Only 8$ for interpretation of your zeta potential results
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Introduction

The physical properties of colloids (nanoparticles) and suspensions are strongly dependent on the nature and extent of the particle-liquid interface. The behavior of aqueous dispersions between particles and liquid is especially sensitive to the ionic and electrical structure of the interface.

Zeta potential is a parameter that measures the electrochemical equilibrium at the particle-liquid interface. It measures the magnitude of electrostatic repulsion/attraction between particles and thus, it has become one of the fundamental parameters known to affect stability of colloidal particles. It should be noted that that term stability, when applied to colloidal dispersions, generally means the resistance to change of the dispersion with time. Figure 2.5.12.5.1 illustrates the basic concept of zeta potential.

From the fundamental theory’s perspective, zeta potential is the electrical potential in the interfacial double layer (DL) at the location of the slipping plane (shown in Figure 2.5.12.5.1 ). We can regard zeta potential as the potential difference between the dispersion medium and the stationary layer of the fluid attached to the particle layer. Therefore, in experimental concerns, zeta potential is key factor in processes such as the preparation of colloidal dispersions, utilization of colloidal phenomena and the destruction of unwanted colloidal dispersions. Moreover, zeta potential analysis and measurements nowadays have a lot of real-world applications. In the field of biomedical research, zeta potential measurement, in contrast to chemical methods of analysis which can disrupt the organism, has the particular merit of providing information referring to the outermost regions of an organism. It is also largely utilized in water purification and treatment. Zeta potential analysis has established optimum coagulation conditions for removal of particulate matter and organic dyestuffs from aqueous waste products.

Brief History and Development of Zeta Potential

Zeta potential is a scientific term for electrokinetic potential in colloidal dispersions. In prior literature, it is usually denoted using the Greek letter zeta, Ζ, hence it has obtained the name zeta potential as Ζ-potential. The earliest theory for calculating Zeta potential from experimental data was developed by Marian Smoluchowski in 1903 (Figure 2.5.22.5.2 ). Even till today, this theory is still the most well-known and widely used method for calculating zeta potential.

Interestingly, this theory was originally developed for electrophoresis. Later on, people started to apply his theory in calculation of zeta potential. The main reason that this theory is powerful is because of its universality and validity for dispersed particles of any shape and any concentration. However, there still some limitations to this early theory as it was mainly determined experimentally. The main limitations are that Smoluchowski’s theory neglects the contribution of surface conductivity and only works for particles which have sizes much larger than the interface layer, denoted as κ_a (1/κ is called Debye length and a is the particle radius).

Overbeek and Booth as early pioneers in this direction started to develop more theoretical and rigorous electrokinetic theories that were able to incorporate surface conductivity for electrokinetic applications. Modern rigorous electrokinetic theories that are valid almost any κa mostly are generated from Ukrainian (Dukhin) and Australian (O’Brien) scientists.

Principle of Zeta Potential Analysis

Electrokinetic Phenomena

Because an electric double-layer (EDL) exists between a surface and solution, then any relative motion between the rigid and mobile parts of the EDL will result in the generation of an electrokinetic potential. As described above, zeta potential is essentially a electrokinetic potential which rises from electrokinetic phenomena. So it is important to understand different situations where electrokinetic potential can be produced. There are generally four fundamental ways which zeta potential can be produced, via electrophoresis, electro-osmosis, streaming potential, and sedimentation potential as shown from Figure 2.5.32.5.3 .

Calculations of Zeta Potential

There are many different ways of calculating zeta potential . In this section, the methods of calculating zeta potential in electrophoresis and electroosmosis will be introduced.

Zeta Potential in Electrophoresis

Electrophoresis is the movement of charged colloidal particles or polyelectrolytes, immersed in a liquid, under the influence of an external electric field. In such case, the electrophoretic velocity, v_e (ms^-1) is the velocity during electrophoresis and the electrophoretic mobility, u­­_e (m ² V ^-1 s ^-1 ) is the magnitude of the velocity divided by the magnitude of the electric field strength. The mobility is counted positive if the particles move toward lower potential and negative in the opposite case. And therefore, we have the relationship v_e­= u_eE, where E is the externally applied field.

Thus, the formula accounted for zeta potential in electrophoresis case is given in EQ, where ε_rs is the relative permittivity of the electrolyte solution, ε₀ is the electric permittivity of vacuum and η is the viscosity.ue =εrsε0ζη(2.5.1)(2.5.1)ue =εrsε0ζηve =εrsε0ζηE(2.5.2)(2.5.2)ve =εrsε0ζηE

There are two cases regarding the size of κa:

1. κa < 1: the formula is similar, 2.5.32.5.3 .
2. κa > 1: the formula is rather complicated and we need to solve equation for zeta potential, 2.5.42.5.4 , where yeζ= eζ/kTyeζ= eζ/kT , m is about 0.15 for aqueous solution.

ue=23εrsε0ζη(2.5.3)(2.5.3)ue=23εrsε0ζη32ηeεrsε0kTue=32yek−6[yek2−ln 2ζ{1−e−ζyek}]2+ka1+3m/ζ2e−ζyek2(2.5.4)(2.5.4)32ηeεrsε0kTue=32yek−6[yek2−ln 2ζ{1−e−ζyek}]2+ka1+3m/ζ2e−ζyek2

Zeta Potential in Electroosmosis

Electroosmosis is the motion of a liquid through an immobilized set of particles, a porous plug, a capillary, or a membrane, in response to an applied electric field. Similar to electrophoresis, it has the electroosmotic velocity, v_eo (ms ^-1 ) as the uniform velocity of the liquid far from the charged interface. Usually, the measured quantity is the volume flow rate of liquid divided by electric field strength, Q_eo,E (m ⁴ V ^-1 s ^-1 ) or diveided by the electric current, Q_eo,I (m ³ C ^-1 ). Therefore, the relationship is given by 2.5.52.5.5 .Qeo= ∫∫veodS(2.5.5)(2.5.5)Qeo= ∫∫veodS

Thus the formula accounted for Zeta potential in electroosmosis is given in EQ.

As with electrophoresis there are two cases regarding the size of κa:

• κa >>1 and there is no surface conduction, where Ac is the cross-section area and KL is the bulk conductivity of particle.
• κa < 1, 2.5.82.5.8 , where Δu =KσKLΔu =KσKL is the Dukhin number account for surface conductivity, KσKσ is the surface conductivity of the particle.

Qeo,E=−εrsε0ζηAc(2.5.6)(2.5.6)Qeo,E=−εrsε0ζηAcQeo,I=−εrsε0ζη1KL(2.5.7)(2.5.7)Qeo,I=−εrsε0ζη1KLQeo,I=−εrsε0ζη1KL(1+2Δu)(2.5.8)(2.5.8)Qeo,I=−εrsε0ζη1KL(1+2Δu)

Relationship Between Zeta Potential and Particle Stability in Electrophoresis

Using the above theoretical methods, we can calculate zeta potential for particles in electrophoresis. The following table summarizes the stability behavior of the colloid particles with respect to zeta potential. Thus, we can use zeta potential to predict the stability of colloidal particles in the electrokinetic phenomena of electrophoresis.

Instrumentation

In this section, a market-available zeta potential analyzer will be used as an example of how experimentally zeta potential is analyzed. Figure 2.5.42.5.4 shows an example of a typical zeta potential analyzer for electrophoresis.

The inside measuring principle is described in the following diagram, which shows the detailed mechanism of zeta potential analyzer (Figure 2.5.52.5.5 ).

When a voltage is applied to the solution in which particles are dispersed, particles are attracted to the electrode of the opposite polarity, accompanied by the fixed layer and part of the diffuse double layer, or internal side of the “sliding surface”. Using the following formula below of this specific Analyzer and the computer program, we can obtain the zeta potential for electrophoresis using this typical zeta potential analyzer (Figure 2.5.62.5.6 .

Only 8$ for interpretation of your DLS results
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Dynamic light scattering (DLS), which is also known as photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) or quasi-elastic light scattering (QLS), is a spectroscopy method used in the fields of chemistry, biochemistry, and physics to determine the size distribution of particles (polymers, proteins, colloids, etc.) in solution or suspension. In the DLS experiment, normally a laser provides the monochromatic incident light, which impinges onto a solution with small particles in Brownian motion.

And then through the Rayleigh scattering process, particles whose sizes are sufficiently small compared to the wavelength of the incident light will diffract the incident light in all direction with different wavelengths and intensities as a function of time. Since the scattering pattern of the light is highly correlated to the size distribution of the analyzed particles, the size-related information of the sample could be then acquired by mathematically processing the spectral characteristics of the scattered light.

Herein a brief introduction of basic theories of DLS will be demonstrated, followed by descriptions and guidance on the instrument itself and the sample preparation and measurement process. Finally, data analysis of the DLS measurement, and the applications of DLS as well as the comparison against other size-determine techniques will be shown and summarized.

DLS Theory

The theory of DLS can be introduced utilizing a model system of spherical particles in solution. According to the Rayleigh scattering (Figure 2.4.12.4.1), when a sample of particles with diameter smaller than the wavelength of the incident light, each particle will diffract the incident light in all directions, while the intensity II is determined by 2.4.12.4.1 , where I0I0 and λλ is the intensity and wavelength of the unpolarized incident light, RR is the distance to the particle, θθ is the scattering angel, nnis the refractive index of the particle, and rr is the radius of the particle.

I = I01 +cos2θ2R2(2πλ)4(n2 − 1n2 + 2)2r6(2.4.1)(2.4.1)I = I01 +cos2⁡θ2R2(2πλ)4(n2 − 1n2 + 2)2r6

If that diffracted light is projected as an image onto a screen, it will generate a “speckle” pattern (Figure 2.4.22.4.2 ); the dark areas represent regions where the diffracted light from the particles arrives out of phase interfering destructively and the bright area represent regions where the diffracted light arrives in phase interfering constructively.

In practice, particle samples are normally not stationary but moving randomly due to collisions with solvent molecules as described by the Brownian motion, 2.4.22.4.2, where (Δx)2¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯(Δx)2¯ is the mean squared displacement in time t, and D is the diffusion constant, which is related to the hydrodynamic radius a of the particle according to the Stokes-Einstein equation, 2.4.32.4.3 , where kB is Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, and μ is viscosity of the solution. Importantly, for a system undergoing Brownian motion, small particles should diffuse faster than large ones.(Δx)2¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ = 2Δt(2.4.2)(2.4.2)(Δx)2¯ = 2ΔtD =kBT6πμa(2.4.3)(2.4.3)D =kBT6πμa

As a result of the Brownian motion, the distance between particles is constantly changing and this results in a Doppler shift between the frequency of the incident light and the frequency of the scattered light. Since the distance between particles also affects the phase overlap/interfering of the diffracted light, the brightness and darkness of the spots in the “speckle” pattern will in turn fluctuate in intensity as a function of time when the particles change position with respect to each other. Then, as the rate of these intensity fluctuations depends on how fast the particles are moving (smaller particles diffuse faster), information about the size distribution of particles in the solution could be acquired by processing the fluctuations of the intensity of scattered light. Figure 2.4.32.4.3 shows the hypothetical fluctuation of scattering intensity of larger particles and smaller particles.

In order to mathematically process the fluctuation of intensity, there are several principles/terms to be understood. First, the intensity correlation function is used to describe the rate of change in scattering intensity by comparing the intensity I(t) at time t to the intensity I(t + τ) at a later time (t + τ), and is quantified and normalized by 2.4.42.4.4 and 2.4.52.4.5 , where braces indicate averaging over t.G2(τ)= ⟨I(t)I(t + τ)⟩(2.4.4)(2.4.4)G2(τ)= ⟨I(t)I(t + τ)⟩g2(τ)=⟨I(t)I(t + τ)⟩⟨I(t)⟩2(2.4.5)(2.4.5)g2(τ)=⟨I(t)I(t + τ)⟩⟨I(t)⟩2

Second, since it is not possible to know how each particle moves from the fluctuation, the electric field correlation function is instead used to correlate the motion of the particles relative to each other, and is defined by 2.4.62.4.6 and 2.4.72.4.7 , where E(t) and E(t + τ) are the scattered electric fields at times t and t+ τ.G1(τ)= ⟨E(t)E(t + τ)⟩(2.4.6)(2.4.6)G1(τ)= ⟨E(t)E(t + τ)⟩g1(τ)=⟨E(t)E(t + τ)⟩⟨E(t)E(t)⟩(2.4.7)(2.4.7)g1(τ)=⟨E(t)E(t + τ)⟩⟨E(t)E(t)⟩

For a monodisperse system undergoing Brownian motion, g₁(τ) will decay exponentially with a decay rate Γ which is related by Brownian motion to the diffusivity by 2.4.82.4.8 , 2.4.92.4.9 , and 2.4.102.4.10 , where q is the magnitude of the scattering wave vector and q² reflects the distance the particle travels, n is the refraction index of the solution and θ is angle at which the detector is located.g1(τ)= e−Γτ(2.4.8)(2.4.8)g1(τ)= e−ΓτΓ = −Dq2(2.4.9)(2.4.9)Γ = −Dq2q=4πnλsinΘ2(2.4.10)(2.4.10)q=4πnλsinΘ2

For a polydisperse system however, g₁(τ) can no longer be represented as a single exponential decay and must be represented as a intensity-weighed integral over a distribution of decay rates G(Γ) by 2.4.112.4.11 where G(Γ) is normalized, 2.4.122.4.12 .g1(τ)=∫∞0G(Γ)e−ΓτdΓ(2.4.11)(2.4.11)g1(τ)=∫0∞G(Γ)e−ΓτdΓ∫∞0G(Γ)dΓ = 1(2.4.12)(2.4.12)∫0∞G(Γ)dΓ = 1

Third, the two correlation functions above can be equated using the Seigert relationship based on the principles of Gaussian random processes (which the scattering light usually is), and can be expressed as 2.4.132.4.13 , where β is a factor that depends on the experimental geometry, and B is the long-time value of g₂(τ), which is referred to as the baseline and is normally equal to 1. Figure 2.4.42.4.4 shows the decay of g₂(τ) for small size sample and large size sample.g2(τ)= B + β[g1(τ)]2(2.4.13)(2.4.13)g2(τ)= B + β[g1(τ)]2

When determining the size of particles in solution using DLS, g₂(τ) is calculated based on the time-dependent scattering intensity, and is converted through the Seigert relationship to g₁(τ) which usually is an exponential decay or a sum of exponential decays. The decay rate Γ is then mathematically determined (will be discussed in section ) from the g₁(τ) curve, and the value of diffusion constant D and hydrodynamic radius a can be easily calculated afterwards.

Experimental

Instrument of DLS

In a typical DLS experiment, light from a laser passes through a polarizer to define the polarization of the incident beam and then shines on the scattering medium. When the sizes of the analyzed particles are sufficiently small compared to the wavelength of the incident light, the incident light will scatters in all directions known as the Rayleigh scattering. The scattered light then passes through an analyzer, which selects a given polarization and finally enters a detector, where the position of the detector defines the scattering angle θ. In addition, the intersection of the incident beam and the beam intercepted by the detector defines a scattering region of volume V. As for the detector used in these experiments, a phototube is normally used whose dc output is proportional to the intensity of the scattered light beam. Figure 2.4.52.4.5 shows a schematic representation of the light-scattering experiment.

In modern DLS experiments, the scattered light spectral distribution is also measured. In these cases, a photomultiplier is the main detector, but the pre- and postphotomultiplier systems differ depending on the frequency change of the scattered light. The three different methods used are filter (f > 1 MHz), homodyne (f > 10 GHz), and heterodyne methods (f < 1 MHz), as schematically illustrated in Figure 2.4.62.4.6 . Note that that homodyne and heterodyne methods use no monochromator of “filter” between the scattering cell and the photomultiplier, and optical mixing techniques are used for heterodyne method. shows the schematic illustration of the various techniques used in light-scattering experiments.

As for an actual DLS instrument, take the Zetasizer Nano (Malvern Instruments Ltd.) as an example (Figure 2.4.72.4.7), it actually looks like nothing other than a big box, with components of power supply, optical unit (light source and detector), computer connection, sample holder, and accessories. The detailed procedure of how to use the DLS instrument will be introduced afterwards.

Sample Preparation

Although different DLS instruments may have different analysis ranges, we are usually looking at particles with a size range of nm to μm in solution. For several kinds of samples, DLS can give results with rather high confidence, such as monodisperse suspensions of unaggregated nanoparticles that have radius > 20 nm, or polydisperse nanoparticle solutions or stable solutions of aggregated nanoparticles that have radius in the 100 – 300 nm range with a polydispersity index of 0.3 or below. For other more challenging samples such as solutions containing large aggregates, bimodal solutions, very dilute samples, very small nanoparticles, heterogeneous samples, or unknown samples, the results given by DLS could not be really reliable, and one must be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of this analytical technique.

Then, for the sample preparation procedure, one important question is how much materials should be submit, or what is the optimal concentration of the solution. Generally, when doing the DLS measurement, it is important to submit enough amount of material in order to obtain sufficient signal, but if the sample is overly concentrated, then light scattered by one particle might be again scattered by another (known as multiple scattering), and make the data processing less accurate. An ideal sample submission for DLS analysis has a volume of 1 – 2 mL and is sufficiently concentrated as to have strong color hues, or opaqueness/turbidity in the case of a white or black sample. Alternatively, 100 – 200 μL of highly concentrated sample can be diluted to 1 mL or analyzed in a low-volume microcuvette.

In order to get high quality DLS data, there are also other issues to be concerned with. First is to minimize particulate contaminants, as it is common for a single particle contaminant to scatter a million times more than a suspended nanoparticle, by using ultra high purity water or solvents, extensively rinsing pipettes and containers, and sealing sample tightly. Second is to filter the sample through a 0.2 or 0.45 μm filter to get away of the visible particulates within the sample solution. Third is to avoid probe sonication to prevent the particulates ejected from the sonication tip, and use the bath sonication in stead.

Measurement

Now that the sample is readily prepared and put into the sample holder of the instrument, the next step is to actually do the DLS measurement. Generally the DLS instrument will be provided with software that can help you to do the measurement rather easily, but it is still worthwhile to understand the important parameters used during the measurement.

Firstly, the laser light source with an appropriate wavelength should be selected. As for the Zetasizer Nano series (Malvern Instruments Ltd.), either a 633 nm “red” laser or a 532 nm “green” laser is available. One should keep in mind that the 633 nm laser is least suitable for blue samples, while the 532 nm laser is least suitable for red samples, since otherwise the sample will just absorb a large portion of the incident light.

Then, for the measurement itself, one has to select the appropriate stabilization time and the duration time. Normally, longer striation/duration time can results in more stable signal with less noises, but the time cost should also be considered. Another important parameter is the temperature of the sample, as many DLS instruments are equipped with the temperature-controllable sample holders, one can actually measure the size distribution of the data at different temperature, and get extra information about the thermal stability of the sample analyzed.

Next, as is used in the calculation of particle size from the light scattering data, the viscosity and refraction index of the solution are also needed. Normally, for solutions with low concentration, the viscosity and refraction index of the solvent/water could be used as an approximation.

Finally, to get data with better reliability, the DLS measurement on the same sample will normally be conducted multiple times, which can help eliminate unexpected results and also provide additional error bar of the size distribution data.

Data Analysis

Although size distribution data could be readily acquired from the software of the DLS instrument, it is still worthwhile to know about the details about the data analysis process.

Cumulant method

As is mentioned in the Theory portion above, the decay rate Γ is mathematically determined from the g₁(τ) curve; if the sample solution is monodispersed, g₁(τ) could be regard as a single exponential decay function e^-Γτ, and the decay rate Γ can be in turn easily calculated. However, in most of the practical cases, the sample solution is always polydispersed, g₁(τ) will be the sum of many single exponential decay functions with different decay rates, and then it becomes significantly difficult to conduct the fitting process.

There are however, a few methods developed to meet this mathematical challenge: linear fit and cumulant expansion for mono-modal distribution, exponential sampling and CONTIN regularization for non-monomodal distribution. Among all these approaches, cumulant expansion is most common method and will be illustrated in detail in this section.

Generally, the cumulant expansion method is based on two relations: one between g₁(τ) and the moment-generating function of the distribution, and one between the logarithm of g₁(τ) and the cumulant-generating function of the distribution.

To start with, the form of g₁(τ) is equivalent to the definition of the moment-generating function M(-τ, Γ) of the distribution G(Γ), 2.4.142.4.14 .g1(τ)= ∫∞0G(Γ)e−ΓτdΓ = M(−τ,Γ)(2.4.14)(2.4.14)g1(τ)= ∫0∞G(Γ)e−ΓτdΓ = M(−τ,Γ)

The mth moment of the distribution mm(Γ)mm(Γ) is given by the mth derivative of M(-τ, Γ) with respect to τ, 2.4.152.4.15 .mm(Γ)= ∫∞0G(Γ)Γme−ΓτdΓ∣−τ=0(2.4.15)(2.4.15)mm(Γ)= ∫0∞G(Γ)Γme−ΓτdΓ∣−τ=0

Similarly, the logarithm of g₁(τ) is equivalent to the definition of the cumulant-generating function K(-τ, Γ), EQ, and the mth cumulant of the distribution km(Γ) is given by the mth derivative of K(-τ, Γ) with respect to τ, 2.4.162.4.16 and 2.4.172.4.17 .ln g1(τ)=ln M(−τ,Γ) = K(−τ,Γ)(2.4.16)(2.4.16)ln g1(τ)=ln M(−τ,Γ) = K(−τ,Γ)km(Γ)=dmK(−τ,Γ)d(−τ)m∣−τ=0(2.4.17)(2.4.17)km(Γ)=dmK(−τ,Γ)d(−τ)m∣−τ=0

By making use of that the cumulants, except for the first, are invariant under a change of origin, the km(Γ) could be rewritten in terms of the moments about the mean as 2.4.182.4.18 , 2.4.192.4.19 , 2.4.202.4.20 , and 2.4.212.4.21 where here μm are the moments about the mean, defined as given in 2.4.222.4.22 .k1(τ)k2(τ)k3(τ)k4(τ)= ∫∞0G(Γ)ΓdΓ=Γ¯= μ2= μ3= μ4−3μ22⋯(2.4.18)(2.4.19)(2.4.20)(2.4.21)(2.4.18)k1(τ)= ∫0∞G(Γ)ΓdΓ=Γ¯(2.4.19)k2(τ)= μ2(2.4.20)k3(τ)= μ3(2.4.21)k4(τ)= μ4−3μ22⋯μm = ∫∞0G(Γ)(Γ − Γ¯)mdΓ(2.4.22)(2.4.22)μm = ∫0∞G(Γ)(Γ − Γ¯)mdΓ

Based on the Taylor expansion of K(-τ, Γ) about τ = 0, the logarithm of g₁(τ) is given as 2.4.232.4.23 .ln g1(τ)= K(−τ,Γ)= −Γ¯τ +k22!τ2 −k33!τ3 +k44!τ4⋯(2.4.23)(2.4.23)ln g1(τ)= K(−τ,Γ)= −Γ¯τ +k22!τ2 −k33!τ3 +k44!τ4⋯

Importantly, if look back at the Seigert relationship in the logarithmic form, 2.4.242.4.24 .ln(g2(τ)−B)=lnβ + 2ln g1(τ)(2.4.24)(2.4.24)ln(g2(τ)−B)=lnβ + 2ln g1(τ)

The measured data of g₂(τ) could be fitted with the parameters of km using the relationship of 2.4.252.4.25 , where Γ¯Γ¯ (k₁), k₂, and k₃ describes the average, variance, and skewness (or asymmetry) of the decay rates of the distribution, and polydispersity index γ = k2Γ¯2γ = k2Γ¯2 is used to indicate the width of the distribution. And parameters beyond k₃ are seldom used to prevent overfitting the data. Finally, the size distribution can be easily calculated from the decay rate distribution as described in theory section previously. Figure 2.4.62.4.6 shows an example of data fitting using the cumulant method.ln(g2(τ)−B)=]lnβ + 2(−Γ¯τ +k22!τ2 −k33!τ3⋯)(2.4.25)(2.4.25)ln(g2(τ)−B)=]lnβ + 2(−Γ¯τ +k22!τ2 −k33!τ3⋯)

When using the cumulant expansion method however, one should keep in mind that it is only suitable for monomodal distributions (Gaussian-like distribution centered about the mean), and for non-monomodal distributions, other methods like exponential sampling and CONTIN regularization should be applied instead.

Three Index of Size Distribution

Now that the size distribution is able to be acquired from the fluctuation data of the scattered light using cumulant expansion or other methods, it is worthwhile to understand the three kinds of distribution index usually used in size analysis: number weighted distribution, volume weighted distribution, and intensity weighted distribution.

First of all, based on all the theories discussed above, it should be clear that the size distribution given by DLS experiments is the intensity weighted distribution, as it is always the intensity of the scattering that is being analyzed. So for intensity weighted distribution, the contribution of each particle is related to the intensity of light scattered by that particle. For example, using Rayleigh approximation, the relative contribution for very small particles will be proportional to a⁶.

For number weighted distribution, given by image analysis as an example, each particle is given equal weighting irrespective of its size, which means proportional to a⁰. This index is most useful where the absolute number of particles is important, or where high resolution (particle by particle) is required.

For volume weighted distribution, given by laser diffraction as an example, the contribution of each particle is related to the volume of that particle, which is proportional to a³. This is often extremely useful from a commercial perspective as the distribution represents the composition of the sample in terms of its volume/mass, and therefore its potential money value.

When comparing particle size data for the same sample represented using different distribution index, it is important to know that the results could be very different from number weighted distribution to intensity weighted distribution. This is clearly illustrated in the example below (Figure 2.4.92.4.9 ), for a sample consisting of equal numbers of particles with diameters of 5 nm and 50 nm. The number weighted distribution gives equal weighting to both types of particles, emphasizing the presence of the finer 5 nm particles, whereas the intensity weighted distribution has a signal one million times higher for the coarser 50 nm particles. The volume weighted distribution is intermediate between the two.

Furthermore, based on the different orders of correlation between the particle contribution and the particle size a, it is possible to convert particle size data from one type of distribution to another type of distribution, and that is also why the DLS software can also give size distributions in three different forms (number, volume, and intensity), where the first two kinds are actually deducted from the raw data of intensity weighted distribution.

An Example of an Application

As the DLS method could be used in many areas towards size distribution such as polymers, proteins, metal nanoparticles, or carbon nanomaterials, here gives an example about the application of DLS in size-controlled synthesis of monodisperse gold nanoparticles.

The size and size distribution of gold particles are controlled by subtle variation of the structure of the polymer, which is used to stabilize the gold nanoparticles during the reaction. These variations include monomer type, polymer molecular weight, end-group hydrophobicity, end-group denticity, and polymer concentration; a total number of 88 different trials have been conducted based on these variations. By using the DLS method, the authors are able to determine the gold particle size distribution for all these trials rather easily, and the correlation between polymer structure and particle size can also be plotted without further processing the data. Although other sizing techniques such as UV-V spectroscopy and TEM are also used in this paper, it is the DLS measurement that provides a much easier and reliable approach towards the size distribution analysis.

Comparison with TEM and AFM

Since DLS is not the only method available to determine the size distribution of particles, it is also necessary to compare DLS with the other common-used general sizing techniques, especially TEM and AFM.

First of all, it has to be made clear that both TEM and AFM measure particles that are deposited on a substrate (Cu grid for TEM, mica for AFM), while DLS measures particles that are dispersed in a solution. In this way, DLS will be measuring the bulk phase properties and give a more comprehensive information about the size distribution of the sample. And for AFM or TEM, it is very common that a relatively small sampling area is analyzed, and the size distribution on the sampling area may not be the same as the size distribution of the original sample depending on how the particles are deposited.

On the other hand however, for DLS, the calculating process is highly dependent on the mathematical and physical assumptions and models, which is, monomodal distribution (cumulant method) and spherical shape for the particles, the results could be inaccurate when analyzing non-monomodal distributions or non-spherical particles. Yet, since the size determining process for AFM or TEM is nothing more than measuring the size from the image and then using the statistic, these two methods can provide much more reliable data when dealing with “irregular” samples.

Another important issue to consider is the time cost and complication of size measurement. Generally speaking, the DLS measurement should be a much easier technique, which requires less operation time and also cheaper equipment. And it could be really troublesome to analysis the size distribution data coming out from TEM or AFM images without specially programmed software.

In addition, there are some special issues to consider when choosing size analysis techniques. For example, if the originally sample is already on a substrate (synthesized by the CVD method), or the particles could not be stably dispersed within solution, apparently the DLS method is not suitable. Also, when the particles tend to have a similar imaging contrast against the substrate (carbon nanomaterials on TEM grid), or tend to self-assemble and aggregate on the surface of the substrate, the DLS approach might be a better choice.

In general research work however, the best way to do size distribution analysis is to combine these analyzing methods, and get complimentary information from different aspects. One thing to keep in mind, since the DLS actually measures the hydrodynamic radius of the particles, the size from DLS measurement is always larger than the size from AFM or TEM measurement. As a conclusion, the comparison between DLS and AFM/TEM is shown in Table 2.4.12.4.1 .

Conclusion

In general, relying on the fluctuating Rayleigh scattering of small particles that randomly moves in solution, DLS is a very useful and rapid technique used in the size distribution of particles in the fields of physics, chemistry, and bio-chemistry, especially for monomodally dispersed spherical particles, and by combining with other techniques such as AFM and TEM, a comprehensive understanding of the size distribution of the analyte can be readily acquired.

Only 10$ for interpretation of your UV-Vis spectrum
Payment Upon Completion

 Send your UV-Vis spectra...

In Figure 10.9 we examined Nessler’s original method for matching the color of a sample to the color of a standard. Matching the colors was a labor intensive process for the analyst. Not surprisingly, spectroscopic methods of analysis were slow to develop. The 1930s and 1940s saw the introduction of photoelectric transducers for ultraviolet and visible radiation, and thermocouples for infrared radiation. As a result, modern instrumentation for absorption spectroscopy became routinely available in the 1940s—progress has been rapid ever since.

10.3.1 Instrumentation

Frequently an analyst must select—from among several instruments of different design—the one instrument best suited for a particular analysis. In this section we examine several different instruments for molecular absorption spectroscopy, emphasizing their advantages and limitations. Methods of sample introduction are also covered in this section.

Instrument Designs for Molecular UV/Vis Absorption

Filter Photometer. The simplest instrument for molecular UV/Vis absorption is a filter photometer (Figure 10.25), which uses an absorption or interference filter to isolate a band of radiation. The filter is placed between the source and the sample to prevent the sample from decomposing when exposed to higher energy radiation. A filter photometer has a single optical path between the source and detector, and is called a single-beam instrument. The instrument is calibrated to 0% T while using a shutter to block the source radiation from the detector. After opening the shutter, the instrument is calibrated to 100% T using an appropriate blank. The blank is then replaced with the sample and its transmittance measured. Because the source’s incident power and the sensitivity of the detector vary with wavelength, the photometer must be recalibrated whenever the filter is changed. Photometers have the advantage of being relatively inexpensive, rugged, and easy to maintain. Another advantage of a photometer is its portability, making it easy to take into the field. Disadvantages of a photometer include the inability to record an absorption spectrum and the source’s relatively large effective bandwidth, which limits the calibration curve’s linearity.

Note

The percent transmittance varies between 0% and 100%. As we learned in Figure 10.21, we use a blank to determine P₀, which corresponds to 100% T. Even in the absence of light the detector records a signal. Closing the shutter allows us to assign 0% T to this signal. Together, setting 0% T and 100% T calibrates the instrument. The amount of light passing through a sample produces a signal that is greater than or equal to that for 0% T and smaller than or equal to that for 100%T.

Figure 10.25 Schematic diagram of a filter photometer. The analyst either inserts a removable filter or the filters are placed in a carousel, an example of which is shown in the photographic inset. The analyst selects a filter by rotating it into place.

Single-Beam Spectrophotometer. An instrument that uses a monochromator for wavelength selection is called a spectrophotometer. The simplest spectrophotometer is a single-beam instrument equipped with a fixed-wavelength monochromator (Figure 10.26). Single-beam spectrophotometers are calibrated and used in the same manner as a photometer. One example of a single-beam spectrophotometer is Thermo Scientific’s Spectronic 20D+, which is shown in the photographic insert to Figure 10.26. The Spectronic 20D+ has a range of 340–625 nm (950 nm when using a red-sensitive detector), and a fixed effective bandwidth of 20 nm. Battery-operated, hand-held single-beam spectrophotometers are available, which are easy to transport into the field. Other single-beam spectrophotometers also are available with effective bandwidths of 2–8 nm. Fixed wavelength single-beam spectrophotometers are not practical for recording spectra because manually adjusting the wavelength and recalibrating the spectrophotometer is awkward and time-consuming. The accuracy of a single-beam spectrophotometer is limited by the stability of its source and detector over time.

Figure 10.26 Schematic diagram of a fixed-wavelength single-beam spectrophotometer. The photographic inset shows a typical instrument. The shutter remains closed until the sample or blank is placed in the sample compartment. The analyst manually selects the wavelength by adjusting the wavelength dial. Inset photo modified from: Adi (www.commons.wikipedia.org).

Double-Beam Spectrophotometer. The limitations of fixed-wavelength, single-beam spectrophotometers are minimized by using a double-beamspectrophotometer (Figure 10.27). A chopper controls the radiation’s path, alternating it between the sample, the blank, and a shutter. The signal processor uses the chopper’s known speed of rotation to resolve the signal reaching the detector into the transmission of the blank, P₀, and the sample, P_T. By including an opaque surface as a shutter, it is possible to continuously adjust 0% T. The effective bandwidth of a double-beam spectrophotometer is controlled by adjusting the monochromator’s entrance and exit slits. Effective bandwidths of 0.2–3.0 nm are common. A scanning monochromator allows for the automated recording of spectra. Double-beam instruments are more versatile than single-beam instruments, being useful for both quantitative and qualitative analyses, but also are more expensive.

Figure 10.27 Schematic diagram of a scanning, double-beam spectrophotometer. A chopper directs the source’s radiation, using a transparent window to pass radiation to the sample and a mirror to reflect radiation to the blank. The chopper’s opaque surface serves as a shutter, which allows for a constant adjustment of the spectrophotometer’s 0% T. The photographic insert shows a typical instrument. The unit in the middle of the photo is a temperature control unit that allows the sample to be heated or cooled.

Diode Array Spectrometer. An instrument with a single detector can monitor only one wavelength at a time. If we replace a single photomultiplier with many photodiodes, we can use the resulting array of detectors to record an entire spectrum simultaneously in as little as 0.1 s. In a diode array spectrometer the source radiation passes through the sample and is dispersed by a grating (Figure 10.28). The photodiode array is situated at the grating’s focal plane, with each diode recording the radiant power over a narrow range of wavelengths. Because we replace a full monochromator with just a grating, a diode array spectrometer is small and compact.

Figure 10.28 Schematic diagram of a diode array spectrophotometer. The photographic insert shows a typical instrument. Note that the 50-mL beaker provides a sense of scale.

One advantage of a diode array spectrometer is the speed of data acquisition, which allows to collect several spectra for a single sample. Individual spectra are added and averaged to obtain the final spectrum. This signal averaging improves a spectrum’s signal-to-noise ratio. If we add together n spectra, the sum of the signal at any point, x, increases as nS_x, where S_x is the signal. The noise at any point, N_x, is a random event, which increases as √nN_x when we add together nspectra. The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) after n scans isSN=nSxn−−√Nx=n−−√SxnNx(4.8.1)(4.8.1)SN=nSxnNx=nSxnNx

where S_x/N_x is the signal-to-noise ratio for a single scan. The impact of signal averaging is shown in Figure 10.29. The first spectrum shows the signal for a single scan, which consists of a single, noisy peak. Signal averaging using 4 scans and 16 scans decreases the noise and improves the signal-to-noise ratio. One disadvantage of a photodiode array is that the effective bandwidth per diode is roughly an order of magnitude larger than that for a high quality monochromator.

Figure 10.29 Effect of signal averaging on a spectrum’s signal-to-noise ratio. From top to bottom: spectrum for a single scan; average spectrum after four scans; and average spectrum after adding 16 scans.

Sample Cells. The sample compartment provides a light-tight environment that limits the addition of stray radiation. Samples are normally in the liquid or solution state, and are placed in cells constructed with UV/Vis transparent materials, such as quartz, glass, and plastic (Figure 10.30). A quartz or fused-silica cell is required when working at a wavelength <300 nm where other materials show a significant absorption. The most common pathlength is 1 cm (10 mm), although cells with shorter (as little as 0.1 cm) and longer pathlengths (up to 10 cm) are available. Longer pathlength cells are useful when analyzing a very dilute solution, or for gas samples. The highest quality cells allow the radiation to strike a flat surface at a 90^o angle, minimizing the loss of radiation to reflection. A test tube is often used as a sample cell with simple, single-beam instruments, although differences in the cell’s pathlength and optical properties add an additional source of error to the analysis.

Figure 10.30 Examples of sample cells for UV/Vis spectroscopy. From left to right (with path lengths in parentheses): rectangular plastic cuvette (10.0 mm), rectangular quartz cuvette (5.000 mm), rectangular quartz cuvette (1.000 mm), cylindrical quartz cuvette (10.00 mm), cylindrical quartz cuvette (100.0 mm). Cells often are available as a matched pair, which is important when using a double-beam instrument.

If we need to monitor an analyte’s concentration over time, it may not be possible to physically remove samples for analysis. This is often the case, for example, when monitoring industrial production lines or waste lines, when monitoring a patient’s blood, or when monitoring environmental systems. With a fiber-optic probe we can analyze samples in situ. An example of a remote sensing fiber-optic probe is shown in Figure 10.31. The probe consists of two bundles of fiber-optic cable. One bundle transmits radiation from the source to the probe’s tip, which is designed to allow the sample to flow through the sample cell. Radiation from the source passes through the solution and is reflected back by a mirror. The second bundle of fiber-optic cable transmits the nonabsorbed radiation to the wavelength selector. Another design replaces the flow cell shown in Figure 10.31 with a membrane containing a reagent that reacts with the analyte. When the analyte diffuses across the membrane it reacts with the reagent, producing a product that absorbs UV or visible radiation. The nonabsorbed radiation from the source is reflected or scattered back to the detector. Fiber optic probes that show chemical selectivity are called optrodes.⁶

Figure 10.31 Example of a fiber-optic probe. The inset photographs provide a close-up look at the probe’s flow cell and the reflecting mirror.

Instrument Designs for Infrared Absorption

Filter Photometer. The simplest instrument for IR absorption spectroscopy is a filter photometer similar to that shown in Figure 10.25 for UV/Vis absorption. These instruments have the advantage of portability, and typically are used as dedicated analyzers for gases such as HCN and CO.

Double-beam spectrophotometer. Infrared instruments using a monochromator for wavelength selection use double-beam optics similar to that shown in Figure 10.27. Double-beam optics are preferred over single-beam optics because the sources and detectors for infrared radiation are less stable than those for UV/Vis radiation. In addition, it is easier to correct for the absorption of infrared radiation by atmospheric CO₂ and H₂O vapor when using double-beam optics. Resolutions of 1–3 cm^–1 are typical for most instruments.

Fourier transform spectrometer. In a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, or FT–IR, the monochromator is replaced with an interferometer (Figure 10.13). Because an FT-IR includes only a single optical path, it is necessary to collect a separate spectrum to compensate for the absorbance of atmospheric CO₂ and H₂O vapor. This is done by collecting a background spectrum without the sample and storing the result in the instrument’s computer memory. The background spectrum is removed from the sample’s spectrum by ratioing the two signals. In comparison to other instrument designs, an FT–IR provides for rapid data acquisition, allowing an enhancement in signal-to-noise ratio through signal-averaging.

Sample Cells. Infrared spectroscopy is routinely used to analyze gas, liquid, and solid samples. Sample cells are made from materials, such as NaCl and KBr, that are transparent to infrared radiation. Gases are analyzed using a cell with a pathlength of approximately 10 cm. Longer pathlengths are obtained by using mirrors to pass the beam of radiation through the sample several times.

A liquid samples may be analyzed using a variety of different sample cells (Figure 10.32). For non-volatile liquids a suitable sample can be prepared by placing a drop of the liquid between two NaCl plates, forming a thin film that typically is less than 0.01 mm thick. Volatile liquids must be placed in a sealed cell to prevent their evaporation.

Figure 10.32 Three examples of IR sample cells: (a) NaCl salts plates; (b) fixed pathlength (0.5 mm) sample cell with NaCl windows; (c) disposable card with a polyethylene window that is IR transparent with the exception of strong absorption bands at 2918 cm^–1 and 2849 cm^–1.

The analysis of solution samples is limited by the solvent’s IR absorbing properties, with CCl₄, CS₂, and CHCl₃ being the most common solvents. Solutions are placed in cells containing two NaCl windows separated by a Teflon spacer. By changing the Teflon spacer, pathlengths from 0.015–1.0 mm can be obtained.

Transparent solid samples can be analyzed directly by placing them in the IR beam. Most solid samples, however, are opaque, and must be dispersed in a more transparent medium before recording the IR spectrum. If a suitable solvent is available, then the solid can be analyzed by preparing a solution and analyzing as described above. When a suitable solvent is not available, solid samples may be analyzed by preparing a mull of the finely powdered sample with a suitable oil. Alternatively, the powdered sample can be mixed with KBr and pressed into an optically transparent pellet.

The analysis of an aqueous sample is complicated by the solubility of the NaCl cell window in water. One approach to obtaining infrared spectra on aqueous solutions is to use attenuated total reflectance instead of transmission. Figure 10.33 shows a diagram of a typical attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FT–IR instrument. The ATR cell consists of a high refractive index material, such as ZnSe or diamond, sandwiched between a low refractive index substrate and a lower refractive index sample. Radiation from the source enters the ATR crystal where it undergoes a series of total internal reflections before exiting the crystal. During each reflection the radiation penetrates into the sample to a depth of a few microns. The result is a selective attenuation of the radiation at those wavelengths where the sample absorbs. ATR spectra are similar, but not identical, to those obtained by measuring the transmission of radiation.

Figure 10.33 FT-IR spectrometer equipped with a diamond ATR sample cell. The inserts show a close-up photo of the sample platform, a sketch of the ATR’s sample slot, and a schematic showing how the source’s radiation interacts with the sample. The pressure tower is used to ensure the contact of solid samples with the ATR crystal.

Solid samples also can be analyzed using an ATR sample cell. After placing the solid in the sample slot, a compression tip ensures that it is in contact with the ATR crystal. Examples of solids that have been analyzed by ATR include polymers, fibers, fabrics, powders, and biological tissue samples. Another reflectance method is diffuse reflectance, in which radiation is reflected from a rough surface, such as a powder. Powdered samples are mixed with a non-absorbing material, such as powdered KBr, and the reflected light is collected and analyzed. As with ATR, the resulting spectrum is similar to that obtained by conventional transmission methods.

Note

Further details about these, and other methods for preparing solids for infrared analysis can be found in this chapter’s additional resources.

10.3.2 Quantitative Applications

The determination of an analyte’s concentration based on its absorption of ultraviolet or visible radiation is one of the most frequently encountered quantitative analytical methods. One reason for its popularity is that many organic and inorganic compounds have strong absorption bands in the UV/Vis region of the electromagnetic spectrum. In addition, if an analyte does not absorb UV/Vis radiation—or if its absorbance is too weak—we often can react it with another species that is strongly absorbing. For example, a dilute solution of Fe²⁺ does not absorb visible light. Reacting Fe²⁺ with o-phenanthroline, however, forms an orange–red complex of Fe(phen)₃²⁺ that has a strong, broad absorbance band near 500 nm. An additional advantage to UV/Vis absorption is that in most cases it is relatively easy to adjust experimental and instrumental conditions so that Beer’s law is obeyed.

Note

Figure 10.18 shows the visible spectrum for Fe(phen)₃²⁺.

A quantitative analysis based on the absorption of infrared radiation, although important, is less frequently encountered than those for UV/Vis absorption. One reason is the greater tendency for instrumental deviations from Beer’s law when using infrared radiation. Because an infrared absorption band is relatively narrow, any deviation due to the lack of monochromatic radiation is more pronounced. In addition, infrared sources are less intense than UV/Vis sources, making stray radiation more of a problem. Differences in pathlength for samples and standards when using thin liquid films or KBr pellets are a problem, although an internal standard can be used to correct for any difference in pathlength. Finally, establishing a 100% T (A = 0) baseline is often difficult because the optical properties of NaCl sample cells may change significantly with wavelength due to contamination and degradation. We can minimize this problem by measuring absorbance relative to a baseline established for the absorption band. Figure 10.34 shows how this is accomplished.

Note

Another approach is to use a cell with a fixed pathlength, such as that shown in Figure 10.32b.

Figure 10.34 Method for determining absorbance from an IR spectrum.

Environmental Applications

The analysis of waters and wastewaters often relies on the absorption of ultraviolet and visible radiation. Many of these methods are outlined in Table 10.6. Several of these methods are described here in more detail.

Although the quantitative analysis of metals in waters and wastewaters is accomplished primarily by atomic absorption or atomic emission spectroscopy, many metals also can be analyzed following the formation of a colored metal–ligand complex. One advantage to these spectroscopic methods is that they are easily adapted to the analysis of samples in the field using a filter photometer. One ligand that is used in the analysis of several metals is diphenylthiocarbazone, also known as dithizone. Dithizone is not soluble in water, but when a solution of dithizone in CHCl₃ is shaken with an aqueous solution containing an appropriate metal ion, a colored metal–dithizonate complex forms that is soluble in CHCl₃. The selectivity of dithizone is controlled by adjusting the sample’s pH. For example, Cd²⁺ is extracted from solutions that are made strongly basic with NaOH, Pb²⁺ from solutions that are made basic with an NH₃/NH₄⁺ buffer, and Hg²⁺ from solutions that are slightly acidic.

Note

Atomic absorption is the subject of Section 10.4 and atomic emission is the subject of Section 10.7.

The structure of dithizone is shown to the right. See Chapter 7 for a discussion of extracting metal ions using dithizone.

When chlorine is added to water the portion available for disinfection is called the chlorine residual. There are two forms of chlorine residual. The free chlorine residual includes Cl₂, HOCl, and OCl^–. The combined chlorine residual, which forms from the reaction of NH₃ with HOCl, consists of monochloramine, NH₂Cl, dichloramine, NHCl₂, and trichloramine, NCl₃. Because the free chlorine residual is more efficient at disinfection, there is an interest in methods that can distinguish between the different forms of the total chlorine residual. One such method is the leuco crystal violet method. The free residual chlorine is determined by adding leuco crystal violet to the sample, which instantaneously oxidizes to give a blue colored compound that is monitored at 592 nm. Completing the analysis in less than five minutes prevents a possible interference from the combined chlorine residual. The total chlorine residual (free + combined) is determined by reacting a separate sample with iodide, which reacts with both chlorine residuals to form HOI. When the reaction is complete, leuco crystal violet is added and oxidized by HOI, giving the same blue colored product. The combined chlorine residual is determined by difference.

Note

In Chapter 9 we explored how the total chlorine residual can be determined by a redox titration; see Representative Method 9.3 for further details. The method described here allows us to divide the total chlorine residual into its component parts.

The concentration of fluoride in drinking water may be determined indirectly by its ability to form a complex with zirconium. In the presence of the dye SPADNS, solutions of zirconium form a red colored compound, called a lake, that absorbs at 570 nm. When fluoride is added, the formation of the stable ZrF₆^2– complex causes a portion of the lake to dissociate, decreasing the absorbance. A plot of absorbance versus the concentration of fluoride, therefore, has a negative slope.

Note

SPADNS, which is shown below, is an abbreviation for the sodium salt of 2-(4-sulfophenylazo)-1,8-dihydroxy-3,6-napthalenedisulfonic acid, which is a mouthful to say.

Spectroscopic methods also are used to determine organic constituents in water. For example, the combined concentrations of phenol, and ortho- and meta- substituted phenols are determined by using steam distillation to separate the phenols from nonvolatile impurities. The distillate reacts with 4-aminoantipyrine at pH 7.9 ± 0.1 in the presence of K₃Fe(CN)₆, forming a yellow colored antipyrine dye. After extracting the dye into CHCl₃, its absorbance is monitored at 460 nm. A calibration curve is prepared using only the unsubstituted phenol, C₆H₅OH. Because the molar absorptivity of substituted phenols are generally less than that for phenol, the reported concentration represents the minimum concentration of phenolic compounds.

Molecular absorption also can be used for the analysis of environmentally significant airborne pollutants. In many cases the analysis is carried out by collecting the sample in water, converting the analyte to an aqueous form that can be analyzed by methods such as those described in Table 10.6. For example, the concentration of NO₂ can be determined by oxidizing NO₂ to NO₃^–. The concentration of NO₃^– is then determined by first reducing it to NO₂^– with Cd, and then reacting NO₂^– with sulfanilamide and N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine to form a red azo dye. Another important application is the analysis for SO₂, which is determined by collecting the sample in an aqueous solution of HgCl₄^2– where it reacts to form Hg(SO₃)₂^2–. Addition of p-rosaniline and formaldehyde produces a purple complex that is monitored at 569 nm. Infrared absorption is useful for the analysis of organic vapors, including HCN, SO₂, nitrobenzene, methyl mercaptan, and vinyl chloride. Frequently, these analyses are accomplished using portable, dedicated infrared photometers.

Clinical Applications

The analysis of clinical samples is often complicated by the complexity of the sample matrix, which may contribute a significant background absorption at the desired wavelength. The determination of serum barbiturates provides one example of how this problem is overcome. The barbiturates are first extracted from a sample of serum with CHCl₃ and then extracted from the CHCl₃ into 0.45 M NaOH (pH ≈ 13). The absorbance of the aqueous extract is measured at 260 nm, and includes contributions from the barbiturates as well as other components extracted from the serum sample. The pH of the sample is then lowered to approximately 10 by adding NH₄Cl and the absorbance remeasured. Because the barbiturates do not absorb at this pH, we can use the absorbance at pH 10, A_pH 10, to correct the absorbance at pH 13, A_pH 13Abarb=ApH 13−Vsamp+VNH4ClVsamp×ApH 10(4.8.2)(4.8.2)Abarb=ApH 13−Vsamp+VNH4ClVsamp×ApH 10

where A_barb is the absorbance due to the serum barbiturates, and V_samp and V_NH4Cl are the volumes of sample and NH₄Cl, respectively. Table 10.7 provides a summary of several other methods for analyzing clinical samples.

Industrial Analysis

UV/Vis molecular absorption is used for the analysis of a diverse array of industrial samples including pharmaceuticals, food, paint, glass, and metals. In many cases the methods are similar to those described in Table 10.6 and Table 10.7. For example, the amount of iron in food can be determined by bringing the iron into solution and analyzing using the o-phenanthroline method listed in Table 10.6.

Many pharmaceutical compounds contain chromophores that make them suitable for analysis by UV/Vis absorption. Products that have been analyzed in this fashion include antibiotics, hormones, vitamins, and analgesics. One example of the use of UV absorption is in determining the purity of aspirin tablets, for which the active ingredient is acetylsalicylic acid. Salicylic acid, which is produced by the hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid, is an undesirable impurity in aspirin tablets, and should not be present at more than 0.01% w/w. Samples can be screened for unacceptable levels of salicylic acid by monitoring the absorbance at a wavelength of 312 nm. Acetylsalicylic acid absorbs at 280 nm, but absorbs poorly at 312 nm. Conditions for preparing the sample are chosen such that an absorbance of greater than 0.02 signifies an unacceptable level of salicylic acid.

Forensic Applications

UV/Vis molecular absorption is routinely used for the analysis of narcotics and for drug testing. One interesting forensic application is the determination of blood alcohol using the Breathalyzer test. In this test a 52.5-mL breath sample is bubbled through an acidified solution of K₂Cr₂O₇, which oxidizes ethanol to acetic acid. The concentration of ethanol in the breath sample is determined by the decrease in absorbance at 440 nm where the dichromate ion absorbs. A blood alcohol content of 0.10%, which is above the legal limit, corresponds to 0.025 mg of ethanol in the breath sample.

Developing a Quantitative Method for a Single Component

In developing a quantitative analytical method, the conditions under which Beer’s law is obeyed must be established. First, the most appropriate wavelength for the analysis is determined from an absorption spectrum. In most cases the best wavelength corresponds to an absorption maximum because it provides greater sensitivity and is less susceptible to instrumental limitations. Second, if an instrument with adjustable slits is being used, then an appropriate slit width needs to be chosen. The absorption spectrum also aids in selecting a slit width. Usually we set the slits to be as wide as possible because this increases the throughput of source radiation, while also being narrow enough to avoid instrumental limitations to Beer’s law. Finally, a calibration curve is constructed to determine the range of concentrations for which Beer’s law is valid. Additional considerations that are important in any quantitative method are the effect of potential interferents and establishing an appropriate blank.

Note

The best way to appreciate the theoretical and practical details discussed in this section is to carefully examine a typical analytical method. Although each method is unique, the following description of the determination of iron in water and wastewater provides an instructive example of a typical procedure. The description here is based on Method 3500- Fe B as published in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Ed., American Public Health Association: Washington, D. C., 1998.

Representative Method 10.1

Determination of Iron in Water and Wastewater

Description of Method

Iron in the +2 oxidation state reacts with o-phenanthroline to form the orange-red Fe(phen)₃²⁺ complex. The intensity of the complex’s color is independent of solution acidity between a pH of 3 and 9. Because the complex forms more rapidly at lower pH levels, the reaction is usually carried out within a pH range of 3.0–3.5. Any iron present in the +3 oxidation state is reduced with hydroxylamine before adding o-phenanthroline. The most important interferents are strong oxidizing agents, polyphosphates, and metal ions such as Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺, Ni²⁺, and Cd²⁺. An interference from oxidizing agents is minimized by adding an excess of hydroxylamine, and an interference from polyphosphate is minimized by boiling the sample in the presence of acid. The absorbance of samples and standards are measured at a wavelength of 510 nm using a 1-cm cell (longer pathlength cells also may be used). Beer’s law is obeyed for concentrations of within the range of 0.2–4.0 mg Fe/L.

(Figure 10.18 shows the visible spectrum for Fe(phen)₃²⁺.)

Procedure

For samples containing less than 2 mg Fe/L, directly transfer a 50-mL portion to a 125-mL Erlenmeyer flask. Samples containing more than 2 mg Fe/L must be diluted before acquiring the 50-mL portion. Add 2 mL of concentrated HCl and 1 mL of hydroxylamine to the sample. Heat the solution to boiling and continue boiling until the solution’s volume is reduced to between 15 and 20 mL. After cooling to room temperature, transfer the solution to a 50-mL volumetric flask, add 10 mL of an ammonium acetate buffer, 2 mL of a 1000 ppm solution of o-phenanthroline, and dilute to volume. Allow 10–15 minutes for color development before measuring the absorbance, using distilled water to set 100% T. Calibration standards, including a blank, are prepared by the same procedure using a stock solution containing a known concentration of Fe²⁺.

Questions

1. Explain why strong oxidizing agents are interferents, and why an excess of hydroxylamine prevents the interference.

A strong oxidizing agent oxidizes some Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺. Because Fe(phen)₃³⁺ does not absorb as strongly as Fe(phen)₃²⁺, the absorbance decreases, producing a negative determinate error. The excess hydroxylamine reacts with the oxidizing agents, removing them from the solution.

2. The color of the complex is stable between pH levels of 3 and 9. What are some possible complications at more acidic or more basic pH’s?

Because o-phenanthroline is a weak base, its conditional formation constant for Fe(phen)₃²⁺ is less favorable at more acidic pH levels, where o-phenanthroline is protonated. The result is a decrease in absorbance and a less sensitive analytical method.

(In Chapter 9 we saw the same effect of pH on the complexation reactions between EDTA and metal ions.)

When the pH is greater than 9, competition between OH^– and o-phenanthroline for Fe²⁺ also decreased the absorbance. In addition, if the pH is sufficiently basic there is a risk that the iron will precipitate as Fe(OH)₂.

3. Cadmium is an interferent because it forms a precipitate with o-phenanthroline. What effect would the formation of precipitate have on the determination of iron?

Because o-phenanthroline is present in large excess (2000 μg of o-phenanthroline for 100 μg of Fe²⁺), it is not likely that the interference is due to an insufficient amount of o-phenanthroline being available to react with the Fe²⁺. The presence of a precipitate in the sample cell results in the scattering of radiation, which causes an apparent increase in absorbance. Because the measured absorbance increases, the reported concentration is too high.

(Although scattering is a problem here, it can serve as the basis of a useful analytical method. See Section 10.8 for further details.)

4. Even high quality ammonium acetate contains a significant amount of iron. Why is this source of iron not a problem?

Because all samples and standards are prepared using the same volume of ammonium acetate buffer, the contribution of this source of iron is accounted for by the calibration curve’s reagent blank.

Quantitative Analysis for a Single Analyte

To determine the concentration of a an analyte we measure its absorbance and apply Beer’s law using any of the standardization methods described in Chapter 5. The most common methods are a normal calibration curve using external standards and the method of standard additions. A single point standardization is also possible, although we must first verify that Beer’s law holds for the concentration of analyte in the samples and the standard.

Example 10.5

The determination of Fe in an industrial waste stream was carried out by the o‑phenanthroline described in Representative Method 10.1. Using the data in the following table, determine the mg Fe/L in the waste stream.

Solution

Linear regression of absorbance versus the concentration of Fe in the standards gives a calibration curve with the following equation.A=0.0006+0.1817×(mgFe/L)(4.8.3)(4.8.3)A=0.0006+0.1817×(mgFe/L)

Substituting the sample’s absorbance into the calibration expression gives the concentration of Fe in the waste stream as 1.48 mg Fe/L.

Practice Exercise 10.5

The concentration of Cu²⁺ in a sample can be determined by reacting it with the ligand cuprizone and measuring its absorbance at 606 nm in a 1.00-cm cell. When a 5.00-mL sample is treated with cuprizone and diluted to 10.00 mL, the resulting solution has an absorbance of 0.118. A second 5.00-mL sample is mixed with 1.00 mL of a 20.00 mg/L standard of Cu²⁺, treated with cuprizone and diluted to 10.00 mL, giving an absorbance of 0.162. Report the mg Cu²⁺/L in the sample.

Click here to review your answer to this exercise.

Quantitative Analysis of Mixtures

Suppose we need to determine the concentration of two analytes, X and Y, in a sample. If each analyte has a wavelength where the other analyte does not absorb, then we can proceed using the approach in Example 10.5. Unfortunately, UV/Vis absorption bands are so broad that it frequently is not possible to find suitable wavelengths. Because Beer’s law is additive the mixture’s absorbance, A_mix, is(Amix)λ1=(εX)λ1bCX+(εY)λ1bCY(10.11)(10.11)(Amix)λ1=(εX)λ1bCX+(εY)λ1bCY

where λ1 is the wavelength at which we measure the absorbance. Because equation 10.11 includes terms for the concentration of both X and Y, the absorbance at one wavelength does not provide enough information to determine either C_X or C_Y. If we measure the absorbance at a second wavelength(Amix)λ2=(εX)λ2bCX+(εY)λ2bCY(10.12)(10.12)(Amix)λ2=(εX)λ2bCX+(εY)λ2bCY

then C_X and C_Y can be determined by solving simultaneously equation10.11 and equation 10.12. Of course, we also must determine the value for ε_X and ε_Y at each wavelength. For a mixture of n components, we must measure the absorbance at n different wavelengths.

Example 10.6

The concentrations of Fe³⁺ and Cu²⁺ in a mixture can be determined following their reaction with hexacyanoruthenate (II), Ru(CN)₆^4–, which forms a purple-blue complex with Fe³⁺ (λ_max = 550 nm) and a pale-green complex with Cu²⁺ (λ_max = 396 nm).⁷ The molar absorptivities (M^–1 cm^–1) for the metal complexes at the two wavelengths are summarized in the following table.

When a sample containing Fe³⁺ and Cu²⁺ is analyzed in a cell with a pathlength of 1.00 cm, the absorbance at 550 nm is 0.183 and the absorbance at 396 nm is 0.109. What are the molar concentrations of Fe³⁺ and Cu²⁺ in the sample?

Solution

Substituting known values into equations 10.11 and 10.12 givesA550=0.183=9970CFe+34CCu(4.8.4)(4.8.4)A550=0.183=9970CFe+34CCuA396=0.109=84CFe+856CCu(4.8.5)(4.8.5)A396=0.109=84CFe+856CCu

To determine C_Fe and C_Cu we solve the first equation for C_CuCCu=0.183–9970CFe34(4.8.6)(4.8.6)CCu=0.183–9970CFe34

and substitute the result into the second equation.0.109=84CFe+856×0.183−9970CFe34=4.607–(2.51×105)CFe(4.8.7)(4.8.7)0.109=84CFe+856×0.183−9970CFe34=4.607–(2.51×105)CFe

Solving for C_Fe gives the concentration of Fe³⁺ as 1.79 × 10^–5 M. Substituting this concentration back into the equation for the mixture’s absorbance at 396 nm gives the concentration of Cu²⁺ as 1.26 × 10^–4 M.

(Another approach is to multiply the first equation by 856/34 giving4.607=251009CFe+856CCu(4.8.8)(4.8.8)4.607=251009CFe+856CCu

Subtracting the second equation from this equation4.607=251009CFe+856CCu−0.109=84CFe+856CCu–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––4.498=250925CFe(4.8.9)(4.8.10)(4.8.11)(4.8.9)−4.607=251009CFe+856CCu(4.8.10)−0.109=84CFe+856CCu6CCu_(4.8.11)−4.498=250925CFe

we find that C_Fe is 1.79×10^–5. Having determined C_Fe we can substitute back into one of the other equations to solve for C_Cu, which is 1.26×10^–5.)

Practice Exercise 10.6

The absorbance spectra for Cr³⁺ and Co²⁺ overlap significantly. To determine the concentration of these analytes in a mixture, its absorbance was measured at 400 nm and at 505 nm, yielding values of 0.336 and 0.187, respectively. The individual molar absorptivities (M^–1 cm^–1) are

Click here to review your answer to this exercise.

To obtain results with good accuracy and precision the two wavelengths should be selected so that ε_X > ε_Y at one wavelength and ε_X < ε_Y at the other wavelength. It is easy to appreciate why this is true. Because the absorbance at each wavelength is dominated by one analyte, any uncertainty in the concentration of the other analyte has less of an impact. Figure 10.35 shows that the choice of wavelengths for Practice Exercise 10.6 are reasonable. When the choice of wavelengths is not obvious, one method for locating the optimum wavelengths is to plot ε_X/ε_Y as function of wavelength, and determine the wavelengths where ε_X/ε_Y reaches maximum and minimum values.⁸

Note

For example, in Example 10.6 the molar absorptivity for Fe³⁺ at 550 nm is 119× that for Cu²⁺, and the molar absorptivity for Cu²⁺ at 396 nm is 10.2× that for Fe³⁺.

Figure 10.35 Visible absorption spectra for 0.0250 M Cr³⁺, 0.0750 M Co²⁺, and for a mixture of Cr³⁺ and Co²⁺. The two wavelengths used for analyzing the mixture of Cr³⁺ and Co²⁺ are shown by the dashed lines. The data for the two standard solutions are from reference 7.

When the analyte’s spectra overlap severely, such that ε_X ≈ ε_Y at all wavelength, other computational methods may provide better accuracy and precision. In a multiwavelength linear regression analysis, for example, a mixture’s absorbance is compared to that for a set of standard solutions at several wavelengths.⁹ If A_SXand A_SY are the absorbance values for standard solutions of components X and Y at any wavelength, thenASX=εXbCSX(10.13)(10.13)ASX=εXbCSXASY=εYbCSY(10.14)(10.14)ASY=εYbCSY

where C_SX and C_SY are the known concentrations of X and Y in the standard solutions. Solving equation 10.13 and equation 10.14 for ε_X and ε_Y, substituting into equation 10.11, and rearranging, givesAmixASX=CXCSX+CYCSY×ASYASX(4.8.12)(4.8.12)AmixASX=CXCSX+CYCSY×ASYASX

To determine C_X and C_Y the mixture’s absorbance and the absorbances of the standard solutions are measured at several wavelengths. Graphing A_mix/A_SX versus A_SY/A_SX gives a straight line with a slope of C_Y/C_SY and a y-intercept of C_X/C_SX. This approach is particularly helpful when it is not possible to find wavelengths where ε_X > ε_Y and ε_X < ε_Y.

Note

The approach outlined here for a multiwavelength linear regression uses a single standard solution for each analyte. A more rigorous approach uses multiple standards for each analyte. The math behind the analysis of this data—what we call a multiple linear regression—is beyond the level of this text. For more details about multiple linear regression see Brereton, R. G. Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant, Wiley: Chichester, England, 2003.

Example 10.7

Figure 10.35 shows visible absorbance spectra for a standard solution of 0.0250 M Cr³⁺, a standard solution of 0.0750 M Co²⁺, and a mixture containing unknown concentrations of each ion. The data for these spectra are shown here.¹⁰

Use a multiwavelength regression analysis to determine the composition of the unknown.

Solution

First we need to calculate values for A_mix/A_SX and for A_SY/A_SX. Let’s define X as Co²⁺ and Y as Cr³⁺. For example, at a wavelength of 375 nm A_mix/A_SX is 0.53/0.01, or 53 and A_SY/A_SX is 0.26/0.01, or 26. Completing the calculation for all wavelengths and graphing A_mix/A_SX versus A_SY/A_SXgives the result shown in Figure 10.36. Fitting a straight-line to the data gives a regression model ofAmixASX=0.636+2.01×ASYASX(4.8.13)(4.8.13)AmixASX=0.636+2.01×ASYASX

Using the y-intercept, the concentration of Co²⁺ isCXCSX=CCo0.0750M=0.636(4.8.14)(4.8.14)CXCSX=CCo0.0750M=0.636

or C_Co = 0.048 M, and using the slope the concentration of Cr³⁺ isCYCSY=CCr0.0250M=2.01(4.8.15)(4.8.15)CYCSY=CCr0.0250M=2.01

or C_Cr = 0.050 M.

Figure 10.36 Multiwavelength linear regression analysis for the data in Example 10.7.

Practice Exercise 10.7

A mixture of MnO₄^– and Cr₂O₇^2–, and standards of 0.10 mM KMnO₄ and of 0.10 mM K₂Cr₂O₇ gives the results shown in the following table. Determine the composition of the mixture. The data for this problem is from Blanco, M. C.; Iturriaga, H.; Maspoch, S.; Tarin, P. J. Chem. Educ. 1989, 66, 178–180.

(There are many additional ways to analyze mixtures spectrophotometrically, including generalized standard additions, H-point standard additions, principal component regression to name a few. Consult the chapter’s additional resources for further information.)

Click here to review your answer to this exercise.

10.3.3 Qualitative Applications

As discussed earlier in Section 10.2.1, ultraviolet, visible, and infrared absorption bands result from the absorption of electromagnetic radiation by specific valence electrons or bonds. The energy at which the absorption occurs, and its intensity is determined by the chemical environment of the absorbing moiety. For example, benzene has several ultraviolet absorption bands due to π → π* transitions. The position and intensity of two of these bands, 203.5 nm (ε = 7400 M^–1 cm^–1) and 254 nm (ε = 204 M^–1 cm^–1), are sensitive to substitution. For benzoic acid, in which a carboxylic acid group replaces one of the aromatic hydrogens, the two bands shift to 230 nm (ε = 11 600 M^–1 cm^–1) and 273 nm (ε = 970 M^–1 cm^–1). A variety of rules have been developed to aid in correlating UV/Vis absorption bands to chemical structure. Similar correlations have been developed for infrared absorption bands. For example a carbonyl’s C=O stretch is sensitive to adjacent functional groups, occurring at 1650 cm^–1 for acids, 1700 cm^–1 for ketones, and 1800 cm^–1 for acid chlorides. The interpretation of UV/Vis and IR spectra receives adequate coverage elsewhere in the chemistry curriculum, notably in organic chemistry, and is not considered further in this text.

With the availability of computerized data acquisition and storage it is possible to build digital libraries of standard reference spectra. The identity of an a unknown compound can often be determined by comparing its spectrum against a library of reference spectra, a process is known as spectral searching. Comparisons are made using an algorithm that calculates the cumulative difference between the sample’s spectrum and a reference spectrum. For example, one simple algorithm uses the following equationD=∑i=1n|(Asample)i−(Areference)i|(4.8.16)(4.8.16)D=∑i=1n|(Asample)i−(Areference)i|

where D is the cumulative difference, A_sample is the sample’s absorbance at wavelength or wavenumber i, A_reference is the absorbance of the reference compound at the same wavelength or wavenumber, and n is the number of digitized points in the spectra. The cumulative difference is calculated for each reference spectrum. The reference compound with the smallest value of D provides the closest match to the unknown compound. The accuracy of spectral searching is limited by the number and type of compounds included in the library, and by the effect of the sample’s matrix on the spectrum.

Another advantage of computerized data acquisition is the ability to subtract one spectrum from another. When coupled with spectral searching it may be possible, by repeatedly searching and subtracting reference spectra, to determine the identity of several components in a sample without the need of a prior separation step. An example is shown in Figure 10.37 in which the composition of a two-component mixture is determined by successive searching and subtraction. Figure 10.37a shows the spectrum of the mixture. A search of the spectral library selects cocaine ^. HCl (Figure 10.37b) as a likely component of the mixture. Subtracting the reference spectrum for cocaine ^. HCl from the mixture’s spectrum leaves a result (Figure 10.37c) that closely matches mannitol’s reference spectrum (Figure 10.37d). Subtracting the reference spectrum for leaves only a small residual signal (Figure 10.37e).

Figure 10.37 Identifying the components of a mixture by spectral searching and subtracting. (a) IR spectrum of the mixture; (b) Reference IR spectrum of cocaine^. HCl; (c) Result of subtracting the spectrum of cocaine ^. HCl from the mixture’s spectrum; (d) Reference IR spectrum of mannitol; and (e) The residual spectrum after removing mannitol’s contribution to the mixture’s spectrum.

Note

IR spectra traditionally are displayed using percent transmittance, %T, along the y-axis (for example, see Figure 10.16). Because absorbance—not percent transmittance—is a linear function of concentration, spectral searching and spectral subtraction, is easier to do when displaying absorbance on the y-axis.

10.3.4 Characterization Applications

Molecular absorption, particularly in the UV/Vis range, has been used for a variety of different characterization studies, including determining the stoichiometry of metal–ligand complexes and determining equilibrium constants. Both of these examples are examined in this section.

Stoichiometry of a Metal-Ligand Complex

We can determine the stoichiometry of a metal–ligand complexation reactionM+yL⇋MLy(4.8.17)(4.8.17)M+yL⇋MLy

using one of three methods: the method of continuous variations, the mole-ratio method, and the slope-ratio method. Of these approaches, the method of continuous variations, also called Job’s method, is the most popular. In this method a series of solutions is prepared such that the total moles of metal and ligand, n_total, in each solution is the same. If (n_M)_i and (n_L)_i are, respectively, the moles of metal and ligand in solution i, thenntotal=(nM)i+(nL)i(4.8.18)(4.8.18)ntotal=(nM)i+(nL)i

The relative amount of ligand and metal in each solution is expressed as the mole fraction of ligand, (X_L)_i, and the mole fraction of metal, (X_M)_i,(XL)i=(nL)intotal(4.8.19)(4.8.19)(XL)i=(nL)intotal(XM)i=1−(nL)intotal=(nM)intotal(4.8.20)(4.8.20)(XM)i=1−(nL)intotal=(nM)intotal

The concentration of the metal–ligand complex in any solution is determined by the limiting reagent, with the greatest concentration occurring when the metal and the ligand are mixed stoichiometrically. If we monitor the complexation reaction at a wavelength where only the metal–ligand complex absorbs, a graph of absorbance versus the mole fraction of ligand will have two linear branches—one when the ligand is the limiting reagent and a second when the metal is the limiting reagent. The intersection of these two branches represents a stoichiometric mixing of the metal and the ligand. We can use the mole fraction of ligand at the intersection to determine the value of y for the metal–ligand complex ML_y.y=nLnM=XLXM=XL1−XL(4.8.21)(4.8.21)y=nLnM=XLXM=XL1−XL

Note

You also can plot the data as absorbance versus the mole fraction of metal. In this case, y is equal to (1–X_M)/X_M.

Example 10.8

To determine the formula for the complex between Fe²⁺ and o-phenanthroline, a series of solutions is prepared in which the total concentration of metal and ligand is held constant at 3.15 × 10^–4 M. The absorbance of each solution is measured at a wavelength of 510 nm. Using the following data, determine the formula for the complex.

(To prepare the solutions for this example I first prepared a solution of 3.15 × 10^-4 M Fe²⁺ and a solution of 3.15 × 10^-4 M o-phenanthroline. Because the two stock solutions are of equal concentration, diluting a portion of one solution with the other solution gives a mixture in which the combined concentration of o-phenanthroline and Fe²⁺ is 3.15 × 10^-4 M. If each solution has the same volume, then each solution contains the same total moles of metal and ligand.)

Solution

A plot of absorbance versus the mole fraction of ligand is shown in Figure 10.38. To find the maximum absorbance, we extrapolate the two linear portions of the plot. The two lines intersect at a mole fraction of ligand of 0.75. Solving for y givesy=XL1–XL=0.751–0.75=3(4.8.22)(4.8.22)y=XL1–XL=0.751–0.75=3

The formula for the metal–ligand complex is Fe(o-phenanthroline)₃²⁺.

Figure 10.38 Continuous variations plot for Example 10.8. The photo shows the solutions used in gathering the data. Each solution is displayed directly below its corresponding point on the continuous variations plot.

Practice Exercise 10.8

Use the continuous variations data in the following table to determine the formula for the complex between Fe²⁺ and SCN^–. The data for this problem is adapted from Meloun, M.; Havel, J.; Högfeldt, E. Computation of Solution Equilibria, Ellis Horwood: Chichester, England, 1988, p. 236.

Click here to review your answer to this exercise.

Several precautions are necessary when using the method of continuous variations. First, the metal and the ligand must form only one metal–ligand complex. To determine if this condition is true, plots of absorbance versus X_L are constructed at several different wavelengths and for several different values of n_total. If the maximum absorbance does not occur at the same value of X_L for each set of conditions, then more than one metal–ligand complex must be present. A second precaution is that the metal–ligand complex’s absorbance must obey Beer’s law. Third, if the metal–ligand complex’s formation constant is relatively small, a plot of absorbance versus X_L may show significant curvature. In this case it is often difficult to determine the stoichiometry by extrapolation. Finally, because the stability of a metal–ligand complex may be influenced by solution conditions, the composition of the solutions must be carefully controlled. When the ligand is a weak base, for example, the solutions must be buffered to the same pH.

In the mole-ratio method the amount of one reactant, usually the moles of metal, is held constant, while the amount of the other reactant is varied. The absorbance is monitored at a wavelength where the metal–ligand complex absorbs. A plot of absorbance as a function of the ligand-to-metal mole ratio, n_L/n_M, has two linear branches, which intersect at a mole–ratio corresponding to the complex’s formula. Figure 10.39a shows a mole-ratio plot for the formation of a 1:1 complex in which the absorbance is monitored at a wavelength where only the complex absorbs. Figure 10.39b shows a mole-ratio plot for a 1:2 complex in which all three species—the metal, the ligand, and the complex—absorb at the selected wavelength. Unlike the method of continuous variations, the mole-ratio method can be used for complexation reactions that occur in a stepwise fashion if there is a difference in the molar absorptivities of the metal–ligand complexes, and if the formation constants are sufficiently different. A typical mole-ratio plot for the step-wise formation of ML and ML₂ is shown in Figure 10.39c.

Figure 10.39 Mole-ratio plots for: (a) a 1:1 metal–ligand complex in which only the complex absorbs; (b) a 1:2 metal–ligand complex in which the metal, the ligand, and the complex absorb; and (c) the stepwise formation of a 1:1 and a 1:2 metal–ligand complex.

In both the method of continuous variations and the mole-ratio method we determine the complex’s stoichiometry by extrapolating absorbance data from conditions in which there is a linear relationship between absorbance and the relative amounts of metal and ligand. If a metal–ligand complex is very weak, a plot of absorbance versus X_L or n_L/n_M may be so curved that it is impossible to determine the stoichiometry by extrapolation. In this case the slope-ratio may be used.

In the slope-ratio method two sets of solutions are prepared. The first set of solutions contains a constant amount of metal and a variable amount of ligand, chosen such that the total concentration of metal, C_M, is much larger than the total concentration of ligand, C_L. Under these conditions we may assume that essentially all the ligand reacts in forming the metal–ligand complex. The concentration of the complex, which has the general form M_xL_y, is[MxLy]=CLy(4.8.23)(4.8.23)[MxLy]=CLy

If we monitor the absorbance at a wavelength where only M_xL_y absorbs, thenA=εb[MxLy]=εbCLy(4.8.24)(4.8.24)A=εb[MxLy]=εbCLy

and a plot of absorbance versus C_L is linear with a slope, s_L, ofsL=εby(4.8.25)(4.8.25)sL=εby

A second set of solutions is prepared with a fixed concentration of ligand that is much greater than a variable concentration of metal; thus[MxLy]=CMx(4.8.26)(4.8.26)[MxLy]=CMxA=εb[MxLy]=εbCMx(4.8.27)(4.8.27)A=εb[MxLy]=εbCMxsM=εbx(4.8.28)(4.8.28)sM=εbx

A ratio of the slopes provides the relative values of x and y.sMsL=εb/xεb/y=yx(4.8.29)(4.8.29)sMsL=εb/xεb/y=yx

An important assumption in the slope-ratio method is that the complexation reaction continues to completion in the presence of a sufficiently large excess of metal or ligand. The slope-ratio method also is limited to systems in which only a single complex is formed and for which Beer’s law is obeyed.

Determination of Equilibrium Constants

Another important application of molecular absorption spectroscopy is the determination of equilibrium constants. Let’s consider, as a simple example, an acid–base reaction of the general formHIn(aq)+H2O(l)⇋H3O+(aq)+In−(aq)(4.8.30)(4.8.30)HIn(aq)+H2O(l)⇋H3O+(aq)+In−(aq)

where HIn and In^– are the conjugate weak acid and weak base forms of an acid–base indicator. The equilibrium constant for this reaction isKa=[H3O+][In−][HIn](4.8.31)(4.8.31)Ka=[H3O+][In−][HIn]

To determine the equilibrium constant’s value, we prepare a solution in which the reaction is in a state of equilibrium and determine the equilibrium concentration of H₃O⁺, HIn, and In^–. The concentration of H₃O⁺ is easy to determine by simply measuring the solution’s pH. To determine the concentration of HIn and In^– we can measure the solution’s absorbance.

If both HIn and In^– absorb at the selected wavelength, then, from equation 10.6, we know thatA=εHInb[HIn]+εInb[In−](10.15)(10.15)A=εHInb[HIn]+εInb[In−]

where ε_HIn and ε_In are the molar absorptivities for HIn and In^–. The total concentration of indicator, C, is given by a mass balance equationC=[HIn]+[In−](10.16)(10.16)C=[HIn]+[In−]

Solving equation 10.16 for [HIn] and substituting into equation 10.15 givesA=εHInb(C−[In−])+εInb[In−](4.8.32)(4.8.32)A=εHInb(C−[In−])+εInb[In−]

which we simplify toA=εHInbC−εHInb[In−]+εInb[In−](4.8.33)(4.8.33)A=εHInbC−εHInb[In−]+εInb[In−]A=AHIn+b[In−](εIn−εHIn)(10.17)(10.17)A=AHIn+b[In−](εIn−εHIn)

where A_HIn, which is equal to ε_HInbC, is the absorbance when the pH is acidic enough that essentially all the indicator is present as HIn. Solving equation 10.17 for the concentration of In^– gives[In−]=A−AHInb(εIn−εHIn)(10.18)(10.18)[In−]=A−AHInb(εIn−εHIn)

Proceeding in the same fashion, we can derive a similar equation for the concentration of HIn[HIn]=AIn−Ab(εIn−εHIn)(10.19)(10.19)[HIn]=AIn−Ab(εIn−εHIn)

where A_In, which is equal to ε_InbC, is the absorbance when the pH is basic enough that only In^– contributes to the absorbance. Substituting equation 10.18 and equation 10.19 into the equilibrium constant expression for HIn givesKa=[H3O+]A−AHInAIn−A(10.20)(10.20)Ka=[H3O+]A−AHInAIn−A

We can use equation 10.20 to determine the value of K_a in one of two ways. The simplest approach is to prepare three solutions, each of which contains the same amount, C, of indicator. The pH of one solution is made sufficiently acidic such that [HIn] >> [In⁻]. The absorbance of this solution gives A_HIn. The value of A_In is determined by adjusting the pH of the second solution such that [In⁻] >> [HIn]. Finally, the pH of the third solution is adjusted to an intermediate value, and the pH and absorbance, A, recorded. The value of K_a is calculated using equation 10.20.

Example 10.9

The acidity constant for an acid–base indicator is determined by preparing three solutions, each of which has a total indicator concentration of 5.00 × 10^–5 M. The first solution is made strongly acidic with HCl and has an absorbance of 0.250. The second solution was made strongly basic and has an absorbance of 1.40. The pH of the third solution is 2.91 and has an absorbance of 0.662. What is the value of K_a for the indicator?

Solution

The value of K_a is determined by making appropriate substitutions into 10.20; thusKa=(1.23×10−3)×0.662−0.2501.40−0.662=6.87×10−4(4.8.34)(4.8.34)Ka=(1.23×10−3)×0.662−0.2501.40−0.662=6.87×10−4

Practice Exercise 10.9

To determine the K_a of a merocyanine dye, the absorbance of a solution of 3.5×10^–4 M dye was measured at a pH of 2.00, a pH of 6.00, and a pH of 12.00, yielding absorbances of 0.000, 0.225, and 0.680, respectively. What is the value of K_a for this dye? The data for this problem is adapted from Lu, H.; Rutan, S. C. Anal. Chem., 1996, 68, 1381–1386.

Click here to review your answer to this exercise.

A second approach for determining K_a is to prepare a series of solutions, each containing the same amount of indicator. Two solutions are used to determine values for A_HIn and A_In. Taking the log of both sides of equation 10.20 and rearranging leave us with the following equation.logA−AHInAIn−A=pH−pKa(10.21)(10.21)log⁡A−AHInAIn−A=pH−pKa

A plot of log[(A – A_HIn)/(A_In – A)] versus pH is a straight-line with a slope of +1 and a y-intercept of –pK_a.

Practice Exercise 10.10

To determine the K_a of the indicator bromothymol blue, the absorbance of a series of solutions containing the same concentration of the indicator was measured at pH levels of 3.35, 3.65, 3.94, 4.30, and 4.64, yielding absorbances of 0.170, 0.287, 0.411, 0.562, and 0.670, respectively. Acidifying the first solution to a pH of 2 changes its absorbance to 0.006, and adjusting the pH of the last solution to 12 changes its absorbance to 0.818. What is the value of K_a for this day? The data for this problem is from Patterson, G. S. J. Chem. Educ., 1999, 76, 395–398.

Click here to review your answer to this exercise.

In developing these approaches for determining K_a we considered a relatively simple system in which the absorbance of HIn and In^– are easy to measure and for which it is easy to determine the concentration of H₃O⁺. In addition to acid–base reactions, we can adapt these approaches to any reaction of the general formX(aq)+Y(aq)⇋Z(aq)(4.8.35)(4.8.35)X(aq)+Y(aq)⇋Z(aq)

including metal–ligand complexation reactions and redox reactions, provided that we can determine spectrophotometrically the concentration of the product, Z, and one of the reactants, and that the concentration of the other reactant can be measured by another method. With appropriate modifications, more complicated systems, in which one or more of these parameters can not be measured, also can be treated.¹¹

10.3.5 Evaluation of UV/Vis and IR Spectroscopy

Scale of Operation

Molecular UV/Vis absorption is routinely used for the analysis of trace analytes in macro and meso samples. Major and minor analytes can be determined by diluting the sample before analysis, while concentrating a sample may allow for the analysis of ultratrace analytes. The scale of operations for infrared absorption is generally poorer than that for UV/Vis absorption.

Note

See Figure 3.5 to review the meaning of macro and meso for describing samples, and the meaning of major, minor, and ultratrace for describing analytes.

Accuracy

Under normal conditions a relative error of 1–5% is easy to obtained with UV/Vis absorption. Accuracy is usually limited by the quality of the blank. Examples of the type of problems that may be encountered include the presence of particulates in a sample that scatter radiation and interferents that react with analytical reagents. In the latter case the interferent may react to form an absorbing species, giving rise to a positive determinate error. Interferents also may prevent the analyte from reacting, leading to a negative determinate error. With care, it may be possible to improve the accuracy of an analysis by as much as an order of magnitude.

Precision

In absorption spectroscopy, precision is limited by indeterminate errors—primarily instrumental noise—introduced when measuring absorbance. Precision is generally worse for low absorbances where P₀ ≈ P_T, and for high absorbances when P_T approaches 0. We might expect, therefore, that precision will vary with transmittance.

We can derive an expression between precision and transmittance by applying the propagation of uncertainty as described in Chapter 4. To do so we rewrite Beer’s law asC=−1εblogT(10.22)(10.22)C=−1εblog⁡T

Table 4.10 in Chapter 4 helps us in completing the propagation of uncertainty for equation 10.22, giving the absolute uncertainty in the concentration, s_C, assC=−0.4343εb×sTT(10.23)(10.23)sC=−0.4343εb×sTT

where s_T is the absolute uncertainty in the transmittance. Dividing equation 10.23 by equation 10.22 gives the relative uncertainty in concentration, s_C/C, assCC=0.4343sTTlogT(4.8.36)(4.8.36)sCC=0.4343sTTlog⁡T

If we know the absolute uncertainty in transmittance, we can determine the relative uncertainty in concentration for any transmittance.

Determining the relative uncertainty in concentration is complicated because s_T may be a function of the transmittance. As shown in Table 10.8, three categories of indeterminate instrumental error have been observed.¹² A constant s_T is observed for the uncertainty associated with reading %T on a meter’s analog or digital scale. Typical values are ±0.2–0.3% (a k₁ of ±0.002–0.003) for an analog scale, and ±0.001% a (k₁ of ±0.000 01) for a digital scale. A constant s_T also is observed for the thermal transducers used in infrared spectrophotometers. The effect of a constant s_T on the relative uncertainty in concentration is shown by curve A in Figure 10.40. Note that the relative uncertainty is very large for both high and low absorbances, reaching a minimum when the absorbance is 0.4343. This source of indeterminate error is important for infrared spectrophotometers and for inexpensive UV/Vis spectrophotometers. To obtain a relative uncertainty in concentration of ±1–2%, the absorbance must be kept within the range 0.1–1.

Values of s_T are a complex function of transmittance when indeterminate errors are dominated by the noise associated with photon detectors. Curve B in Figure 10.40 shows that the relative uncertainty in concentration is very large for low absorbances, but is less at higher absorbances. Although the relative uncertainty reaches a minimum when the absorbance is 0.963, there is little change in the relative uncertainty for absorbances within the range 0.5–2. This source of indeterminate error generally limits the precision of high quality UV/Vis spectrophotometers for mid-to-high absorbances.

Figure 10.40 Percent relative uncertainty in concentration as a function of absorbance for the categories of indeterminate errors in Table 10.8. A: k₁ = ±0.0030; B: k₂ = ±0.0030; C:k₃ = ±0.0130. The dashed lines correspond to the minimum uncertainty for curve A (absorbance of 0.4343) and for curve B (absorbance of 0.963).

Finally, the value of s_T is directly proportional to transmittance for indeterminate errors resulting from fluctuations in the source’s intensity and from uncertainty in positioning the sample within the spectrometer. The latter is particularly important because the optical properties of any sample cell are not uniform. As a result, repositioning the sample cell may lead to a change in the intensity of transmitted radiation. As shown by curve C in Figure 10.40, the effect is only important at low absorbances. This source of indeterminate errors is usually the limiting factor for high quality UV/Vis spectrophotometers when the absorbance is relatively small.

When the relative uncertainty in concentration is limited by the %T readout resolution, the precision of the analysis can be improved by redefining 100% T and 0% T. Normally 100% T is established using a blank and 0% T is established while preventing the source’s radiation from reaching the detector. If the absorbance is too high, precision can be improved by resetting 100% T using a standard solution of the analyte whose concentration is less than that of the sample (Figure 10.41a). For a sample whose absorbance is too low, precision can be improved by redefining 0% T using a standard solution of the analyte whose concentration is greater than that of the analyte (Figure 10.41b). In this case a calibration curve is required because a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration no longer exists. Precision can be further increased by combining these two methods (Figure 10.41c). Again, a calibration curve is necessary since the relationship between absorbance and concentration is no longer linear.

Figure 10.41 Methods for improving the precision of absorption methods: (a) high-absorbance method; (b) low-absorbance method; (c) maximum precision method.

Sensitivity

The sensitivity of a molecular absorption method, which is the slope of a Beer’s law calibration curve, is the product of the analyte’s absorptivity and the pathlength of the sample cell (εb). You can improve a method’s sensitivity by selecting a wavelength where absorbance is at a maximum or by increasing the pathlength.

Note

See Figure 10.24 for an example of how the choice of wavelength affects a calibration curve’s sensitivity.

Selectivity

Selectivity is rarely a problem in molecular absorption spectrophotometry. In many cases it is possible to find a wavelength where only the analyte absorbs. When two or more species do contribute to the measured absorbance, a multicomponent analysis is still possible, as shown in Example 10.6 and Example 10.7.

Time, Cost, and Equipment

The analysis of a sample by molecular absorption spectroscopy is relatively rapid, although additional time may be required if we need to chemically convert a nonabsorbing analyte into an absorbing form. The cost of UV/Vis instrumentation ranges from several hundred dollars for a simple filter photometer, to more than $50,000 for a computer controlled high resolution, double-beam instrument equipped with variable slits, and operating over an extended range of wavelengths. Fourier transform infrared spectrometers can be obtained for as little as $15,000–$20,000, although more expensive models are available.

Contributors

David Harvey (DePauw University)