Only 10 $ per sample for interpreting of your Raman spectrum
Payment Upon Completion

Contact us...

In this course the general introduction to Raman spectroscopy and microscopy will be provided and practical tips as well as examples will be given. The capability of Raman spectroscopy for the analysis of real-life samples (paint components, clays, coating materials, etc.) taken from historical and archaeological objects will be discussed.

1. Principles of Raman spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy is widely used in the investigation of cultural heritage materials due to its high spatial resolution (typically in the range of 1 to 10 µm), large amount of obtainable information, non-destructivity and ability to perform in-situ analysis.^1,2 With Raman spectroscopy it’s possible to analyse various materials: minerals, inorganic and organic pigments, binding media, varnishes, ceramics, plastics, textile fibres etc.²

The following video explains the principles and instrumentation of Raman spectroscopy.https://www.uttv.ee/embed?id=29055

Similarly to infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy is classified as vibrational spectroscopy.³ Raman spectroscopy is based on Raman scattering (or Raman effect) that reveals the vibrational, rotational and other low frequency modes of molecules⁴. In this technique, the sample is exposed to an intense beam of monochromatic light (typically a laser beam) in the frequency range of visible, near-infrared or near-ultraviolet region.⁵ The electromagnetic radiation, interacting with a substance, can be transmitted, absorbed, or scattered⁶. When the monochromatic radiation is scattered by molecules, the majority of the radiation undergoes the common Rayleigh scattering (radiation’s  frequency/wavelength is unchanged). However, a small fraction of the scattered radiation is observed to have a slightly different frequency from that of the incident radiation. This is known as the Raman effect⁷. The Raman lines show up pairwise. The dominant Stokes lines have a lower frequency (longer wavelength) than the initial radiation, whereas the weaker (often nondetectable) anti-Stokes lines have a higher frequency (shorter wavelength).^4,5 The frequency shifts are virtually independent of the excitation wavelength and are characteristic of the particular substance/molecule. Usually one only records the relatively strong Stokes lines, which therefore are attributed a positive frequency shift. Such spectral coordinate is called the Raman shift and measured in wavenumbers (in cm^-1).⁴ See scheme in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Scheme of Raman scattering.

In Raman spectroscopy, as it is a scattering technique, samples are simply placed in the laser beam and the scattered radiation is collected and analysed⁸. Raman spectrometer measures the wavelength-dependent intensity of the inelastically scattered light.

The obtained Raman spectra are essentially vibrational spectra. Hence, if presented in the Raman shift scale, they are directly comparable to corresponding infrared absorption spectra (see Figure 2). However, Raman spectrum arises in a different manner and the rules, which vibrations are Raman-active (and thus produce signals in the spectrum), are different. It turns out that a vibration is Raman-active (i.e. revealed as a spectral line in the Raman spectrum), if the polarizability of the molecule changes during the vibration.⁷ It often happens that vibrations that are active (or give high-intensity signals) in Raman scattering are inactive (or give low-intensity signals) in the infrared, and vice versa.⁷Therefore, Raman spectra often provide complementary information to IR spectra.

Figure 2. Raman (laser 514.5 nm) and IR spectra of benzene.

1.1. Instrumentation

There are two types of Raman spectrometers: dispersive spectrometers (based on the use of diffraction grating) and interferometer containing Fourier-transform Raman spectrometers (FT-Raman)⁹.

In general the main components of Raman spectrometers are presented on the following scheme:

In Raman spectroscopy, the choice of excitation wavelength and intensity is very important. Different wavelengths are suitable for the analysis of different types of material. The wavelength will affect the Raman intensity, spatial resolution, background fluorescence, and potential damage to the sample. Almost exclusively lasers are used as excitation sources, because they are highly monochromatic, give high-intensity radiation and can be efficiently focused due to their high coherence. Only continuous wave (CW) lasers are used, as pulsed lasers easily damage the sample. Some popular CW lasers are presented in Table 1. Traditionally, laser wavelengths up to 830 nm have been used in dispersive instruments while the 1064 nm laser line has been employed in FT-Raman setups. With the availability of sensitive InGaAs array detectors, it has become meaningful to use also the 1064 nm lasers with dispersive Raman instruments.

Table 1. Laser sources for Raman spectroscopy.

Raman scattering efficiency decreases with increasing excitation wavelength as λ⁻⁴. However, short-wavelength lasers more easily induce fluorescence, absorb in the sample or cause other undesirable effects due to their high photon energy. Hence, most common laser wavelengths in Raman spectroscopy are in the visible and NIR region (such as 633 or 785 nm) which offer low fluorescence whilst retaining relatively high Raman intensity. For samples which exhibit fluorescence even under red excitation (for example dyes), the 1064 nm laser may be needed. While near-infrared lasers have a smaller photon energy, compared to visible lasers, they are usually more powerful, in order to compensate for the reduced Raman scattering efficiency. Therefore, they may still damage the sample. It is especially important for strongly absorbing (black) samples, in which case the UV/visible lasers (operating at lower intensities) may yield a stronger Raman signal.

Dispersive Raman spectrometers

A dispersive spectrometer utilizes a diffraction grating to angularly disperse the light. As a result, at the detector plane, different wavelengths become spatially separated. Nevertheless, prior to entering the spectrometer, the incoming light should go through a special edge or notch filter to suppress the primary (Raman-scattered) light and thereby reduce the scattering inside the spectrometer. A matrix detector is used to record the dispersed spectrum. Typically, a silicon-based cooled CCD is used, which is very sensitive in the visible and NIR region (up to 1100 nm).

FT-Raman spectrometers

Commercial FT-Raman spectrometers were introduced in the late 1980s¹⁰. Their operating principle is similar to that of FTIR spectrometers and is based on an interferometer. As the Raman-scattered light enters the instrument, the interferometer selectively modulates the individual spectral components by systematically changing an optical path length difference. The resulting beam of light is recorded by a point detector. FT-Raman is superior to a dispersive instrument in the near-IR region beyond 1000 nm. Commonly, the 1064 nm laser excitation along with germanium or indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) detector is used. They also offer excellent wavelength accuracy and can potentially combine IR absorption and Raman measurement capacity in single instrument. However, FT-Raman frequently needs to use high laser intensities due to the reduced Raman scattering efficiency at longer wavelengths, which may damage the sample.

Different types of Raman Spectroscopy

A variety of Raman instruments and special techniques are used for the analysis of cultural heritage materials. The choice of instrument determines the sensitivity, spectral range and resolution, spatial resolution, availability of different excitation sources, and convenience of operation. 

• Micro-Raman spectrometer (or Raman microscope) is the most common bench-top Raman instrument. A high-resolution spectrometer (either dispersive or FT) and one or several laser sources are coupled through an optical microscope. The excitation beam is focused and the secondary emission is collected simultaneously by the microscope objective in backscattering geometry. A high-numerical aperture (NA) objective yields both a high spatial resolution and a high collection efficiency.
• Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) involves inelastic light scattering by molecules placed close to nanometal surfaces, which amplify the scattering by plasmonic resonance. One approach is to study molecules adsorbed onto corrugated metal surfaces such as silver or gold nanoparticles¹¹. Another approach is to stimulate the molecules by a sharp metal tip. Such tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy is typically implemented by combining a confocal microscope and a scanning probe microscope. 
• In Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) the incident photon energy is close in energy to an electronic transition of a compound or material under examination. 
• In a portable Raman spectrometer, a miniature dispersive spectrometer and a small laser source are integrated into a portable, hand-held device. Hence, the instrument can be used to perform in situ analysis in museums, archives, also outdoors on archaeological sites for the analysis of mural or cave paintings. Such portable devices frequently employ a fiber-optic probes. 

1.2. Problems with Raman spectroscopy

Compared to IR absorption, the primary disadvantage of Raman spectroscopy is the fluorescent background (see Figure 3). As Raman scattering is inherently weak, one has to use an intense laser beam for excitation, and for many materials, this results in a strong fluorescence – either due to the material itself of impurities. Sometimes even trace impurities – if they are strongly fluorescent – can lead to disturbing fluorescence background. Fortunately, Raman lines are spectrally close to the laser beam whereas fluorescence has typically a large Stokes shift. 

Figure 3. Example of the fluorescence in the Raman spectrum of red lead containing paint.

Relative to the Raman signal, the fluorescent background can be highly intense and even the tail of the fluorescence band may obscure the Raman spectrum. Although the problem can be partially resolved by careful sample preparation, time resolved spectroscopy or coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS), there will always be experiments that remain difficult to perform.⁷

In addition to fluorescence, intense focused laser irradiation can cause heating and degradation of the sample. The problems are typical for organic, soft, photosensitive or dark/coloured materials whereas transparent inorganic materials have usually quite high damage threshold.

2. Analysis with Raman spectroscopy

In the following video Senior Research Fellow Dr. Valter Kiisk demonstrates and explains how to perform measurements with a typical micro-Raman spectrometer.https://www.uttv.ee/embed?id=29396

Identification of the composition of the studied material is often based on the comparison of its Raman spectrum with a spectral library of reference materials.¹² Different papers and books have been published from where Raman spectra or information about excitation wavelengths and list of wavenumbers in the Raman spectra are available ^5,13,14. Also a very valuable on-line database is made available by the Infrared & Raman Users Group (IRUG)– http://irug.org/ – from where different Raman (and also IR) spectra of cultural heritage materials can be obtained free of charge.

Only 15$ per sample for interpreting of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is an incredibly powerful tool for characterizing molecular structures. When submitting to the FDA or other regulatory agencies, full structural characterization by NMR provides crucial evidence of compound identity. A combination of 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional NMR experiments are necessary for complete confidence in chemical structure.

This post will walk you through the steps to fully characterize a molecule by 1- and 2-dimensional NMR, including on how to perform NMR interpretation.

Step 1: ¹H-NMR

The first step in structural characterization is 1-dimensional proton ¹H-NMR. The chemical shift, multiplicity, coupling constants, and integration are all factors to consider when assigning protons. In this example, only three protons can be assigned by the proton spectrum alone: protons 3, 4, and 6.

To begin, let’s start with proton 3. Proton 3 is the only methyl group in the structure, and therefore must integrate to 3 protons. The only peak with an integration of 3 is the doublet at 1.770 ppm. The high field chemical shift supports this assignment. The peak is split into a doublet with a coupling constant of 1.2 Hz, reflecting the long-range coupling between protons 3 and 4, which also supports this assignment.

Protons that are coupled to each other should exhibit the same coupling constant. The long-range coupling constant observed for proton 3 (J=1.2 Hz, split into a doublet by proton 4) is reflected in the coupling constant for proton 4 (J=1.2 Hz, split into a quartet by proton 3). Therefore, the peak at 7.690 ppm must represent proton 4! The integration and chemical shift support the assignment, as proton 4 is the only aromatic proton in the structure.

There is only one singlet in the ¹H-NMR spectrum. The only proton that should show up as a singlet is proton 6, as it has no neighboring protons that would split the peak (the nearest proton is 5 bonds away!). The chemical shift of 11.256 ppm supports this assignment, as imide protons often show up far downfield. The peak also integrates to 1 proton, supporting the assignment.

The remaining protons are doublets, triplets, and multiplets that can be assigned by 2-dimensional COSY.

Step 2: ¹H-¹H COSY

¹H-¹H Correlation Spectroscopy (COSY) shows the correlation between hydrogens which are coupled to each other in the ¹H NMR spectrum. The ¹H spectrum is plotted on both 2D axes. While 2-bond and 3-bond ¹H-¹H coupling is easily visible by COSY, long range coupling can also be observed with long acquisition times. The cross-peaks (not on the diagonal) that are symmetric to the diagonal show the COSY correlations. For example, protons 3 and 4 are coupled to each other, since they form a box pattern symmetric to the diagonal. This confirms assignments 3 and 4 made from the proton spectrum alone.

Two types of COSY coupling: 3-bond short range coupling between protons 7 and 8 (red) and 4-bond long range coupling between protons 3 and 4 (blue).

My favorite way to analyze a COSY spectrum with many unassigned protons is to make a table of correlations, like the one seen here. Look at the table for any clear differences in correlation and begin there! In this example, all unassigned protons show one or two COSY correlations-except the proton at 4.233 ppm, which correlates to threeother protons by COSY. The only proton expected to correlate with three nonequivalent protons is proton 9!

Now that proton 9 has been assigned, the fun really begins. Thymidine’s structure suggests that proton 9 should couple protons 8, 10, and 11. Based on the COSY, proton 9 couples protons at 2.068 ppm (2H), 3.754 ppm (1H), and 5.209 ppm (1H). From this list, we can easily assign proton 8 as the peak at 2.068 ppm based on its integration of 2 protons. To differentiate protons 10 and 11, take a look at our COSY table; 3.754 ppm shows two COSY correlations, while 5.209 ppm only shows one. Therefore, we can assign proton 10 as 5.209 ppm and proton 11 as 3.754 ppm.

Once proton 8 has been assigned, we can easily assign proton 7 based on the remaining COSY correlation for proton 8. Proton 7’s peak at 6.163 ppm is split into a triplet by the two 8 protons, confirming the assignment.

All that remains are protons 12 and 13. We can assign proton 12 (3.564 ppm) based on its integration of 2H and its COSY correlation to proton 11. The last remaining peak at 4.999 ppm must be proton 13; this is confirmed by COSY correlation with proton 12, triplet multiplicity based on splitting by proton 12, and integration of one proton.

Now we have a fully assigned ¹H-NMR spectrum! This spectrum will help us assign our carbons using HSQC and HMBC NMR spectroscopy.

Step 3: ¹³C-NMR

Carbon NMR is a necessary step in full structural characterization. However, ¹³C-NMR alone does not provide enough information to assign the carbons in the molecule. The NMR spectrum below does confirm the number of carbons in the molecule; however, HSQC and HMBC (we will get to these soon!) are necessary to assign the carbons with confidence. Note that one of the carbons is hidden beneath the solvent signal but is clearly visible after zooming into that region.

Step 4: DEPT-45, 90, and 135

Distortionless Enhancement of Polarization Transfer (DEPT) experiments help assign carbon peaks by determining the number of protons attached to each carbon. For very simple molecules, DEPT may be enough to partially or fully assign all carbons. In complex molecules, DEPT and HSQC together are useful for confirming both carbon and proton assignments. For example, the DEPT experiments below can only identify carbon 3-it is the only CH₃ peak. I always go back and use DEPT to confirm the carbons I assigned by HSQC.

• DEPT-45 shows CH, CH₂, and CH₃ carbons as positive peaks. Carbons with no protons are not visible.
• DEPT-90 shows only CH peaks as positive peaks. Carbons with no protons, CH₂, and CH₃ carbons are not visible.
• DEPT-135 shows CH and CH₃ carbons as positive peaks and CH₂ carbons as negative peaks. Carbons with no protons are not visible.

Step 5: ¹H-¹³C HSQC

¹H-¹³C Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence Spectroscopy (HSQC) shows which hydrogens are directly attached to which carbon atoms. The ¹H spectrum is shown on the horizontal axis and the ¹³C spectrum is shown on the vertical axis. The HSQC spectrum is most valuable when protons have already been assigned.

For example, HSQC shows a correlation between proton 4 and the carbon at 136.113 ppm; this carbon is now assigned as carbon 4. Carbons 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12 are assigned by HSQC. Only 1-bond correlations are observed, so HSQC assignments are relatively straightforward. The DEPT experiments also confirm these assignments. HSQC is also useful in confirming proton assignments of nitrogen or oxygen-bound protons; they show no signal by HSQC. This further supports the assignments of protons 6, 10, and 13.

An example correlation between proton and carbon 4 is observed by HSQC.

Step 6: ¹H-¹³C HMBC

¹H-¹³C Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation Spectroscopy (HMBC) shows the correlations between protons and carbons that are separated by multiple bonds. The ¹H spectrum is shown on the horizontal axis and the ¹³C spectrum is shown on the vertical axis. Correlated atoms are shown in blue and the connecting atoms are shown in red. Note that direct hydrogen-carbon bonds (1-bond correlations) are generally not seen. For example, hydrogen 4 shows correlations with carbons 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7, but not carbon 4.

HMBC interactions between proton 4 and carbons 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.

HMBC is incredibly useful for assigning carbons that have no protons attached. In this example, carbons 1, 2, and 5 have no protons attached. Carbon 1 is assigned by HMBC interactions with protons 3, 4, and 6; carbon 2 by interaction with protons 3, 4, 6, and 7; and carbon 5 by interactions with protons 4 and 7 only. The chemical environment of carbon 5 suggests it would appear more downfield than carbon 1, which confirms these assignments.

HMBC also confirms assignments that were based solely on the proton and COSY spectrum. For example, protons 10 and 13 are differentiated by HMBC; proton 10 is confirmed by interactions with carbons 8, 9, and 11, while proton 13 is confirmed by interactions with 11 and 12. HMBC supports all proton and all carbon assignments, unambiguously confirming both the structure and analysis of thymidine.

At Emery Pharma, we are experts in 1D and 2D NMR characterization and structure elucidation; in fact, 2D NMR projects are some of our favorites! We have supported numerous pharmaceutical companies in full NMR characterization for API submissions to regulatory agencies, as well as complete structure elucidation of impurities. We provide a fully annotated report with images similar to those seen here and support our results with high resolution mass spectrometry and elemental analysis. 

Some nuclei rotate around their axis like electrons. In the presence of an external magnetic field, a rotating nucleus has only a small number of stable orientations. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) occurs when a spinning core is excited from a lower energy orientation to a higher energy orientation in the presence of a magnetic field by absorbing enough electromagnetic radiation. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy involves measuring the amount of energy required to change spin nuclei from a stable orientation to a more unstable orientation in a magnetic field. Because spin-core nuclei change direction in a magnetic field at different frequencies, different frequencies of absorbing radiation are needed to change the orientation of spin-core nuclei. The frequency at which the absorption takes place is used for analysis and spectroscopy [1].

Nuclear magnetic resonance was first discovered independently in 1946 by Felix Bloch of Stanford University and Edward Parcel of Harvard University. They were able to show the absorption of electromagnetic radiation as a result of the transfer of the energy level of the nucleus in a strong magnetic field. The two physicists won the Nobel Prize in 1952 for their work. In the first five years after the discovery of the nuclear magnetic resonance method, chemists discovered that the molecular environment of objects affects the absorption of radiation by nuclei in the presence of a magnetic field, and this effect could be related to the structure of the molecule. Since then, the growth of magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been explosive and this method has had a significant effect on the development of organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry and biochemistry [2]. In 1999, a team of Canadian physicists developed a new method using the Beta Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Method, which is capable of demonstrating the magnetic and electrical properties of very thin layers and surfaces. BetaNMR methods are used in nanoscience. Be [3].

The magnitude of the spin angle motion in the nuclei is determined by the quantum number of the nucleus spin. Quantum number The core spin of any number can be integer or semi-integer. In 16 O and 12C non-spin nuclei, the quantum spin number of the nucleus is zero. Cores that are not spin and therefore do not have the magnitude of the spin angle motion can not be detected by NMR spectroscopy. Spin-core cores with spherical charge distribution have a spin quantum number of 1/2. Examples of these nuclei include 13C, 19F, 3H, 15N, 31P and 1H, which have a quantum number of 1/2 and a magnetic moment. In order for a nucleus in a magnetic field to absorb a large amount of electromagnetic radiation, it must have a high frequency in the sample and also have a relatively large magnetic moment (µ). Cores that have both properties in question include 1H, 19F, 21P. Most NMR measurements are usually performed for 1 h. Measurements of other nuclei are often performed using signal amplification methods to observe the spectrum. Usually, among the nuclei with low relative frequency that show the magnetic resonance of the nucleus, 12 C, 15N, 16O are the most important for chemists. The magnetic resonance method of the hydrogen nucleus (1H), which is used more than other nuclei, has a magnetic torque of about 79.2 برای. It will be magnetic. For other cores used for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, the magnetic torque for 21P, 19F 12C is 6873.2, 1305.1 and 0.7022, respectively [4]. In most cases, the sensitivity of non-proton core magnetic resonance devices, such as 12C, etc., is lower than that of HNMR. Also, in most compounds, the natural abundance of non-proton magnetic nuclei is significantly lower than that of protons. This factor causes the NMR spectra of non-proton nuclei to have a relatively low noise signal. The peaks of these spectra are small, and often the spectrum cannot be determined if the same device used for proton nucleus (PMR) NMR is used. Due to the low signal-to-noise ratio in these cases, most devices designed to record the NMR spectra of non-proton nuclei use multiple traverses with signal averaging techniques. The most common devices for spectral peak extraction use the Fourier transform. Fourier transformers are also used to prepare PMR spectra of dilute solutions and complex molecules, such as proteins, in which the amount of a particular proton in the molecule is small. The difference between PMR spectra and other NMR spectra is in the range of chemical displacement. The chemical displacement range for PMR is 10PPM in most cases. While for the 12C core the chemical displacement is up to about 200PPM, for the 19F and 21P spectra it is 300 and 400PPM, respectively. In NMR methods, the units used are usually time (seconds), angle (degrees or radians), temperature (Kelvin), magnetic field strength (Tesla, T), energy (joules), vibration (rpm) and power ( Watts) is. [5] Components of the NMR Device The important components of an NMR spectrometer are shown schematically in Figure (1). A brief description of each component is given below.

Only 15$ per sample for interpreting of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Over the past fifty years nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, commonly referred to as nmr, has become the preeminent technique for determining the structure of organic compounds. Of all the spectroscopic methods, it is the only one for which a complete analysis and interpretation of the entire spectrum is normally expected. Although larger amounts of sample are needed than for mass spectroscopy, nmr is non-destructive, and with modern instruments good data may be obtained from samples weighing less than a milligram. To be successful in using nmr as an analytical tool, it is necessary to understand the physical principles on which the methods are based.

The nuclei of many elemental isotopes have a characteristic spin (I). Some nuclei have integral spins (e.g. I = 1, 2, 3 ….), some have fractional spins (e.g. I = 1/2, 3/2, 5/2 ….), and a few have no spin, I = 0 (e.g. ¹²C, ¹⁶O, ³²S, ….). Isotopes of particular interest and use to organic chemists are ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁹F and ³¹P, all of which have I = 1/2. Since the analysis of this spin state is fairly straightforward, our discussion of nmr will be limited to these and other I = 1/2 nuclei.

The following features lead to the nmr phenomenon:

1. A spinning charge generates a magnetic field, as shown by the animation on the right. The resulting spin-magnet has a magnetic moment (μ) proportional to the spin.
2. In the presence of an external magnetic field (B0), two spin states exist, +1/2 and -1/2. The magnetic moment of the lower energy +1/2 state is aligned with the external field, but that of the higher energy -1/2 spin state is opposed to the external field. Note that the arrow representing the external field points North.
3. The difference in energy between the two spin states is dependent on the external magnetic field strength, and is always very small. The following diagram illustrates that the two spin states have the same energy when the external field is zero, but diverge as the field increases. At a field equal to Bx a formula for the energy difference is given (remember I = 1/2 and μ is the magnetic moment of the nucleus in the field).
Strong magnetic fields are necessary for nmr spectroscopy. The international unit for magnetic flux is the tesla (T). The earth’s magnetic field is not constant, but is approximately 10-4 T at ground level. Modern nmr spectrometers use powerful magnets having fields of 1 to 20 T. Even with these high fields, the energy difference between the two spin states is less than 0.1 cal/mole. To put this in perspective, recall that infrared transitions involve 1 to 10 kcal/mole and electronic transitions are nearly 100 time greater. For nmr purposes, this small energy difference (ΔE) is usually given as a frequency in units of MHz (106 Hz), ranging from 20 to 900 Mz, depending on the magnetic field strength and the specific nucleus being studied. Irradiation of a sample with radio frequency (rf) energy corresponding exactly to the spin state separation of a specific set of nuclei will cause excitation of those nuclei in the +1/2 state to the higher -1/2 spin state. Note that this electromagnetic radiation falls in the radio and television broadcast spectrum. Nmr spectroscopy is therefore the energetically mildest probe used to examine the structure of molecules.  The nucleus of a hydrogen atom (the proton) has a magnetic moment μ = 2.7927, and has been studied more than any other nucleus. The previous diagram may be changed to display energy differences for the proton spin states (as frequencies) by mouse clicking anywhere within it.
4. For spin 1/2 nuclei the energy difference between the two spin states at a given magnetic field strength will be proportional to their magnetic moments. For the four common nuclei noted above, the magnetic moments are: 1H μ = 2.7927, 19F μ = 2.6273, 31P μ = 1.1305 & 13C μ = 0.7022. These moments are in nuclear magnetons, which are 5.05078•10-27 JT-1. The following diagram gives the approximate frequencies that correspond to the spin state energy separations for each of these nuclei in an external magnetic field of 2.35 T. The formula in the colored box shows the direct correlation of frequency (energy difference) with magnetic moment (h = Planck’s constant = 6.626069•10-34 Js).

      2. Proton NMR Spectroscopy
This important and well-established application of nuclear magnetic resonance will serve to illustrate some of the novel aspects of this method. To begin with, the nmr spectrometer must be tuned to a specific nucleus, in this case the proton. The actual procedure for obtaining the spectrum varies, but the simplest is referred to as the continuous wave (CW) method. A typical CW-spectrometer is shown in the following diagram. A solution of the sample in a uniform 5 mm glass tube is oriented between the poles of a powerful magnet, and is spun to average any magnetic field variations, as well as tube imperfections. Radio frequency radiation of appropriate energy is broadcast into the sample from an antenna coil (colored red). A receiver coil surrounds the sample tube, and emission of absorbed rf energy is monitored by dedicated electronic devices and a computer. An nmr spectrum is acquired by varying or sweeping the magnetic field over a small range while observing the rf signal from the sample. An equally effective technique is to vary the frequency of the rf radiation while holding the external field constant.

As an example, consider a sample of water in a 2.3487 T external magnetic field, irradiated by 100 MHz radiation. If the magnetic field is smoothly increased to 2.3488 T, the hydrogen nuclei of the water molecules will at some point absorb rf energy and a resonance signal will appear. An animation showing this may be activated by clicking the Show Field Sweep button. The field sweep will be repeated three times, and the resulting resonance trace is colored red. For visibility, the water proton signal displayed in the animation is much broader than it would be in an actual experiment.

Since protons all have the same magnetic moment, we might expect all hydrogen atoms to give resonance signals at the same field / frequency values. Fortunately for chemistry applications, this is not true. By clicking the Show Different Protons button under the diagram, a number of representative proton signals will be displayed over the same magnetic field range. It is not possible, of course, to examine isolated protons in the spectrometer described above; but from independent measurement and calculation it has been determined that a naked proton would resonate at a lower field strength than the nuclei of covalently bonded hydrogens. With the exception of water, chloroform and sulfuric acid, which are examined as liquids, all the other compounds are measured as gases.

Why should the proton nuclei in different compounds behave differently in the nmr experiment ? 
The answer to this question lies with the electron(s) surrounding the proton in covalent compounds and ions. Since electrons are charged particles, they move in response to the external magnetic field (B_o) so as to generate a secondary field that opposes the much stronger applied field. This secondary field shields the nucleus from the applied field, so B_o must be increased in order to achieve resonance (absorption of rf energy). As illustrated in the drawing on the right, B_o must be increased to compensate for the induced shielding field. In the upper diagram, those compounds that give resonance signals at the higher field side of the diagram (CH₄, HCl, HBr and HI) have proton nuclei that are more shielded than those on the lower field (left) side of the diagram. 
The magnetic field range displayed in the above diagram is very small compared with the actual field strength (only about 0.0042%). It is customary to refer to small increments such as this in units of parts per million (ppm). The difference between 2.3487 T and 2.3488 T is therefore about 42 ppm. Instead of designating a range of nmr signals in terms of magnetic field differences (as above), it is more common to use a frequency scale, even though the spectrometer may operate by sweeping the magnetic field. Using this terminology, we would find that at 2.34 T the proton signals shown above extend over a 4,200 Hz range (for a 100 MHz rf frequency, 42 ppm is 4,200 Hz). Most organic compounds exhibit proton resonances that fall within a 12 ppm range (the shaded area), and it is therefore necessary to use very sensitive and precise spectrometers to resolve structurally distinct sets of hydrogen atoms within this narrow range. In this respect it might be noted that the detection of a part-per-million difference is equivalent to detecting a 1 millimeter difference in distances of 1 kilometer.

Chemical Shift

Unlike infrared and uv-visible spectroscopy, where absorption peaks are uniquely located by a frequency or wavelength, the location of different nmr resonance signals is dependent on both the external magnetic field strength and the rf frequency. Since no two magnets will have exactly the same field, resonance frequencies will vary accordingly and an alternative method for characterizing and specifying the location of nmr signals is needed. This problem is illustrated by the eleven different compounds shown in the following diagram. Although the eleven resonance signals are distinct and well separated, an unambiguous numerical locator cannot be directly assigned to each.

One method of solving this problem is to report the location of an nmr signal in a spectrum relative to a reference signal from a standard compound added to the sample. Such a reference standard should be chemically unreactive, and easily removed from the sample after the measurement. Also, it should give a single sharp nmr signal that does not interfere with the resonances normally observed for organic compounds. Tetramethylsilane, (CH₃)₄Si, usually referred to as TMS, meets all these characteristics, and has become the reference compound of choice for proton and carbon nmr.
Since the separation (or dispersion) of nmr signals is magnetic field dependent, one additional step must be taken in order to provide an unambiguous location unit. This is illustrated for the acetone, methylene chloride and benzene signals by clicking on the previous diagram. To correct these frequency differences for their field dependence, we divide them by the spectrometer frequency (100 or 500 MHz in the example), as shown in a new display by again clicking on the diagram. The resulting number would be very small, since we are dividing Hz by MHz, so it is multiplied by a million, as shown by the formula in the blue shaded box. Note that ν_ref is the resonant frequency of the reference signal and ν_samp is the frequency of the sample signal. This operation gives a locator number called the Chemical Shift, having units of parts-per-million (ppm), and designated by the symbol δ   Chemical shifts for all the compounds in the original display will be presented by a third click on the diagram.

The compounds referred to above share two common characteristics:

• The hydrogen atoms in a given molecule are all structurally equivalent, averaged for fast conformational equilibria. 
• The compounds are all liquids, save for neopentane which boils at 9 °C and is a liquid in an ice bath.

The first feature assures that each compound gives a single sharp resonance signal. The second allows the pure (neat) substance to be poured into a sample tube and examined in a nmr spectrometer. In order to take the nmr spectra of a solid, it is usually necessary to dissolve it in a suitable solvent. Early studies used carbon tetrachloride for this purpose, since it has no hydrogen that could introduce an interfering signal. Unfortunately, CCl₄ is a poor solvent for many polar compounds and is also toxic. Deuterium labeled compounds, such as deuterium oxide (D₂O), chloroform-d (DCCl₃), benzene-d₆(C₆D₆), acetone-d₆ (CD₃COCD₃) and DMSO-d₆ (CD₃SOCD₃) are now widely used as nmr solvents. Since the deuterium isotope of hydrogen has a different magnetic moment and spin, it is invisible in a spectrometer tuned to protons.

From the previous discussion and examples we may deduce that one factor contributing to chemical shift differences in proton resonance is the inductive effect. If the electron density about a proton nucleus is relatively high, the induced field due to electron motions will be stronger than if the electron density is relatively low. The shielding effect in such high electron density cases will therefore be larger, and a higher external field (B_o) will be needed for the rf energy to excite the nuclear spin. Since silicon is less electronegative than carbon, the electron density about the methyl hydrogens in tetramethylsilane is expected to be greater than the electron density about the methyl hydrogens in neopentane (2,2-dimethylpropane), and the characteristic resonance signal from the silane derivative does indeed lie at a higher magnetic field. Such nuclei are said to be shielded. Elements that are more electronegative than carbon should exert an opposite effect (reduce the electron density); and, as the data in the following tables show, methyl groups bonded to such elements display lower field signals (they are deshielded). The deshielding effect of electron withdrawing groups is roughly proportional to their electronegativity, as shown by the left table. Furthermore, if more than one such group is present, the deshielding is additive (table on the right), and proton resonance is shifted even further downfield.

The general distribution of proton chemical shifts associated with different functional groups is summarized in the following chart. Bear in mind that these ranges are approximate, and may not encompass all compounds of a given class. Note also that the ranges specified for OH and NH protons (colored orange) are wider than those for most CH protons. This is due to hydrogen bonding variations at different sample concentrations.

Proton Chemical Shift Ranges*
Low Field Region		High Field Region
	* For samples in CDCl3 solution. The δ scale is relative to TMS at δ = 0.

To make use of a calculator that predicts aliphatic proton chemical shifts Click Here. This application was developed at Colby College.

Signal Strength

The magnitude or intensity of nmr resonance signals is displayed along the vertical axis of a spectrum, and is proportional to the molar concentration of the sample. Thus, a small or dilute sample will give a weak signal, and doubling or tripling the sample concentration increases the signal strength proportionally. If we take the nmr spectrum of equal molar amounts of benzene and cyclohexane in carbon tetrachloride solution, the resonance signal from cyclohexane will be twice as intense as that from benzene because cyclohexane has twice as many hydrogens per molecule. This is an important relationship when samples incorporating two or more different sets of hydrogen atoms are examined, since it allows the ratio of hydrogen atoms in each distinct set to be determined. To this end it is necessary to measure the relative strength as well as the chemical shift of the resonance signals that comprise an nmr spectrum. Two common methods of displaying the integrated intensities associated with a spectrum are illustrated by the following examples. In the three spectra in the top row, a horizontal integrator trace (light green) rises as it crosses each signal by a distance proportional to the signal strength. Alternatively, an arbitrary number, selected by the instrument’s computer to reflect the signal strength, is printed below each resonance peak, as shown in the three spectra in the lower row. From the relative intensities shown here, together with the previously noted chemical shift correlations, the reader should be able to assign the signals in these spectra to the set of hydrogens that generates each. If you click on one of the spectrum signals (colored red) or on hydrogen atom(s) in the structural formulas the spectrum will be enlarged and the relationship will be colored blue.
Hint: When evaluating relative signal strengths, it is useful to set the smallest integration to unity and convert the other values proportionally.

Hydroxyl Proton Exchange and the Influence of Hydrogen Bonding

The last two compounds in the lower row are alcohols. The OH proton signal is seen at 2.37 δ in 2-methyl-3-butyne-2-ol, and at 3.87 δ in 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone, illustrating the wide range over which this chemical shift may be found. A six-membered ring intramolecular hydrogen bond in the latter compound is in part responsible for its low field shift, and will be shown by clicking on the hydroxyl proton. We can take advantage of rapid OH exchange with the deuterium of heavy water to assign hydroxyl proton resonance signals . As shown in the following equation, this removes the hydroxyl proton from the sample and its resonance signal in the nmr spectrum disappears. Experimentally, one simply adds a drop of heavy water to a chloroform-d solution of the compound and runs the spectrum again. The result of this exchange is displayed below.

R-O-H   +   D2O      R-O-D   +   D-O-H

Hydrogen bonding shifts the resonance signal of a proton to lower field ( higher frequency ). Numerous experimental observations support this statement, and a few of these will be described here.

i)   The chemical shift of the hydroxyl hydrogen of an alcohol varies with concentration. Very dilute solutions of 2-methyl-2-propanol, (CH3)3COH, in carbon tetrachloride solution display a hydroxyl resonance signal having a relatively high-field chemical shift (< 1.0 δ ). In concentrated solution this signal shifts to a lower field, usually near 2.5 δ.
ii)   The more acidic hydroxyl group of phenol generates a lower-field resonance signal, which shows a similar concentration dependence to that of alcohols. OH resonance signals for different percent concentrations of phenol in chloroform-d are shown in the following diagram (C-H signals are not shown).
iii)   Because of their favored hydrogen-bonded dimeric association, the hydroxyl proton of carboxylic acids displays a resonance signal significantly down-field of other functions. For a typical acid it appears from 10.0 to 13.0 δ and is often broader than other signals. The spectra shown below for chloroacetic acid (left) and 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid (right) are examples.
iv)   Intramolecular hydrogen bonds, especially those defining a six-membered ring, generally display a very low-field proton resonance. The case of 4-hydroxypent-3-ene-2-one (the enol tautomer of 2,4-pentanedione) not only illustrates this characteristic, but also provides an instructive example of the sensitivity of the nmr experiment to dynamic change. In the nmr spectrum of the pure liquid, sharp signals from both the keto and enol tautomers are seen, their mole ratio being 4 : 21 (keto tautomer signals are colored purple). Chemical shift assignments for these signals are shown in the shaded box above the spectrum. The chemical shift of the hydrogen-bonded hydroxyl proton is δ 14.5, exceptionally downfield. We conclude, therefore, that the rate at which these tautomers interconvert is slow compared with the inherent time scale of nmr spectroscopy.
Two structurally equivalent structures may be drawn for the enol tautomer (in magenta brackets). If these enols were slow to interconvert, we would expect to see two methyl resonance signals associated with each, one from the allylic methyl and one from the methyl ketone. Since only one strong methyl signal is observed, we must conclude that the interconversion of the enols is very fast-so fast that the nmr experiment detects only a single time-averaged methyl group (50% α-keto and 50% allyl).

Although hydroxyl protons have been the focus of this discussion, it should be noted that corresponding N-H groups in amines and amides also exhibit hydrogen bonding nmr shifts, although to a lesser degree. Furthermore, OH and NH groups can undergo rapid proton exchange with each other; so if two or more such groups are present in a molecule, the nmr spectrum will show a single signal at an average chemical shift. For example, 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoic acid, (CH₃)₂C(OH)CO₂H, displays a strong methyl signal at δ 1.5 and a 1/3 weaker and broader OH signal at δ 7.3 ppm. Note that the average of the expected carboxylic acid signal (ca. 12 ) and the alcohol signal (ca. 2 ) is 7. Rapid exchange of these hydrogens with heavy water, as noted above, would cause the low field signal to disappear.

π-Electron Functions

An examination of the proton chemical shift chart (above) makes it clear that the inductive effect of substituents cannot account for all the differences in proton signals. In particular the low field resonance of hydrogens bonded to double bond or aromatic ring carbons is puzzling, as is the very low field signal from aldehyde hydrogens. The hydrogen atom of a terminal alkyne, in contrast, appears at a relatively higher field. All these anomalous cases seem to involve hydrogens bonded to pi-electron systems, and an explanation may be found in the way these pi-electrons interact with the applied magnetic field.
Pi-electrons are more polarizable than are sigma-bond electrons, as addition reactions of electrophilic reagents to alkenes testify. Therefore, we should not be surprised to find that field induced pi-electron movement produces strong secondary fields that perturb nearby nuclei. The pi-electrons associated with a benzene ring provide a striking example of this phenomenon, as shown below. The electron cloud above and below the plane of the ring circulates in reaction to the external field so as to generate an opposing field at the center of the ring and a supporting field at the edge of the ring. This kind of spatial variation is called anisotropy, and it is common to nonspherical distributions of electrons, as are found in all the functions mentioned above. Regions in which the induced field supports or adds to the external field are said to be deshielded, because a slightly weaker external field will bring about resonance for nuclei in such areas. However, regions in which the induced field opposes the external field are termed shielded because an increase in the applied field is needed for resonance. Shielded regions are designated by a plus sign, and deshielded regions by a negative sign. 
The anisotropy of some important unsaturated functions will be displayed by clicking on the benzene diagram below. Note that the anisotropy about the triple bond nicely accounts for the relatively high field chemical shift of ethynyl hydrogens. The shielding & deshielding regions about the carbonyl group have been described in two ways, which alternate in the display.

Sigma bonding electrons also have a less pronounced, but observable, anisotropic influence on nearby nuclei. This is seen in the small deshielding shift that occurs in the series CH₃–R, R–CH₂–R, R₃CH; as well as the deshielding of equatorial versus axial protons on a fixed cyclohexane ring.

Solvent Effects

Chloroform-d (CDCl₃) is the most common solvent for nmr measurements, thanks to its good solubilizing character and relative unreactive nature ( except for 1º and 2º-amines). As noted earlier, other deuterium labeled compounds, such as deuterium oxide (D₂O), benzene-d6 (C₆D₆), acetone-d6 (CD₃COCD₃) and DMSO-d6 (CD₃SOCD₃) are also available for use as nmr solvents. Because some of these solvents have π-electron functions and/or may serve as hydrogen bonding partners, the chemical shifts of different groups of protons may change depending on the solvent being used. The following table gives a few examples, obtained with dilute solutions at 300 MHz.

For most of the above resonance signals and solvents the changes are minor, being on the order of ±0.1 ppm. However, two cases result in more extreme changes and these have provided useful applications in structure determination. First, spectra taken in benzene-d₆ generally show small upfield shifts of most C–H signals, but in the case of acetone this shift is about five times larger than normal. Further study has shown that carbonyl groups form weak π–π collision complexes with benzene rings, that persist long enough to exert a significant shielding influence on nearby groups. In the case of substituted cyclohexanones, axial α-methyl groups are shifted upfield by 0.2 to 0.3 ppm; whereas equatorial methyls are slightly deshielded (shift downfield by about 0.05 ppm). These changes are all relative to the corresponding chloroform spectra.
The second noteworthy change is seen in the spectrum of tert-butanol in DMSO, where the hydroxyl proton is shifted 2.5 ppm down-field from where it is found in dilute chloroform solution. This is due to strong hydrogen bonding of the alcohol O–H to the sulfoxide oxygen, which not only de-shields the hydroxyl proton, but secures it from very rapid exchange reactions that prevent the display of spin-spin splitting. Similar but weaker hydrogen bonds are formed to the carbonyl oxygen of acetone and the nitrogen of acetonitrile. A useful application of this phenomenon is described elsewhere in this text.

Spin-Spin Interactions

The nmr spectrum of 1,1-dichloroethane (below right) is more complicated than we might have expected from the previous examples. Unlike its 1,2-dichloro-isomer (below left), which displays a single resonance signal from the four structurally equivalent hydrogens, the two signals from the different hydrogens are split into close groupings of two or more resonances. This is a common feature in the spectra of compounds having different sets of hydrogen atoms bonded to adjacent carbon atoms. The signal splitting in proton spectra is usually small, ranging from fractions of a Hz to as much as 18 Hz, and is designated as J (referred to as the coupling constant). In the 1,1-dichloroethane example all the coupling constants are 6.0 Hz, as illustrated by clicking on the spectrum.

1,2-dichloroethane		1,1-dichloroethane

The splitting patterns found in various spectra are easily recognized, provided the chemical shifts of the different sets of hydrogen that generate the signals differ by two or more ppm. The patterns are symmetrically distributed on both sides of the proton chemical shift, and the central lines are always stronger than the outer lines. The most commonly observed patterns have been given descriptive names, such as doublet (two equal intensity signals), triplet (three signals with an intensity ratio of 1:2:1) and quartet (a set of four signals with intensities of 1:3:3:1). Four such patterns are displayed in the following illustration. The line separation is always constant within a given multiplet, and is called the coupling constant (J). The magnitude of J, usually given in units of Hz, is magnetic field independent.

The splitting patterns shown above display the ideal or “First-Order” arrangement of lines. This is usually observed if the spin-coupled nuclei have very different chemical shifts (i.e. Δν is large compared to J). If the coupled nuclei have similar chemical shifts, the splitting patterns are distorted (second order behavior). In fact, signal splitting disappears if the chemical shifts are the same. Two examples that exhibit minor 2nd order distortion are shown below (both are taken at a frequency of 90 MHz). The ethyl acetate spectrum on the left displays the typical quartet and triplet of a substituted ethyl group. The spectrum of 1,3-dichloropropane on the right demonstrates that equivalent sets of hydrogens may combine their influence on a second, symmetrically located set. 
Even though the chemical shift difference between the A and B protons in the 1,3-dichloroethane spectrum is fairly large (140 Hz) compared with the coupling constant (6.2 Hz), some distortion of the splitting patterns is evident. The line intensities closest to the chemical shift of the coupled partner are enhanced. Thus the B set triplet lines closest to A are increased, and the A quintet lines nearest B are likewise stronger. A smaller distortion of this kind is visible for the A and C couplings in the ethyl acetate spectrum.

What causes this signal splitting, and what useful information can be obtained from it ? 
If an atom under examination is perturbed or influenced by a nearby nuclear spin (or set of spins), the observed nucleus responds to such influences, and its response is manifested in its resonance signal. This spin-coupling is transmitted through the connecting bonds, and it functions in both directions. Thus, when the perturbing nucleus becomes the observed nucleus, it also exhibits signal splitting with the same J. For spin-coupling to be observed, the sets of interacting nuclei must be bonded in relatively close proximity (e.g. vicinal and geminal locations), or be oriented in certain optimal and rigid configurations. Some spectroscopists place a number before the symbol J to designate the number of bonds linking the coupled nuclei (colored orange below). Using this terminology, a vicinal coupling constant is ³J and a geminal constant is ²J.

The following general rules summarize important requirements and characteristics for spin 1/2 nuclei :

1)   Nuclei having the same chemical shift (called isochronous) do not exhibit spin-splitting. They may actually be spin-coupled, but the splitting cannot be observed directly.
2)   Nuclei separated by three or fewer bonds (e.g. vicinal and geminal nuclei ) will usually be spin-coupled and will show mutual spin-splitting of the resonance signals (same J’s), provided they have different chemical shifts. Longer-range coupling may be observed in molecules having rigid configurations of atoms.
3)   The magnitude of the observed spin-splitting depends on many factors and is given by the coupling constant J (units of Hz). J is the same for both partners in a spin-splitting interaction and is independent of the external magnetic field strength.
4)   The splitting pattern of a given nucleus (or set of equivalent nuclei) can be predicted by the n+1 rule, where n is the number of neighboring spin-coupled nuclei with the same (or very similar) Js. If there are 2 neighboring, spin-coupled, nuclei the observed signal is a triplet ( 2+1=3 ); if there are three spin-coupled neighbors the signal is a quartet ( 3+1=4 ). In all cases the central line(s) of the splitting pattern are stronger than those on the periphery. The intensity ratio of these lines is given by the numbers in Pascal’s triangle. Thus a doublet has 1:1 or equal intensities, a triplet has an intensity ratio of 1:2:1, a quartet 1:3:3:1 etc. To see how the numbers in Pascal’s triangle are related to the Fibonacci series click on the diagram.

If a given nucleus is spin-coupled to two or more sets of neighboring nuclei by different J values, the n+1 rule does not predict the entire splitting pattern. Instead, the splitting due to one J set is added to that expected from the other J sets. Bear in mind that there may be fortuitous coincidence of some lines if a smaller J is a factor of a larger J.

<

Spin 1/2 nuclei include ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁹F & ³¹P. The spin-coupling interactions described above may occur between similar or dissimilar nuclei. If, for example, a ¹⁹F is spin-coupled to a ¹H, both nuclei will appear as doublets having the same J constant.  Spin coupling with nuclei having spin other than 1/2 is more complex and will not be discussed here.

To make use of a calculator that predicts first order splitting patterns Click Here. This application was developed at Colby College.

Some Examples

Test your ability to interpret ¹H nmr spectra by analyzing the seven examples presented below. The seven spectra may be examined in turn by clicking the “Toggle Spectra” button. Try to associate each spectrum with a plausible structural formula. 
Although the first four cases are relatively simple, keep in mind that the integration values provide ratios, not absolute numbers. In two cases additional information from infrared spectroscopy is provided. When you have made an assignment you may check your answer by clicking on the spectrum itself. In the sixth example, a similar constitutional isomer cannot be ruled out by the data given.

      3. Carbon NMR Spectroscopy
The power and usefulness of ¹H nmr spectroscopy as a tool for structural analysis should be evident from the past discussion. Unfortunately, when significant portions of a molecule lack C-H bonds, no information is forthcoming. Examples include polychlorinated compounds such as chlordane, polycarbonyl compounds such as croconic acid, and compounds incorporating triple bonds (structures below, orange colored carbons).

Even when numerous C-H groups are present, an unambiguous interpretation of a proton nmr spectrum may not be possible. The following diagram depicts three pairs of isomers (A & B) which display similar proton nmr spectra. Although a careful determination of chemical shifts should permit the first pair of compounds (blue box) to be distinguished, the second and third cases (red & green boxes) might be difficult to identify by proton nmr alone.

These difficulties would be largely resolved if the carbon atoms of a molecule could be probed by nmr in the same fashion as the hydrogen atoms. Since the major isotope of carbon (¹²C) has no spin, this option seems unrealistic. Fortunately, 1.1% of elemental carbon is the ¹³C isotope, which has a spin I = 1/2, so in principle it should be possible to conduct a carbon nmr experiment. It is worth noting here, that if much higher abundances of ¹³C were naturally present in all carbon compounds, proton nmr would become much more complicated due to large one-bond coupling of ¹³C and ¹H.

The most important operational technique that has led to successful and routine ¹³C nmr spectroscopy is the use of high-field pulse technology coupled with broad-band heteronuclear decoupling of all protons. The results of repeated pulse sequences are accumulated to provide improved signal strength. Also, for reasons that go beyond the present treatment, the decoupling irradiation enhances the sensitivity of carbon nuclei bonded to hydrogen. 
When acquired in this manner, the carbon nmr spectrum of a compound displays a single sharp signal for each structurally distinct carbon atom in a molecule (remember, the proton couplings have been removed). The spectrum of camphor, shown on the left below, is typical. Furthermore, a comparison with the ¹H nmr spectrum on the right illustrates some of the advantageous characteristics of carbon nmr. The dispersion of ¹³C chemical shifts is nearly twenty times greater than that for protons, and this together with the lack of signal splitting makes it more likely that every structurally distinct carbon atom will produce a separate signal. The only clearly identifiable signals in the proton spectrum are those from the methyl groups. The remaining protons have resonance signals between 1.0 and 2.8 ppm from TMS, and they overlap badly thanks to spin-spin splitting.

Unlike proton nmr spectroscopy, the relative strength of carbon nmr signals are not normally proportional to the number of atoms generating each one. Because of this, the number of discrete signals and their chemical shifts are the most important pieces of evidence delivered by a carbon spectrum. The general distribution of carbon chemical shifts associated with different functional groups is summarized in the following chart. Bear in mind that these ranges are approximate, and may not encompass all compounds of a given class. Note also that the over 200 ppm range of chemical shifts shown here is much greater than that observed for proton chemical shifts.

13C Chemical Shift Ranges*
Low Field Region		High Field Region
	* For samples in CDCl3 solution. The δ scale is relative to TMS at δ=0.

The isomeric pairs previously cited as giving very similar proton nmr spectra are now seen to be distinguished by carbon nmr. In the example on the left below (blue box), cyclohexane and 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene both give a single sharp resonance signal in the proton nmr spectrum (the former at δ 1.43 ppm and the latter at 1.64 ppm). However, in its carbon nmr spectrum cyclohexane displays a single signal at δ 27.1 ppm, generated by the equivalent ring carbon atoms (colored blue); whereas the isomeric alkene shows two signals, one at δ 20.4 ppm from the methyl carbons (colored brown), and the other at 123.5 ppm (typical of the green colored sp² hybrid carbon atoms).

The C₈H₁₀ isomers in the center (red) box have pairs of homotopic carbons and hydrogens, so symmetry should simplify their nmr spectra. The fulvene (isomer A) has five structurally different groups of carbon atoms (colored brown, magenta, orange, blue and green respectively) and should display five ¹³C nmr signals (one near 20 ppm and the other four greater than 100 ppm). Although ortho-xylene (isomer B) will have a proton nmr very similar to isomer A, it should only display four ¹³C nmr signals, originating from the four different groups of carbon atoms (colored brown, blue, orange and green). The methyl carbon signal will appear at high field (near 20 ppm), and the aromatic ring carbons will all give signals having δ > 100 ppm. Finally, the last isomeric pair, quinones A & B in the green box, are easily distinguished by carbon nmr. Isomer A displays only four carbon nmr signals (δ 15.4, 133.4, 145.8 & 187.9 ppm); whereas, isomer B displays five signals (δ 15.9, 133.3, 145.8, 187.5 & 188.1 ppm), the additional signal coming from the non-identity of the two carbonyl carbon atoms (one colored orange and the other magenta).

Only 15$ for interpretation of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

1. NMRshiftdb

NMRshiftdb2 is a NMR database (web database) for organic structures and their nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr) spectra. It allows for spectrum prediction (¹³C, ¹H and other nuclei) as well as for searching spectra, structures and other properties. The nmrshiftdb2 software is open source, the data is published under an open content license. The core of nmrshitdb2 are fully assigned spectra with raw data and peak lists (we have pure peak lists as well). Those datasets are peer reviewed by a board of reviewers. The project is supported by a scientific advisory board.

nmrshiftdb2 is part of the NFDI4Chem initiative and will provide a component for a curated repository there. Please consult the documentation for more detailed information.

See: https://nmrshiftdb.nmr.uni-koeln.de/portal

2. ACD/NMR

ACD/NMR Workbook Suite is a comprehensive NMR software application with an intuitive interface. It features a full suite of advanced processing, analysis, and databasing functionalities for 1D and 2D NMR data from all major vendor formats. NMR Workbook Suite is built upon cutting-edge algorithms for the most reliable NMR data interpretation. It is designed to streamline routine NMR workflows, simplify structure characterization, and much more.

Powerful NMR Interpretation Software | Highlights

• Import and process 1D and 2D NMR data from all major instrument vendor formats in a single collaborative platform
• Process NMR data manually or automate routine processing workflows—Fourier transformation, calibration, peak picking, integration, multiplet analysis, etc.
• Synchronize peak picking and assignments across datasets within a project
• Confidently verify structures with 3 different verification levels
• Perform targeted analysis of known mixture components and optimize untargeted mixture analysis workflow
• Perform Conformational Analysis using NOESY/ROESY spectra
• Create comprehensive multiplet reports and publication-ready data
• Store, manage, and share live NMR spectra

Synchronize peak picking and assignments across NMR datasets using NMRSync—our game-changing technology. Plus, the associated peaks from NMRSync, NMR prediction, and connectivity-based algorithms are automatically used to only identify the assignments that match all data. This quick and accurate peak picking and assignment workflow helps you to maximize your productivity in the following ways:

• Use any peak in any spectrum to initiate NMRSync
• Integrate a peak in any spectrum and all related peaks in the 1D and 2D NMR spectra of that dataset will be identified and linked in real time
• Automatically resolve overlapping ¹H and ¹³C peaks from 2D NMR data
• Receive immediate color-coded feedback on the best assignment for instant decision-making purposes

NMR Workbook Suite includes three levels of structure verification that evaluate alternative structures to varying degrees for added flexibility in your NMR analysis. This ensures the best structure that matches the experimental NMR data is confirmed with much less time and effort than manual interpretation.

• Determine how well your proposed structure matches the datasets in your NMR project with single structure verification
• Generate a specified number of alternative structures, based on the user-defined proposed structure, and evaluate whether they are a better match to the NMR dataset using Combined and Concurrent Verification
• Generate and view every alternative structural and cis/trans isomer that matches the experimental data in real-time using Unbiased Verification for an absolute level of confidence. This workflow eliminates the user bias and ensures the assigned structure is indeed the best structure that fits the experimental data.

See: https://www.acdlabs.com/products/spectrus/workbooks/nmr/

3. See: http://www.cheminfo.org/Spectra/NMR/Predictions/1H_Prediction/index.html

4. See: https://www.nmrprocflow.org/

5. See: https://chem.washington.edu/facilities/data-processing

6. See: https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky/

7. See: http://www.nmrdb.org/about/

Only 15$ for interpretation of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) interpretation plays a pivotal role in molecular identifications. As interpreting NMR spectra, the structure of an unknown compound, as well as known structures, can be assigned by several factors such as chemical shift, spin multiplicity, coupling constants, and integration. This Module focuses on the most important ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra to find out structure even though there are various kinds of NMR spectra such as ¹⁴N, ¹⁹F, and ³¹P. NMR spectrum shows that x- axis is chemical shift in ppm. It also contains integral areas, splitting pattern, and coupling constant.

Strategy for Solving Structure

Here is the general strategy for solving structure with NMR:

1. Molecular formula is determined by chemical analysis such as elementary analysis
2. Double-bond equivalent (also known as Degree of Unsaturation) is calculated by a simple equation to estimate the number of the multiple bonds and rings. It assumes that oxygen (O) and sulfur (S) are ignored and halogen (Cl, Br) and nitrogen is replaced by CH. The resulting empirical formula is C_aH_b

3. Structure fragmentation is determined by chemical shift, spin multiplicity, integral (peak area), and coupling constants (1J1J, 2J2J)
4. Molecular skeleton is built up using 2-dimensional NMR spectroscopy.
5. Relative configuration is predicted by coupling constant (³J).

¹H NMR

Chemical Shift

Chemical shift is associated with the Larmor frequency of a nuclear spin to its chemical environment. Tetramethylsilane (TMS, (CH3)4Si(CH3)4Si) is generally used as an internal standard to determine chemical shift of compounds: δ_TMS=0 ppm. In other words, frequencies for chemicals are measured for a ¹H or ¹³C nucleus of a sample from the ¹H or ¹³C resonance of TMS. It is important to understand trend of chemical shift in terms of NMR interpretation. The proton NMR chemical shift is affect by nearness to electronegative atoms (O, N, halogen.) and unsaturated groups (C=C,C=O, aromatic). Electronegative groups move to the down field (left; increase in ppm). Unsaturated groups shift to downfield (left) when affecting nucleus is in the plane of the unsaturation, but reverse shift takes place in the regions above and below this plane. ¹H chemical shift play a role in identifying many functional groups. Figure 11. indicates important example to figure out the functional groups.

Chemical equivalence

Protons with Chemical equivalence has the same chemical shift due to symmetry within molecule (CH3COCH3CH3COCH3) or fast rotation around single bond (-CH₃; methyl groups).

Spin-Spin Splitting

Spin-Spin splitting means that an absorbing peak is split by more than one “neighbor” proton. Splitting signals are separated to J Hz, where is called the coupling constant. The spitting is a very essential part to obtain exact information about the number of the neighboring protons. The maximum of distance for splitting is three bonds. Chemical equivalent protons do not result in spin-spin splitting. When a proton splits, the proton’s chemical shift is determined in the center of the splitting lines.

Spin Multiplicity (Splitting pattern)

Spin Multiplicity plays a role in determining the number of neighboring protons. Here is a multiplicity rules: In case of AmBnAmBn system, the multiplicity rule is that Nuclei of BB element produce a splitting the AA signal into nB+1nB+1 lines. The general formula which applies to all nuclei is 2nI+12nI+1, where II is the spin quantum number of the coupled element. The relative intensities of the each lines are given by the coefficients of the Pascal’s triangle (Figure 22).

First-order splitting pattern

The chemical shift difference in Hertz between coupled protons in Hertz is much larger than the JJ coupling constant:ΔνJ≥8(1)(1)ΔνJ≥8

Where ΔνΔν is the difference of chemical shift. In other word, the proton is only coupled to other protons that are far away in chemical shift. The spectrum is called first-order spectrum. The splitting pattern depends on the magnetic field. The second-order splitting at the lower field can be resolved into first-order splitting pattern at the high field. The first-order splitting pattern is allowed to multiplicity rule (N+1) and Pascal’s triangle to determine splitting pattern and intensity distribution.

Example 11

The note is that structure system is A₃M₂X₂. H_a and H_x has the triplet pattern by Hm because of N+1 rule. The signal of Hm is split into six peaks by H_x and H_a(Figure3) The First order pattern easily is predicted due to separation with equal splitting pattern.

High-order splitting pattern

High-order splitting pattern takes place when chemical shift difference in Hertz is much less or the same that order of magnitude as the j coupling.ΔvJ≤10(2)(2)ΔvJ≤10

The second order pattern is observed as leaning of a classical pattern: the inner peaks are taller and the outer peaks are shorter in case of AB system (Figure 44). This is called the roof effect.

Here is other system as an example: A₂B₂ (Figure 55). The two triplet incline toward each other. Outer lines of the triplet are less than 1 in relative area and the inner lines are more than 1. The center lines have relative area 2.

Coupling constant (J Value)

Coupling constant is the strength of the spin-spin splitting interaction and the distance between the split lines. The value of distance is equal or different depending on the coupled nuclei. The coupling constants reflect the bonding environments of the coupled nuclei. Coupling constant is classified by the number of bonds:

Geminal proton-proton coupling (²J_HH)

Germinal coupling generates through two bonds (Figure 66). Two proton having geminal coupling are not chemically equivalent. This coupling ranges from -20 to 40 Hz. ²J_HHdepends on hybridization of carbon atom and the bond angle and the substituent such as electronegative atoms. When S-character is increased, Geminal coupling constant is increased: ²J_sp1>²J_sp2>²J_sp3 The bond angle(HCH) gives rise to change ²J_HH value and depend on the strain of the ring in the cyclic systems. Geminal coupling constant determines ring size. When bond angle is decreased, ring size is decreased so that geminal coupling constant is more positive. If a atom is replace to an electronegative atom, Geminal coupling constant move to positive value.

Vicinal proton-proton coupling (³J_HH)

Vicinal coupling occurs though three bonds (Figure 77.). The Vicinal coupling is the most useful information of dihedral angle, leading to stereochemistry and conformation of molecules. Vicinal coupling constant always has the positive value and is affected by the dihedral angle (?;HCCH), the valence angle (?; HCC), the bond length of carbon-carbon, and the effects of electronegative atoms. Vicinal coupling constant depending on the dihedral angle (Figure 88) is given by the Karplus equation.3J=7.0−0.5cosϕ+4.5cos2ϕ(3)(3)3J=7.0−0.5cos⁡ϕ+4.5cos2⁡ϕ

When ? is the 90^o, vicinal coupling constant is zero. In addition, vicinal coupling constant ranges from 8 to 10 Hz at the and ?=180^o, where ?=0^o and ?=180^o means that the coupled protons have cis and trans configuration, respectively.

The valence angle(?;Figure 88) also causes change of ³J_HH value. Valence angle is related with ring size. Typically, when the valence angle decreases, the coupling constant reduces. The distance between the carbons atoms gives influences to vicinal coupling constant

The coupling constant increases with the decrease of bond length. Electronegative atoms affect vicinal coupling constants so that electronegative atoms decrease the vicinal coupling constants.

Integral

Integral is referred to integrated peak area of 1H signals. The intensity is directly proportionally to the number of hydrogen.

¹³C NMR

Chemical Shift

Spin-Spin splitting

Comparing the ¹H NMR, there is a big difference thing in the ¹³C NMR. The ¹³C- ¹³ C spin-spin splitting rarely exit between adjacent carbons because ¹³C is naturally lower abundant (1.1%)

• ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling: ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling provides useful information about the number of protons attached a carbon atom. In case of one bond coupling (¹J_CH), -CH, -CH₂, and CH₃ have respectively doublet, triplet, quartets for the ¹³C resonances in the spectrum. However, ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling has an disadvantage for ¹³C spectrum interpretation. ¹³C-¹H Spin coupling is hard to analyze and reveal structure due to a forest of overlapping peaks that result from 100% abundance of ¹H.
• Decoupling: Decoupling is the process of removing ¹³C-¹H coupling interaction to simplify a spectrum and identify which pair of nuclei is involved in the J coupling. The decoupling ¹³C spectra shows only one peak(singlet) for each unique carbon in the molecule(Figure 1010.). Decoupling is performed by irradiating at the frequency of one proton with continuous low-power RF.

• Distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT): DEPT is used for distinguishing between a CH₃ group, a CH₂ group, and a CH group. The proton pulse is set at 45^o, 90^o, or 135^o in the three separate experiments. The different pulses depend on the number of protons attached to a carbon atom. Figure 1111. is an example about DEPT spectrum.

2-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (COSY)

COSY stands for COrrelation SpectroscopY. COSY spectrum is more useful information about what is being correlated.

¹H-¹H COSY (COrrelation SpectroscopY)

¹H-¹H COSY is used for clearly indicate correlation with coupled protons. A point of entry into a COSY spectrum is one of the keys to predict information from it successfully. Relation of Coupling protons is determined by cross peaks(correlation peaks) and in the COSY spectrum. In other words, Diagonal peaks by lines ar e coupled to each other. Figure 1212 indicates that there are correlation peaks between proton H₁ and H₂ as well as between H₂ and H₄. This means the H₂ coupled to H₁ and H₄.

¹H-¹³C COSY (HETCOR)

¹H-¹³C COSY is the heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. The HETCOR spectrum is correlated ¹³C nuclei with directly attached protons. ¹H-¹³C coupling is one bond. The cross peaks mean correlation between a proton and a carbon (Figure 1313). If a line does not have cross peak, this means that this carbon atoms has no attached proton (e.g. a quaternary carbon atom)

References

1. Balc*, M., Basic p1 sH- and p13 sC-NMR spectroscopy. 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam ; Boston, 2005; p xii, 427.
2. Breitmaier, E., Structure elucidation by NMR in organic chemistry : a practical guide. 3rd rev. ed.; Wiley: Chichester, West Sussex, England, 2002; p xii, 258.
3. Jacobsen, N. E., NMR spectroscopy explained : simplified theory, applications and examples for organic chemistry and structural biology. Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, N.J., 2007; p xv, 668.
4. Silverstein, R. M.; Webster, F. X., Spectrometric identification of organic compounds. 6th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1998; p xiv, 482.

Outside Links

• NMRShiftDB: a Free web database for NMR data : nmrshiftdb.chemie.uni-mainz.de/nmrshiftdb
• NMR database from ACD/LAbs : www.acdlabs.com/products/spec_lab/exp_spectra/spec_libraries/aldrich.html
• NMR database from John Crerar Library : http://crerar.typepad.com/crerar_lib…h_ir_nmr_.html

Problems

Draw the 1H NMR spectrum for 2-Hydroxypropane in CDCl3. Assume sufficient resolution to provide a first-order spectrum and ignore vicinal proton-proton coupling(3JHH)

Solution

1) the structure of 2-hydoroxyporpane is drawn

Figure out which protons are chemically equivalent, i.e., two methyl (-CH₃) groups are chemical equivalent.

4) Splitting pattern is determined by (N+1) rule: Ha is split into two peaks by H_b(#of proton=1). H_b has the septet pattern by H_a (#of proton=6). H_c has one peak.(Note that H_c has doublet pattern by H_b due to vicinal proton-proton coupling.)

Only 15$ for interpretation of your NMR spectrum
Payment Upon Completion
Send your results...

This handout relates the basic theory of NMR described on the theory web handout with spectra of real molecules and how to deduce structure from the spectra. Before reading this handout, you need to be thoroughly familiar with all of theory concepts that were described.

1.0 The NMR spectrum.

1.1 Because different amounts of electron density are around different non-eqivalent nuclei, the different non-equivalent nuclei in a molecule are experiencing slightly different net magnetic fields in an NMR experiment (Review Section 5.2A of the theory handout). Recall also that the difference in energy between the two allowed spin states (+1/2 and -1/2 spin states) of a spin 1/2 nucleus (like in 1H and 13C nuclei) depends on the exact magnetic field felt by the nucleus (Review Section 2.3Cin the theory handout). Recall further that in the NMR experiment, when and only when nuclei are irradiated with electromagnetic radiation of energy that exactlycorresponds to the energy difference between the +1/2 and -1/2 spin states, the nuclei absorb the energy and the NMR spectrometer measures this absorbance (Review section 3.1 of the theory handout). The absorbance of energy to convert a nucleus from a +1/2 to a -1/2 spin state is referred to as “resonance” of that nucleus.1.1A The key conclusion is that nuclei with different electron densities have +1/2 and -1/2 spin states that differ in energy by differing amounts, so these nuclei will absorb electromagnetic radiation of different frequencies in the NMR experiment.

1.1B Nuclei surrounded by greater amounts of electron density will be more shielded from the external magnetic field, so they will absorb electromagnetic radiation of lower energy, that is, lower frequency (energy is proportional to frequency). You may want to review Section 5.2A of the theory handout again.

1.1C The converse is also true, namely that nuclei surrounded by lesser amounts of electron density will be less shielded (referred to as being “deshielded”) from the external magnetic field, so they will absorb electromagnetic radiation of higher energy, that is, higher frequency(energy is proportional to frequency).

1.1D The three most important factors influencing the electron density around a hydrogen nucleus are: (i) adjacent electronegative atoms remove electron density; (ii) hybridization of the attached carbon atom, increasing shielding is observed in the order sp2, sp, sp3; (iii) adjacent pi bonds are deshielding, which relates to (ii).1.2 An NMR spectrum is a plot of absorbance versus frequency.

1.2A To make different spectra directly comparable, a standard is used for all NMR spectra. For 1H NMR spectra, the standard is called tetramethylsilane (TMS) and a small amount of TMS is usually added to any 1H NMR sample.

1.2B Magnets of different strengths lead to absorbance of electromagnetic radiation at different frequencies for the same nucleus, meaning that if simple frequency were plotted in an NMR spectra, you could not compare spectra taken of the same sample on machines with different magnet strengths. To solve this problem, the frequency of absorption plotted on NMR spectra are corrected for the magnet strength. In addition, frequency is correlated to the reference compound TMS. The frequency at which TMS absorbs is defined as 0 frequency by convention. In the NMR spectrum, absorbance frequencies of electromagnetic radiation are plotted as chemical shift (d) listed in units called parts per million (ppm) that is defined by the following equation:

1.3 The bottom line to this entire section is that the hydrogen atoms of different functional groups (methyl groups, -CH2- groups, aldehyde -C(O)H, alkene C-H, etc.) have characteristic chemical shifts, i.e. absorbance frequencies. These characteristic chemical shifts are collected in tables such as Fgure 13.8 and Appendix 4 of your book. From the chemical shift information, you thus know what functional groups are present in a molecule.

1.4 Chemically equivalent hydrogen atoms will have the same chemical shift and therefore give rise to the same signal. This is why we defined equivalent atoms in Section6.1 of the theory handout. Non-equivalent groups of hydrogens will have different chemical shifts. Thus, you will have as many different signals in an NMR spectrum as there are chemically non-equivalent groups of hydrogen atoms.

2.0 The nuclear spin of hydrogen atoms creates a magnetic field that influences the chemical shift of nearby hydrogen atoms (Review Sections 5.1 and 5.2).

2.1 Nuclear spin magnetic fields will influence hydrogen atoms that are three or fewer bonds away from each other in the same molecule. Hydrogen atoms that are four or greater bonds away usually do not influence each other.

2.2 A hydrogen atom with a nuclecus in a spin state of +1/2 produces a slightly different magnetic field than a one in a –1/2 spin state.

2.3 Even in a strong magnetic field, across a population of molecules, there is only a very slight excess of nuclei in the +1/2 spin state.

2.4 Putting all of these ideas together means the following: Consider a hydrogen X adjacent (three bonds away) to another hydrogen Y in a molecule. In around half of the molecules in the NMR sample, hydrogen X feels the magnetic field from a Y with nuclear spin of +1/2. The other half feel from Y a nuclear spin of –1/2. Thus, when you look at the spectrum, there are actually two different, but closely spaced peaks as the signal for hydrogen X. This phenomenon is called “spin-spin” splitting, and the distance between the two signals for X is called the “coupling constant”, often denoted as “J”. Similarly, the signal for Y actually has two peaks because of spin-spin splitting by X.

2.5 Consider a –CH2- group adjacent to a hydrogen X. Both of the hydrogen atoms in the –CH2- are chemically equivalent and could be either in the +1/2 or –1/2 nuclear spin state. Thus, there are three situations possible: i) +1/2,+1/2; ii) +1/2,-1/2, which is the same as –1/2, +1/2 and iii) –1/2,-1/2. Thus, there are actually three different magnetic fields that are felt by X in molecules of the sample, in a 1:2:1 ratio. Thus, the signal for hydrogen X is split into three peaks in a 1:2:1 ratio.

2.6 The same holds for a –CH3 group, that will split an adjacent hydrogen signal into four peaks, with a 1:3:3:1 ratio. You should verify this for yourself by making all the possible combinations of nuclear spins for the three equivalent hydrogen atoms of a methyl group.

2.7 In the general case, N equivalent hydrogen atoms will split an adjacent signal into (N+1) peaks, with relative ratios that are predicted by Pascal’s triangle (Figure 13.16 in the book).

3.0 Following the same logic, the splitting should multiply if a single hydrogen atom is adjacent to hydrogen atoms on either side. Think about combining all the possible nuclear spin states for these nearby sets of hydrogen atoms. Thus, if you have a hydrogen atom X between one –CH2- and one –CH3 group, it should be split into an amazing (2+1) x (3 + 1) = 12 signals because there are that many different combinations of +1/2 and -1/2 spins possible.

3.1 Thus, if the coupling constants (J) from the –CH2- and –CH3 groups are significantly different from each other, then 12 peaks will be observed as the signal for hydrogen X.

3.2 However, in practice, coupling constants (J) are pretty close to the same value for almost all sets of hydrogen atoms in organic molecules, simplifying the splitting pattern, since now many of the twelve peaks will overlap with each other. What this means is that for almost all the spectra you will see, if a hydrogen X is surrounded by N hydrogen atoms, the signal for X will be split into only (N+1) peaks, no matter how those N hydrogen atoms are grouped in terms of sets of equivalent atoms. Thus, what is actually seen for the example above is that the signal for X would appear in the spectrum to be split into 2 + 3 + 1 = 6 peaks, not 12, peaks. This is the so-called “N+1” rule.

3.3 The diagram below shows these two different situations. When nuclei from hydrogen atoms Z and Y split the signal for hydrogen X with very different coupling constants (notice how the coupling constant J for the red Z hydrogen nuclei is larger than J for the blue Y hydrogen nuclei), all twelve peaks are spread out and identifiable. Below that is shown the situation in which the coupling constants are the same for nuclei of both Z and Y, so only 6 peaks are actually observed in the signal for hydrogen X due to extensive overlap. This latter case, with six peaks, is what you will almost always see in reality since coupling constants tend to be similar in organic molecules.

3.3 The above explanation of splitting can confuse students for a while. The important point is that in the example given, you see 6 different peaks in the spectrum (N+1 rule) even though there are really 12 peaks produced, it is just that several of them are on top of each other because the coupling constants are the same. For alkyl groups in organic molecules, the coupling constants are generally the same so you will almost always see the fewer peaks, corresponding to the simple N+1 rule, rather than the greater number of peaks derived from the multiplication rule.

3.4 The bottom line here is that by seeing how a given signal is split, you can figure out how many hydrogen atoms are adjacent on the molecule, namely the number of peaks in the signal minus 1. From this information you can piece together what a molecule looks like if you know how many atoms of each type are present (i.e. the molecular formula such as C4H10N2O). You get the molecular formula information from something called a mass spectrum, described later in the text. Molecular formulas will be provided to you in homework or test questions.

4.0 For a given signal, integrating the signal (include all splitting peaks for a given signal) gives you a relative value that is proportional to the number of equivalent hydrogen atoms that gave rise to the signal. Thus, by looking at the integration values, you can deduce how many of each type of equivalent hydrogen atoms are in the molecule. For example, a -CH3 group would have a signal that integrates to a relative value of 3 (no matter how the signal is split), and a -CH2- group would have a relative integration of 2, etc. Note that sometimes integrations are simply given as absolute numbers, and you must find the common factor to deduce how many hydrogen atoms are represented by each integration value.

5.0 Putting it all together: How to deduce a structure from an NMR spectrum. First, you must be given the molecular formula, so you know how many of each type of atom are present. Second, count the number of different signals and their relative integrations to see how many different sets of equivalent hydrogen atoms are in a molecule, and how many of each set are present. Compare the chemical shifts of each signal to tables to identify what functional groups are present. Finally, use the signal splittings to determine which hydrogen atoms must be no more than 3 bonds away from each other.

6.0 For alkenes, the pi bond prevents bond rotation so the different hydrogen atoms on an unsymmetrical alkene are not equivalent, so they all have different signals, and splitting follows the multiplicative rule (the coupling constants are usually significantly different for geminal vs. cis. vs. trans relationships).

7.0 For hydrogens in a -CH2- group adjacent to a chiral center, the two different H atoms are no longer equivalent, because even with bond rotation, the two hydrogens are never in the same environment with respect to the groups on the adjacent chiral center. Thus, each H of -CH2- group adjacent to a chiral center usually has its own signal in the NMR spectrum.

8.0 There is a great deal more to NMR than this, I am only trying to give you the basics here.

Only 10 $ for interpretation of your Raman spectrum

Payment Upon Completion

Contact us…

It is the shift in wavelength of the inelastically scattered radiation that provides the chemical and structural information. Raman shifted photons can be of either higher or lower energy, depending upon the vibrational state of the molecule under study. A simplified energy diagram that illustrates these concepts is shown below.

Stokes radiation occurs at lower energy (longer wavelength) than the Rayleigh radiation, and anti-Stokes radiation has greater energy. The energy increase or decrease is related to the vibrational energy levels in the ground electronic state of the molecule, and as such, the observed Raman shift of the Stokes and anti-Stokes features are a direct measure of the vibrational energies of the molecule. A schematic Raman spectrum may appear as shown below.

The energy of the scattered radiation is less than the incident radiation for the Stokes line and the energy of the scattered radiation is more than the incident radiation for the anti-Stokes line. The energy increase or decrease from the excitation is related to the vibrational energy spacing in the ground electronic state of the molecule and therefore the wavenumber of the Stokes and anti-Stokes lines are a direct measure of the vibrational energies of the molecule.

In the example spectrum, notice that the Stokes and anti-Stokes lines are equally displaced from the Rayleigh line. This occurs because in either case one vibrational quantum of energy is gained or lost. Also, note that the anti-Stokes line is much less intense than the Stokes line. This occurs because only molecules that are vibrationally excited prior to irradiation can give rise to the anti-Stokes line. Hence, in Raman spectroscopy, only the more intense Stokes line is normally measured – Raman scattering is a relatively weak process. The number of photons Raman scattered is quite small. However, there are several processes which can be used to enhance the sensitivity of a Raman measurement.

Simplified energy diagram

If the wavelength of the exciting laser coincides with an electronic absorption of a molecule, the intensity of Raman-active vibrations associated with the absorbing chromophore are enhanced by a factor of 102 to 104. This resonance enhancement or resonance Raman effect can be extremely useful, not just in significantly lowering the detection limits, but also in introducing electronic selectivety. Thus the resonance Raman technique is used for providing both structural and electronic insight into species of interest.

Metalloporphyrins, carotenoids and several other classes of biologically important molecules have strongly allowed electronic transitions in the visible, making them ideal candidates for resonance Raman spectroscopy. Resonance selectivity has a further practical use, in that spectrum of the chromophoric moiety is resonance enhanced and that of the surrounding environment is not. For biological chromophores, this means that absorbing active centres can be specifically probed by visible excitation wavelengths, and not the surrounding protein matrix (which would require UV lasers to bring into resonance).

Resonance Raman spectroscopy is also an important probe of the chemistry of metal centred complexes, fullerenes, polydiacetylenes and other “exotic” molecules which strongly absorb in the visible. Although many more molecules absorb in the ultraviolet, the high cost of lasers and optics for this spectral region have limited ultraviolet (UV) resonance Raman spectroscopy to a small number of specialist groups.

Schematic Raman spectrum

Vibrations which are resonantly enhanced fall into two or three general mechanistic classes. The most common case is Franck-Condon enhancement, in which a component of the normal coordinate of the vibration occurs in a direction in which the molecule expands during an electronic excitation. The more the molecule expands along this axis when it absorbs light, the larger the enhancement factor. The easily visualized ring breathing (in-plane expansion) modes of porphyrins fall into this class. Vibrations which couple two electronic excited states are also resonantly enhanced, through a mechanism called vibronic enhancement. In both cases, enhancement factors roughly follow the intensities of the absorption spectrum. The fuller theory of resonance enhancement is beyond the scope of this section.

Resonance enhancement does not begin at a sharply defined wavelength. In fact, enhancement of 5x to 10x is observed if the exciting laser is within even a few 100 wavenumbers below the electronic transition of a molecule. This “pre-resonance” enhancement can be experimentally useful.

The Raman scattering from a compound (or ion) adsorbed on or even within a few Angstroms of a structured metal surface can be 103 to 106x greater than in solution. This surface-enhanced Raman scattering is strongest on silver, but is observable on gold and copper as well. At practical excitation wavelengths, enhancement on other metals is unimportant.

SERS arises from two mechanisms:

1. The first is an enhanced electromagnetic field produced at the surface of the metal. When the wavelength of the incident light is close to the plasma wavelength of the metal, conduction electrons in the metal surface are excited into an extended surface electronic excited state called a surface plasmon resonance. Molecules adsorbed or in close proximity to the surface experience an exceptionally large electromagnetic field. Vibrational modes normal to the surface are most strongly enhanced.
2. The second mode of enhancement is by the formation of a charge-transfer complex between the surface and analyte molecule. The electronic transitions of many charge transfer complexes are in the visible, so that resonance enhancement occurs. Molecules with lone pair electrons or pi clouds show the strongest SERS. The effect was first discovered with pyridine.

Other aromatic nitrogen or oxygen containing compounds, such as aromatic amines or phenols, are strongly SERS active. The effect can also be seen with other electron-rich functionalities such as carboxylic acids. The intensity of the surface plasmon resonance is dependent on many factors including the wavelength of the incident light and the morphology of the metal surface. The wavelength should match the plasma wavelength of the metal. This is about 382 nm for a 5μm silver particle, but can be as high as 600nm for larger ellipsoidal silver particles. The plasma wavelength is to the red of 650nm for copper and gold, the other two metals which show SERS at wavelengths in the 350-1000 nm region. The best morphology for surface plasmon resonance excitation is a small (<100nm) particle or an atomically rough surface. SERS is commonly employed to study monolayers of materials adsorbed on metals, including electrodes.

Other popular surfaces include colloids, metal films on dielectric substrates and, recently, arrays of metal particles bound to metal or dielectric colloids through short linkages. Although SERS allows easy observation of Raman spectra from solution concentrations in the micromolar (10x-6) range,non-reproducability of quantitative measurements has in the past marred its utility for analytical purposes. However, standardization in production of SERS active media is steadily improving its potential in this area also.

UVRRS is a powerful tool in the molecular analysis of complex biological systems. Most biological systems absorb UV radiation and hence have the ability to offer resonance with UV Raman excitation. This results in the highly selective resonance Raman effect enabling enhancement of important biological targets such as protein or DNA. For example, excitation around 200nm enhances the Raman peaks from vibrations of amide groups; excitation around 220nm enhances peaks from certain aromatic residues. The Raman scatter from water is weak, allowing for analysis of very weak aqueous systems.

Fiber optic UVRRS configuration

Due to the selective nature of UVRRS, a tunable laser is typically required as the excitation source. Since truly tunable continuous-wave lasers are not yet available, a Nd:YAG-pumped dye laser with frequency-doubled output is one suitable UVRRS system. Depending on the dyes used, this laser setup can give almost any required UV wavelength. Intensified CCDs (ICCDs) with UV photocathodes, back-illuminated CCDs or CCDs with UV enhancing (BASF lumogen)coatings can be used as detectors for UVRRS. These detectors are used on account of their high detection efficiency and multichannel capabilities. The primary obstacle to the merging of the worlds of UVRRS and fiber-optic spectroscopy is solarization, the process by which UV radiation causes opacity of fiber-optics (even quite pure silica fibers). This opacity impairs transmission, rendering standard fiber-optics useless for UVRRS.

Species of Interest

Pulsed lasers are typically utilized in the study of short-lived species. A laser pulse can be supplied to a molecular system with enough energy to redistribute the electrons in a molecule causing the formation of an excited state as illustrated on the right. The Raman spectrum of this excited state molecule can be studied either using the same laser pulse or a different pulse from a second laser (single color and two-color pulsed Raman). Excited states of interest can have lifetimes, from picoseconds to milliseconds, but the majority can be studied using gating in the order of 5ns. As the majority of excited states are generated using UV and visible lasers, photocathodes with high UV and visible Quantum Efficiencies (QEs) are typically suitable.

Schematic of pump-probe (two color) Raman

The simplest pulsed laser experiments are so-called single-color experiments where high irradiance laser pulses are used both to initiate the photoreaction, and then to Raman probe the transient species created within the pulse width. By opening the intensifier tube as shown on the right, only the Raman spectrum of the excited state will be recorded. This pulse/ICCD gate combination will be repeated and accumulated hundreds to thousands of times in order to achieve a good overall signal-to-noise ratio with high dynamic range.

In Time Resolved Resonance Raman (TR3) spectroscopy, pairs of laser pulses of different wavelength are used to photolyse (optically “pump”) and then to Raman probe the transient species of interest. The spectral window of the spectrograph/detector is chosen so that it corresponds to the frequency range of the Raman scattering from the probe laser.

Pulsed two color Raman layout with delays under the control of a delay generator

In Time Resolved Resonance Raman (TR3) spectroscopy, pairs of laser pulses of different wavelength are used to photolyse (optically “pump”) and then to Raman probe the transient species of interest. The spectral window of the spectrograph/detector is chosen so that it corresponds to the frequency range of the Raman scattering from the probe laser.

The time evolution of the transient signal is monitored by recording a series of spectra at different delays after the photolysis event, i.e. at a series of time delays between the excitation and probe pulses. The ICCD camera or either of the lasers can supply the trigger. A delay generator is used to control the delays.

In Raman microscopy, a research grade optical microscope is coupled to the excitation laser and the spectrometer, thus producing a platform capable of obtaining both conventional images and in addition generating Raman Spectra from sample areas approaching the diffraction limit (~1 micron). Imaging and spectroscopy can be combined to generate “Raman cubes”, 3- dimensional data sets, yielding spectral information at every pixel of the 2D image.

A motorized xyz microscope stage can be used to automatically record spectral files, which will constitute the basis of Raman images, Raman maps or a set of Raman spectra recorded from preselected points. Specific software routines will allow the quick and easy reconstruction of these maps. The possibility of generating two-dimensional and three-dimensional images of a sample, using various special features, is an evident advantage over either traditional spectroscopy or microscopy.

Time delay sequences

The first ever Raman “instrument” was constructed in 1928. This instrument used monochromatized sunlight as a light source and a human eye as a detector. Raman instrumentation was developed (based around arc lamps and photographic plates) and soon became very popular up until the 1950s. Since these early days, Raman instrumentation has evolved markedly. Modern instrumentation typically consists of a laser, Rayleigh filter, a few lenses, a spectrograph and a detector (typically a CCD or ICCD).

Typical Continuous Wave (CW) Raman layout

One of the major advantages of dispersive Raman is that it offers the possibility to select the optimal laser excitation wavelength to permit the recording of the best Raman information. For example, wavelengths can be selected to offer the best resonance with the sample under investigation.

One might also need to tune wavelength to avoid fluorescence and thermal emission backgrounds. Nowadays, it is possible to use laser lines from UV, (down to 200nm) up to the infrared, (1.06μm Nd:YAG laser line), from microWatts up to several Watts.