coupling constant move to positive value.

Vicinal proton-proton coupling (³J_HH)

Vicinal coupling occurs though three bonds (Figure 77.). The Vicinal coupling is the most useful information of dihedral angle, leading to stereochemistry and conformation of molecules. Vicinal coupling constant always has the positive value and is affected by the dihedral angle (?;HCCH), the valence angle (?; HCC), the bond length of carbon-carbon, and the effects of electronegative atoms. Vicinal coupling constant depending on the dihedral angle (Figure 88) is given by the Karplus equation.3J=7.0−0.5cosϕ+4.5cos2ϕ(3)(3)3J=7.0−0.5cos⁡ϕ+4.5cos2⁡ϕ

When ? is the 90^o, vicinal coupling constant is zero. In addition, vicinal coupling constant ranges from 8 to 10 Hz at the and ?=180^o, where ?=0^o and ?=180^o means that the coupled protons have cis and trans configuration, respectively.

The valence angle(?;Figure 88) also causes change of ³J_HH value. Valence angle is related with ring size. Typically, when the valence angle decreases, the coupling constant reduces. The distance between the carbons atoms gives influences to vicinal coupling constant

The coupling constant increases with the decrease of bond length. Electronegative atoms affect vicinal coupling constants so that electronegative atoms decrease the vicinal coupling constants.

Integral

Integral is referred to integrated peak area of 1H signals. The intensity is directly proportionally to the number of hydrogen.

¹³C NMR

Chemical Shift

Spin-Spin splitting

Comparing the ¹H NMR, there is a big difference thing in the ¹³C NMR. The ¹³C- ¹³ C spin-spin splitting rarely exit between adjacent carbons because ¹³C is naturally lower abundant (1.1%)

• ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling: ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling provides useful information about the number of protons attached a carbon atom. In case of one bond coupling (¹J_CH), -CH, -CH₂, and CH₃ have respectively doublet, triplet, quartets for the ¹³C resonances in the spectrum. However, ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling has an disadvantage for ¹³C spectrum interpretation. ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling is hard to analyze and reveal structure due to a forest of overlapping peaks that result from 100% abundance of ¹H.
• Decoupling: Decoupling is the process of removing ¹³C-¹H coupling interaction to simplify a spectrum and identify which pair of nuclei is involved in the J coupling. The decoupling ¹³C spectra shows only one peak(singlet) for each unique carbon in the molecule(Figure 1010.). Decoupling is performed by irradiating at the frequency of one proton with continuous low-power RF.

• Distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT): DEPT is used for distinguishing between a CH₃ group, a CH₂ group, and a CH group. The proton pulse is set at 45^o, 90^o, or 135^o in the three separate experiments. The different pulses depend on the number of protons attached to a carbon atom. Figure 1111. is an example about DEPT spectrum.

2-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (COSY)

COSY stands for COrrelation SpectroscopY. COSY spectrum is more useful information about what is being correlated.

¹H-¹H COSY (COrrelation SpectroscopY)

¹H-¹H COSY is used for clearly indicate correlation with coupled protons. A point of entry into a COSY spectrum is one of the keys to predict information from it successfully. Relation of Coupling protons is determined by cross peaks(correlation peaks) and in the COSY spectrum. In other words, Diagonal peaks by lines ar e coupled to each other. Figure 1212 indicates that there are correlation peaks between proton H₁ and H₂ as well as between H₂ and H₄. This means the H₂ coupled to H₁ and H₄.

¹H-¹³C COSY (HETCOR)

¹H-¹³C COSY is the heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. The HETCOR spectrum is correlated ¹³C nuclei with directly attached protons. ¹H-¹³C coupling is one bond. The cross peaks mean correlation between a proton and a carbon (Figure 1313). If a line does not have cross peak, this means that this carbon atoms has no attached proton (e.g. a quaternary carbon atom)

References

1. Balc*, M., Basic p1 sH- and p13 sC-NMR spectroscopy. 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam ; Boston, 2005; p xii, 427.
2. Breitmaier, E., Structure elucidation by NMR in organic chemistry : a practical guide. 3rd rev. ed.; Wiley: Chichester, West Sussex, England, 2002; p xii, 258.
3. Jacobsen, N. E., NMR spectroscopy explained : simplified theory, applications and examples for organic chemistry and structural biology. Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, N.J., 2007; p xv, 668.
4. Silverstein, R. M.; Webster, F. X., Spectrometric identification of organic compounds. 6th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1998; p xiv, 482.

Outside Links

• NMRShiftDB: a Free web database for NMR data : nmrshiftdb.chemie.uni-mainz.de/nmrshiftdb
• NMR database from ACD/LAbs : www.acdlabs.com/products/spec_lab/exp_spectra/spec_libraries/aldrich.html
• NMR database from John Crerar Library : http://crerar.typepad.com/crerar_lib…h_ir_nmr_.html

Problems

Draw the 1H NMR spectrum for 2-Hydroxypropane in CDCl3. Assume sufficient resolution to provide a first-order spectrum and ignore vicinal proton-proton coupling(3JHH)

Solution

1) the structure of 2-hydoroxyporpane is drawn

Figure out which protons are chemically equivalent, i.e., two methyl (-CH₃) groups are chemical equivalent.

4) Splitting pattern is determined by (N+1) rule: Ha is split into two peaks by H_b(#of proton=1). H_b has the septet pattern by H_a (#of proton=6). H_c has one peak.(Note that H_c has doublet pattern by H_b due to vicinal proton-proton coupling.)

Only 15$ for interpretation of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

This handout relates the basic theory of NMR described on the theory web handout with spectra of real molecules and how to deduce structure from the spectra. Before reading this handout, you need to be thoroughly familiar with all of theory concepts that were described.

1.0 The NMR spectrum.

1.1 Because different amounts of electron density are around different non-eqivalent nuclei, the different non-equivalent nuclei in a molecule are experiencing slightly different net magnetic fields in an NMR experiment (Review Section 5.2A of the theory handout). Recall also that the difference in energy between the two allowed spin states (+1/2 and -1/2 spin states) of a spin 1/2 nucleus (like in 1H and 13C nuclei) depends on the exact magnetic field felt by the nucleus (Review Section 2.3Cin the theory handout). Recall further that in the NMR experiment, when and only when nuclei are irradiated with electromagnetic radiation of energy that exactlycorresponds to the energy difference between the +1/2 and -1/2 spin states, the nuclei absorb the energy and the NMR spectrometer measures this absorbance (Review section 3.1 of the theory handout). The absorbance of energy to convert a nucleus from a +1/2 to a -1/2 spin state is referred to as “resonance” of that nucleus.1.1A The key conclusion is that nuclei with different electron densities have +1/2 and -1/2 spin states that differ in energy by differing amounts, so these nuclei will absorb electromagnetic radiation of different frequencies in the NMR experiment.

1.1B Nuclei surrounded by greater amounts of electron density will be more shielded from the external magnetic field, so they will absorb electromagnetic radiation of lower energy, that is, lower frequency (energy is proportional to frequency). You may want to review Section 5.2A of the theory handout again.

1.1C The converse is also true, namely that nuclei surrounded by lesser amounts of electron density will be less shielded (referred to as being “deshielded”) from the external magnetic field, so they will absorb electromagnetic radiation of higher energy, that is, higher frequency(energy is proportional to frequency).

1.1D The three most important factors influencing the electron density around a hydrogen nucleus are: (i) adjacent electronegative atoms remove electron density; (ii) hybridization of the attached carbon atom, increasing shielding is observed in the order sp2, sp, sp3; (iii) adjacent pi bonds are deshielding, which relates to (ii).1.2 An NMR spectrum is a plot of absorbance versus frequency.

1.2A To make different spectra directly comparable, a standard is used for all NMR spectra. For 1H NMR spectra, the standard is called tetramethylsilane (TMS) and a small amount of TMS is usually added to any 1H NMR sample.

1.2B Magnets of different strengths lead to absorbance of electromagnetic radiation at different frequencies for the same nucleus, meaning that if simple frequency were plotted in an NMR spectra, you could not compare spectra taken of the same sample on machines with different magnet strengths. To solve this problem, the frequency of absorption plotted on NMR spectra are corrected for the magnet strength. In addition, frequency is correlated to the reference compound TMS. The frequency at which TMS absorbs is defined as 0 frequency by convention. In the NMR spectrum, absorbance frequencies of electromagnetic radiation are plotted as chemical shift (d) listed in units called parts per million (ppm) that is defined by the following equation:

1.3 The bottom line to this entire section is that the hydrogen atoms of different functional groups (methyl groups, -CH2- groups, aldehyde -C(O)H, alkene C-H, etc.) have characteristic chemical shifts, i.e. absorbance frequencies. These characteristic chemical shifts are collected in tables such as Fgure 13.8 and Appendix 4 of your book. From the chemical shift information, you thus know what functional groups are present in a molecule.

1.4 Chemically equivalent hydrogen atoms will have the same chemical shift and therefore give rise to the same signal. This is why we defined equivalent atoms in Section6.1 of the theory handout. Non-equivalent groups of hydrogens will have different chemical shifts. Thus, you will have as many different signals in an NMR spectrum as there are chemically non-equivalent groups of hydrogen atoms.

2.0 The nuclear spin of hydrogen atoms creates a magnetic field that influences the chemical shift of nearby hydrogen atoms (Review Sections 5.1 and 5.2).

2.1 Nuclear spin magnetic fields will influence hydrogen atoms that are three or fewer bonds away from each other in the same molecule. Hydrogen atoms that are four or greater bonds away usually do not influence each other.

2.2 A hydrogen atom with a nuclecus in a spin state of +1/2 produces a slightly different magnetic field than a one in a –1/2 spin state.

2.3 Even in a strong magnetic field, across a population of molecules, there is only a very slight excess of nuclei in the +1/2 spin state.

2.4 Putting all of these ideas together means the following: Consider a hydrogen X adjacent (three bonds away) to another hydrogen Y in a molecule. In around half of the molecules in the NMR sample, hydrogen X feels the magnetic field from a Y with nuclear spin of +1/2. The other half feel from Y a nuclear spin of –1/2. Thus, when you look at the spectrum, there are actually two different, but closely spaced peaks as the signal for hydrogen X. This phenomenon is called “spin-spin” splitting, and the distance between the two signals for X is called the “coupling constant”, often denoted as “J”. Similarly, the signal for Y actually has two peaks because of spin-spin splitting by X.

2.5 Consider a –CH2- group adjacent to a hydrogen X. Both of the hydrogen atoms in the –CH2- are chemically equivalent and could be either in the +1/2 or –1/2 nuclear spin state. Thus, there are three situations possible: i) +1/2,+1/2; ii) +1/2,-1/2, which is the same as –1/2, +1/2 and iii) –1/2,-1/2. Thus, there are actually three different magnetic fields that are felt by X in molecules of the sample, in a 1:2:1 ratio. Thus, the signal for hydrogen X is split into three peaks in a 1:2:1 ratio.

2.6 The same holds for a –CH3 group, that will split an adjacent hydrogen signal into four peaks, with a 1:3:3:1 ratio. You should verify this for yourself by making all the possible combinations of nuclear spins for the three equivalent hydrogen atoms of a methyl group.

2.7 In the general case, N equivalent hydrogen atoms will split an adjacent signal into (N+1) peaks, with relative ratios that are predicted by Pascal’s triangle (Figure 13.16 in the book).

3.0 Following the same logic, the splitting should multiply if a single hydrogen atom is adjacent to hydrogen atoms on either side. Think about combining all the possible nuclear spin states for these nearby sets of hydrogen atoms. Thus, if you have a hydrogen atom X between one –CH2- and one –CH3 group, it should be split into an amazing (2+1) x (3 + 1) = 12 signals because there are that many different combinations of +1/2 and -1/2 spins possible.

3.1 Thus, if the coupling constants (J) from the –CH2- and –CH3 groups are significantly different from each other, then 12 peaks will be observed as the signal for hydrogen X.

3.2 However, in practice, coupling constants (J) are pretty close to the same value for almost all sets of hydrogen atoms in organic molecules, simplifying the splitting pattern, since now many of the twelve peaks will overlap with each other. What this means is that for almost all the spectra you will see, if a hydrogen X is surrounded by N hydrogen atoms, the signal for X will be split into only (N+1) peaks, no matter how those N hydrogen atoms are grouped in terms of sets of equivalent atoms. Thus, what is actually seen for the example above is that the signal for X would appear in the spectrum to be split into 2 + 3 + 1 = 6 peaks, not 12, peaks. This is the so-called “N+1” rule.

3.3 The diagram below shows these two different situations. When nuclei from hydrogen atoms Z and Y split the signal for hydrogen X with very different coupling constants (notice how the coupling constant J for the red Z hydrogen nuclei is larger than J for the blue Y hydrogen nuclei), all twelve peaks are spread out and identifiable. Below that is shown the situation in which the coupling constants are the same for nuclei of both Z and Y, so only 6 peaks are actually observed in the signal for hydrogen X due to extensive overlap. This latter case, with six peaks, is what you will almost always see in reality since coupling constants tend to be similar in organic molecules.

3.3 The above explanation of splitting can confuse students for a while. The important point is that in the example given, you see 6 different peaks in the spectrum (N+1 rule) even though there are really 12 peaks produced, it is just that several of them are on top of each other because the coupling constants are the same. For alkyl groups in organic molecules, the coupling constants are generally the same so you will almost always see the fewer peaks, corresponding to the simple N+1 rule, rather than the greater number of peaks derived from the multiplication rule.

3.4 The bottom line here is that by seeing how a given signal is split, you can figure out how many hydrogen atoms are adjacent on the molecule, namely the number of peaks in the signal minus 1. From this information you can piece together what a molecule looks like if you know how many atoms of each type are present (i.e. the molecular formula such as C4H10N2O). You get the molecular formula information from something called a mass spectrum, described later in the text. Molecular formulas will be provided to you in homework or test questions.

4.0 For a given signal, integrating the signal (include all splitting peaks for a given signal) gives you a relative value that is proportional to the number of equivalent hydrogen atoms that gave rise to the signal. Thus, by looking at the integration values, you can deduce how many of each type of equivalent hydrogen atoms are in the molecule. For example, a -CH3 group would have a signal that integrates to a relative value of 3 (no matter how the signal is split), and a -CH2- group would have a relative integration of 2, etc. Note that sometimes integrations are simply given as absolute numbers, and you must find the common factor to deduce how many hydrogen atoms are represented by each integration value.

5.0 Putting it all together: How to deduce a structure from an NMR spectrum. First, you must be given the molecular formula, so you know how many of each type of atom are present. Second, count the number of different signals and their relative integrations to see how many different sets of equivalent hydrogen atoms are in a molecule, and how many of each set are present. Compare the chemical shifts of each signal to tables to identify what functional groups are present. Finally, use the signal splittings to determine which hydrogen atoms must be no more than 3 bonds away from each other.

6.0 For alkenes, the pi bond prevents bond rotation so the different hydrogen atoms on an unsymmetrical alkene are not equivalent, so they all have different signals, and splitting follows the multiplicative rule (the coupling constants are usually significantly different for geminal vs. cis. vs. trans relationships).

7.0 For hydrogens in a -CH2- group adjacent to a chiral center, the two different H atoms are no longer equivalent, because even with bond rotation, the two hydrogens are never in the same environment with respect to the groups on the adjacent chiral center. Thus, each H of -CH2- group adjacent to a chiral center usually has its own signal in the NMR spectrum.

8.0 There is a great deal more to NMR than this, I am only trying to give you the basics here.

Only 8$ for interpretation of your EDS spectrum 
and 10$ for interpretation of your SEM/TEM micrograghs
Payment Upon Completion

Send your results...

What is EDS?

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (also known as EDS, EDX, or EDXA) is a powerful technique that enables the user to analyze the elemental composition of a desired sample. The major operating principle that allows EDS to function is the capacity of high energy electromagnetic radiation (X-rays) to eject ‘core’ electrons (electrons that are not in the outermost shell) from an atom. This principle is known as Moseley’s Law, which determined that there was a direct correlation between the frequency of light released and the atomic number of the atom.

Removing these electrons from the system will leave behind a hole that a higher energy electron can fill in, and it will release energy as it relaxes. The energy released during this relaxation process is unique to each element on the periodic table, and as such bombarding a sample with X-rays can be used to identify what elements are present, as well as what proportion they are present in.

Shown below is an example of how EDS works. The letters K, L, and M refer to the n value that electrons in that shell have (K electrons, closest to the nucleus, are n=1 electrons), while α and β indicate the size of the transition. The relaxation from M to L or L to K are therefore described as Lα or Kα, while going from M to K would be a Kβ transition. The means that are used for describing these processes as a whole are known as Siegbahn notation.

How is data collected?

EDS functions with a series of three major parts: an emitter, a collector, and an analyzer. These parts are additionally typically equipped on an electron microscope such as SEM or TEM. The combination of these three pieces enables analysis of both how many X-rays are released, as well as what their energy is (in comparison to the energy of the initial X-rays that were emitted).

The EDS data is presented as a graph with KeV on the x-axis and peak intensity on the y-axis. The peak location on the x-axis are converted into the atoms that the energy changes represent by a computer program.

Figure. EDS chart from a research group that was analyzing the composition of shrimp and the associated bacteria that associate with these minerals. The EDS helped support the researcher’s case that the endosymbiotic bacteria living on these shrimp actually do influence the iron oxide composition in these minerals. This is evident by the peaks at 0.5 and 6.5 KeV.² 

What are some drawbacks of EDS?

Although EDS is an extremely useful technique, there are a number of difficulties involved with the process which hinder its utility. First, EDS is generally not a particularly sensitive technique. If the concentration of an element in the sample is too low, the amount of energy given off by X-rays after hitting the sample will be insufficient to adequately measure its proportion. Second, EDS generally does not work for elements with a low atomic number. Hydrogen and helium both only have an n=1 shell, meaning there aren’t core electrons to be removed that can allow for X-ray emission. Lithium and beryllium, meanwhile, have sufficiently low atomic numbers that the energy of X-rays given off by Li or Be samples is insufficient for measurement, and often times they cannot be tested as a result.

One additional difficulty associated with the technique is the thickness of the sample. Sample thickness can bring energy levels closer together, thus making electrons easier to move to outer energy levels, which can in turn cause deviation in the results. Another error source is overlapping emitted x-rays, which can alter the KeV readings. Additionally, X-rays are not particularly effective at penetrating beyond several nanometers in samples, which means that only surface layers can be efficiently measured by the technique. As such, if there is a discrepancy between the outer and inner material layers, it will not necessarily appear in EDS.

Work Cited

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy-dispersive_X-ray_spectroscopy
2. https://cfamm.ucr.edu/documents/eds-intro.pdf
3. L. Corbari, M.-A. Cambon-Bonavita, G. J. Long, F. Grandjean, M. Zbinden, F. Gaill, and P. Compere “Iron oxide deposits associated with the ectosymbiotic bacteria in the hydrothermal vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata” Biogeosciences 2008, 5, 1295–1310.